Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence?

Ambar Banerjee, Catherine Beck, Vimal K. Narula, John Linn, Sabrena Noria, Bradley Zagol, Dean J. Mikami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The advent of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) not only reduced the morbidity associated with open repair but also led to a decrease in the hernia recurrence rate. However, the rate continues to remain significant. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 193 patients who were treated with LVHR by two minimally invasive surgeons in a 24-month period. The patient population was broadly divided into two groups based on the laparoscopic repair of the fascial defect with mesh underlay, or with primary suture repair and mesh underlay (PSR ? MU). Patient demographics, rates of hernia recurrence, and other associated complications were compared between the two groups. Patient variables and the clinical outcomes were analyzed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. Results One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients underwent LVHR for incisional (n = 136), umbilical (n = 44), epigastric (n = 9), and parastomal (n = 4) hernia. Hernia recurrence was documented in eight patients (4.1%). The mean follow-up period was 10.5 months (range 1-36 months). Incisional hernias accounted for all eight recurrences. The rate of recurrence in those treated with PSR ? MU was 3% (two of 67 cases) in comparison with 4.8% (six of 126 patients) associated with mesh alone. The rate of recurrence in the recurrent hernia group, treated with mesh only, was 10.5% (four of 38 patients) compared with 4.8% (one of 21 patients) in the PSR ? MU group. Conclusions Primary laparoscopic repair along with mesh placement for the management of ventral hernia was found to be effective in selected cases as evidenced by the low rate of recurrence when compared with conventional laparoscopic repair with mesh alone. Further retrospective and prospective studies, with larger patient enrollment, are warranted to confirm the benefit of this technique over traditional repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1264-1268
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ventral Hernia
Herniorrhaphy
Recurrence
Hernia
Retrospective Studies
Umbilicus
Chi-Square Distribution
Sutures
Observational Studies
Demography
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
  • Primary repair with mesh
  • Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair : Does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence? / Banerjee, Ambar; Beck, Catherine; Narula, Vimal K.; Linn, John; Noria, Sabrena; Zagol, Bradley; Mikami, Dean J.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.05.2012, p. 1264-1268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Banerjee, Ambar ; Beck, Catherine ; Narula, Vimal K. ; Linn, John ; Noria, Sabrena ; Zagol, Bradley ; Mikami, Dean J. / Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair : Does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence?. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2012 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 1264-1268.
@article{869ce6c0ea404fdc8959305edabf365e,
title = "Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: Does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence?",
abstract = "Background The advent of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) not only reduced the morbidity associated with open repair but also led to a decrease in the hernia recurrence rate. However, the rate continues to remain significant. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 193 patients who were treated with LVHR by two minimally invasive surgeons in a 24-month period. The patient population was broadly divided into two groups based on the laparoscopic repair of the fascial defect with mesh underlay, or with primary suture repair and mesh underlay (PSR ? MU). Patient demographics, rates of hernia recurrence, and other associated complications were compared between the two groups. Patient variables and the clinical outcomes were analyzed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. Results One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients underwent LVHR for incisional (n = 136), umbilical (n = 44), epigastric (n = 9), and parastomal (n = 4) hernia. Hernia recurrence was documented in eight patients (4.1{\%}). The mean follow-up period was 10.5 months (range 1-36 months). Incisional hernias accounted for all eight recurrences. The rate of recurrence in those treated with PSR ? MU was 3{\%} (two of 67 cases) in comparison with 4.8{\%} (six of 126 patients) associated with mesh alone. The rate of recurrence in the recurrent hernia group, treated with mesh only, was 10.5{\%} (four of 38 patients) compared with 4.8{\%} (one of 21 patients) in the PSR ? MU group. Conclusions Primary laparoscopic repair along with mesh placement for the management of ventral hernia was found to be effective in selected cases as evidenced by the low rate of recurrence when compared with conventional laparoscopic repair with mesh alone. Further retrospective and prospective studies, with larger patient enrollment, are warranted to confirm the benefit of this technique over traditional repair.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, Primary repair with mesh, Recurrence",
author = "Ambar Banerjee and Catherine Beck and Narula, {Vimal K.} and John Linn and Sabrena Noria and Bradley Zagol and Mikami, {Dean J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-011-2024-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1264--1268",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

T2 - Does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence?

AU - Banerjee, Ambar

AU - Beck, Catherine

AU - Narula, Vimal K.

AU - Linn, John

AU - Noria, Sabrena

AU - Zagol, Bradley

AU - Mikami, Dean J.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Background The advent of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) not only reduced the morbidity associated with open repair but also led to a decrease in the hernia recurrence rate. However, the rate continues to remain significant. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 193 patients who were treated with LVHR by two minimally invasive surgeons in a 24-month period. The patient population was broadly divided into two groups based on the laparoscopic repair of the fascial defect with mesh underlay, or with primary suture repair and mesh underlay (PSR ? MU). Patient demographics, rates of hernia recurrence, and other associated complications were compared between the two groups. Patient variables and the clinical outcomes were analyzed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. Results One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients underwent LVHR for incisional (n = 136), umbilical (n = 44), epigastric (n = 9), and parastomal (n = 4) hernia. Hernia recurrence was documented in eight patients (4.1%). The mean follow-up period was 10.5 months (range 1-36 months). Incisional hernias accounted for all eight recurrences. The rate of recurrence in those treated with PSR ? MU was 3% (two of 67 cases) in comparison with 4.8% (six of 126 patients) associated with mesh alone. The rate of recurrence in the recurrent hernia group, treated with mesh only, was 10.5% (four of 38 patients) compared with 4.8% (one of 21 patients) in the PSR ? MU group. Conclusions Primary laparoscopic repair along with mesh placement for the management of ventral hernia was found to be effective in selected cases as evidenced by the low rate of recurrence when compared with conventional laparoscopic repair with mesh alone. Further retrospective and prospective studies, with larger patient enrollment, are warranted to confirm the benefit of this technique over traditional repair.

AB - Background The advent of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) not only reduced the morbidity associated with open repair but also led to a decrease in the hernia recurrence rate. However, the rate continues to remain significant. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted on 193 patients who were treated with LVHR by two minimally invasive surgeons in a 24-month period. The patient population was broadly divided into two groups based on the laparoscopic repair of the fascial defect with mesh underlay, or with primary suture repair and mesh underlay (PSR ? MU). Patient demographics, rates of hernia recurrence, and other associated complications were compared between the two groups. Patient variables and the clinical outcomes were analyzed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. Results One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients underwent LVHR for incisional (n = 136), umbilical (n = 44), epigastric (n = 9), and parastomal (n = 4) hernia. Hernia recurrence was documented in eight patients (4.1%). The mean follow-up period was 10.5 months (range 1-36 months). Incisional hernias accounted for all eight recurrences. The rate of recurrence in those treated with PSR ? MU was 3% (two of 67 cases) in comparison with 4.8% (six of 126 patients) associated with mesh alone. The rate of recurrence in the recurrent hernia group, treated with mesh only, was 10.5% (four of 38 patients) compared with 4.8% (one of 21 patients) in the PSR ? MU group. Conclusions Primary laparoscopic repair along with mesh placement for the management of ventral hernia was found to be effective in selected cases as evidenced by the low rate of recurrence when compared with conventional laparoscopic repair with mesh alone. Further retrospective and prospective studies, with larger patient enrollment, are warranted to confirm the benefit of this technique over traditional repair.

KW - Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

KW - Primary repair with mesh

KW - Recurrence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863510008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863510008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-011-2024-3

DO - 10.1007/s00464-011-2024-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 22083330

AN - SCOPUS:84863510008

VL - 26

SP - 1264

EP - 1268

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 5

ER -