Legitimizing Paltry Contributions: On‐the‐spot vs. Mail‐in Requests

Robert Reeves, Ruthann M. Macolini, Roy C. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two versions of the legitimization‐of‐paltry‐contributions technique (Cialdini & Schroeder, 1976) were compared with respect to their effectiveness in generating compliance with requests for charitable donations. When immediate, on‐the‐spot donations were requested, the technique significantly increased compliance rates relative to control conditions; but when the respondents were asked to mail in their contributions, virtually none did. The results offered some support for an image‐maintenance explanation of the technique and were viewed as indicating that the effectiveness of the technique is reliable, but primarily under conditions that impose a high degree of situational constraint upon respondents. Implications of the results for door‐to‐door fundraising and for future research were discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)731-738
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume17
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

Fingerprint

Postal Service
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Legitimizing Paltry Contributions : On‐the‐spot vs. Mail‐in Requests. / Reeves, Robert; Macolini, Ruthann M.; Martin, Roy C.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 8, 01.01.1987, p. 731-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reeves, Robert ; Macolini, Ruthann M. ; Martin, Roy C. / Legitimizing Paltry Contributions : On‐the‐spot vs. Mail‐in Requests. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1987 ; Vol. 17, No. 8. pp. 731-738.
@article{cb35970bae3b49ea95515542550de4b6,
title = "Legitimizing Paltry Contributions: On‐the‐spot vs. Mail‐in Requests",
abstract = "Two versions of the legitimization‐of‐paltry‐contributions technique (Cialdini & Schroeder, 1976) were compared with respect to their effectiveness in generating compliance with requests for charitable donations. When immediate, on‐the‐spot donations were requested, the technique significantly increased compliance rates relative to control conditions; but when the respondents were asked to mail in their contributions, virtually none did. The results offered some support for an image‐maintenance explanation of the technique and were viewed as indicating that the effectiveness of the technique is reliable, but primarily under conditions that impose a high degree of situational constraint upon respondents. Implications of the results for door‐to‐door fundraising and for future research were discussed.",
author = "Robert Reeves and Macolini, {Ruthann M.} and Martin, {Roy C.}",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00336.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "731--738",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legitimizing Paltry Contributions

T2 - On‐the‐spot vs. Mail‐in Requests

AU - Reeves, Robert

AU - Macolini, Ruthann M.

AU - Martin, Roy C.

PY - 1987/1/1

Y1 - 1987/1/1

N2 - Two versions of the legitimization‐of‐paltry‐contributions technique (Cialdini & Schroeder, 1976) were compared with respect to their effectiveness in generating compliance with requests for charitable donations. When immediate, on‐the‐spot donations were requested, the technique significantly increased compliance rates relative to control conditions; but when the respondents were asked to mail in their contributions, virtually none did. The results offered some support for an image‐maintenance explanation of the technique and were viewed as indicating that the effectiveness of the technique is reliable, but primarily under conditions that impose a high degree of situational constraint upon respondents. Implications of the results for door‐to‐door fundraising and for future research were discussed.

AB - Two versions of the legitimization‐of‐paltry‐contributions technique (Cialdini & Schroeder, 1976) were compared with respect to their effectiveness in generating compliance with requests for charitable donations. When immediate, on‐the‐spot donations were requested, the technique significantly increased compliance rates relative to control conditions; but when the respondents were asked to mail in their contributions, virtually none did. The results offered some support for an image‐maintenance explanation of the technique and were viewed as indicating that the effectiveness of the technique is reliable, but primarily under conditions that impose a high degree of situational constraint upon respondents. Implications of the results for door‐to‐door fundraising and for future research were discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011307728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011307728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00336.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00336.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011307728

VL - 17

SP - 731

EP - 738

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 8

ER -