Management of delayed esophageal perforations after anterior cervical spinal surgery

Clinical article

Elias Dakwar, Juan S. Uribe, Tapan A. Padhya, Fernando Vale Diaz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. Delayed esophageal perforation is an uncommon but well-known complication after anterior cervical spine surgery. To the authors' knowledge there is no consensus to the optimal management of these patients in the literature. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective review of 5 cases involving patients who were referred to their institution for the management of delayed esophageal perforations after undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery for a variety of reasons. Results. The primary presenting symptom in all 5 patients was dysphagia. All patients initially underwent primary closure of the perforation with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. One patient required multiple surgeries to correct the perforation and ultimately required a free flap. Conclusions. The authors recommend a multidisciplinary approach that involves otolaryngological surgeons as well as spine surgeons. They recommend removal of all anterior hardware and believe that it is essential to the treatment of esophageal perforations. If the patient does not have evidence of fusion at the time of presentation, then posterior cervical instrumentation is a viable alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-325
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophageal Perforation
Spine
Free Tissue Flaps
Deglutition Disorders
Muscles

Keywords

  • Anterior cervical spine surgery
  • Esophageal perforation
  • Management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Management of delayed esophageal perforations after anterior cervical spinal surgery : Clinical article. / Dakwar, Elias; Uribe, Juan S.; Padhya, Tapan A.; Vale Diaz, Fernando.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 11, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 320-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d6732c3508f4b21a97d69427a85d74c,
title = "Management of delayed esophageal perforations after anterior cervical spinal surgery: Clinical article",
abstract = "Object. Delayed esophageal perforation is an uncommon but well-known complication after anterior cervical spine surgery. To the authors' knowledge there is no consensus to the optimal management of these patients in the literature. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective review of 5 cases involving patients who were referred to their institution for the management of delayed esophageal perforations after undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery for a variety of reasons. Results. The primary presenting symptom in all 5 patients was dysphagia. All patients initially underwent primary closure of the perforation with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. One patient required multiple surgeries to correct the perforation and ultimately required a free flap. Conclusions. The authors recommend a multidisciplinary approach that involves otolaryngological surgeons as well as spine surgeons. They recommend removal of all anterior hardware and believe that it is essential to the treatment of esophageal perforations. If the patient does not have evidence of fusion at the time of presentation, then posterior cervical instrumentation is a viable alternative.",
keywords = "Anterior cervical spine surgery, Esophageal perforation, Management",
author = "Elias Dakwar and Uribe, {Juan S.} and Padhya, {Tapan A.} and {Vale Diaz}, Fernando",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08522",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "320--325",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of delayed esophageal perforations after anterior cervical spinal surgery

T2 - Clinical article

AU - Dakwar, Elias

AU - Uribe, Juan S.

AU - Padhya, Tapan A.

AU - Vale Diaz, Fernando

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Object. Delayed esophageal perforation is an uncommon but well-known complication after anterior cervical spine surgery. To the authors' knowledge there is no consensus to the optimal management of these patients in the literature. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective review of 5 cases involving patients who were referred to their institution for the management of delayed esophageal perforations after undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery for a variety of reasons. Results. The primary presenting symptom in all 5 patients was dysphagia. All patients initially underwent primary closure of the perforation with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. One patient required multiple surgeries to correct the perforation and ultimately required a free flap. Conclusions. The authors recommend a multidisciplinary approach that involves otolaryngological surgeons as well as spine surgeons. They recommend removal of all anterior hardware and believe that it is essential to the treatment of esophageal perforations. If the patient does not have evidence of fusion at the time of presentation, then posterior cervical instrumentation is a viable alternative.

AB - Object. Delayed esophageal perforation is an uncommon but well-known complication after anterior cervical spine surgery. To the authors' knowledge there is no consensus to the optimal management of these patients in the literature. Methods. The authors performed a retrospective review of 5 cases involving patients who were referred to their institution for the management of delayed esophageal perforations after undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery for a variety of reasons. Results. The primary presenting symptom in all 5 patients was dysphagia. All patients initially underwent primary closure of the perforation with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. One patient required multiple surgeries to correct the perforation and ultimately required a free flap. Conclusions. The authors recommend a multidisciplinary approach that involves otolaryngological surgeons as well as spine surgeons. They recommend removal of all anterior hardware and believe that it is essential to the treatment of esophageal perforations. If the patient does not have evidence of fusion at the time of presentation, then posterior cervical instrumentation is a viable alternative.

KW - Anterior cervical spine surgery

KW - Esophageal perforation

KW - Management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70049091959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70049091959&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08522

DO - 10.3171/2009.3.SPINE08522

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 320

EP - 325

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 3

ER -