Mandatory insurance coverage and hospital productivity in Massachusetts: Bending the curve?

Mark Andrew Thompson, Timothy R. Huerta, Eric W. Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to examine whether universal insurance coverage mandates lead to a more productive use of hospital resources. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' case mix index for fiscal years 2005 through 2008 were used. STUDY DESIGN:: A Malmquist approach was used to assess hospitals' productivity in the United States and Massachusetts over the sample period. Propensity score matching is used to "simulate" a randomized control group of hospitals from other markets to compare with Massachusetts. Comparisons are then made to examine if productivity differences are due to universal health insurance coverage mandate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: In the early stages, Massachusetts' coverage mandates lead to a significant drop in hospitals' productivity relative to comparable facilities in other states. In 2008, Massachusetts functioned 3.53% below its 2005 level, whereas facilities across the United States have seen a 4.06% increase over the same period. CONCLUSIONS:: If the individual mandate is implemented nationwide, the Massachusetts' experience indicates that a near-term decrease in overall hospital productivity will occur. As such, current cost estimates of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's impact on overall health spending are potentially understated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-300
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Insurance Coverage
American Hospital Association
Universal Coverage
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Propensity Score
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Health Insurance
Insurance
Productivity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Control Groups
Health
Mandate

Keywords

  • data envelopment analysis
  • efficiency
  • health policy
  • hospitals
  • insurance coverage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Mandatory insurance coverage and hospital productivity in Massachusetts : Bending the curve? / Thompson, Mark Andrew; Huerta, Timothy R.; Ford, Eric W.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.01.2012, p. 294-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8677aef7d054001a879d58a197ff8de,
title = "Mandatory insurance coverage and hospital productivity in Massachusetts: Bending the curve?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to examine whether universal insurance coverage mandates lead to a more productive use of hospital resources. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' case mix index for fiscal years 2005 through 2008 were used. STUDY DESIGN:: A Malmquist approach was used to assess hospitals' productivity in the United States and Massachusetts over the sample period. Propensity score matching is used to {"}simulate{"} a randomized control group of hospitals from other markets to compare with Massachusetts. Comparisons are then made to examine if productivity differences are due to universal health insurance coverage mandate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: In the early stages, Massachusetts' coverage mandates lead to a significant drop in hospitals' productivity relative to comparable facilities in other states. In 2008, Massachusetts functioned 3.53{\%} below its 2005 level, whereas facilities across the United States have seen a 4.06{\%} increase over the same period. CONCLUSIONS:: If the individual mandate is implemented nationwide, the Massachusetts' experience indicates that a near-term decrease in overall hospital productivity will occur. As such, current cost estimates of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's impact on overall health spending are potentially understated.",
keywords = "data envelopment analysis, efficiency, health policy, hospitals, insurance coverage",
author = "Thompson, {Mark Andrew} and Huerta, {Timothy R.} and Ford, {Eric W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HCM.0b013e318242d0ba",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "294--300",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandatory insurance coverage and hospital productivity in Massachusetts

T2 - Bending the curve?

AU - Thompson, Mark Andrew

AU - Huerta, Timothy R.

AU - Ford, Eric W.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to examine whether universal insurance coverage mandates lead to a more productive use of hospital resources. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' case mix index for fiscal years 2005 through 2008 were used. STUDY DESIGN:: A Malmquist approach was used to assess hospitals' productivity in the United States and Massachusetts over the sample period. Propensity score matching is used to "simulate" a randomized control group of hospitals from other markets to compare with Massachusetts. Comparisons are then made to examine if productivity differences are due to universal health insurance coverage mandate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: In the early stages, Massachusetts' coverage mandates lead to a significant drop in hospitals' productivity relative to comparable facilities in other states. In 2008, Massachusetts functioned 3.53% below its 2005 level, whereas facilities across the United States have seen a 4.06% increase over the same period. CONCLUSIONS:: If the individual mandate is implemented nationwide, the Massachusetts' experience indicates that a near-term decrease in overall hospital productivity will occur. As such, current cost estimates of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's impact on overall health spending are potentially understated.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to examine whether universal insurance coverage mandates lead to a more productive use of hospital resources. DATA SOURCES:: The American Hospital Association's Annual Survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' case mix index for fiscal years 2005 through 2008 were used. STUDY DESIGN:: A Malmquist approach was used to assess hospitals' productivity in the United States and Massachusetts over the sample period. Propensity score matching is used to "simulate" a randomized control group of hospitals from other markets to compare with Massachusetts. Comparisons are then made to examine if productivity differences are due to universal health insurance coverage mandate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:: In the early stages, Massachusetts' coverage mandates lead to a significant drop in hospitals' productivity relative to comparable facilities in other states. In 2008, Massachusetts functioned 3.53% below its 2005 level, whereas facilities across the United States have seen a 4.06% increase over the same period. CONCLUSIONS:: If the individual mandate is implemented nationwide, the Massachusetts' experience indicates that a near-term decrease in overall hospital productivity will occur. As such, current cost estimates of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's impact on overall health spending are potentially understated.

KW - data envelopment analysis

KW - efficiency

KW - health policy

KW - hospitals

KW - insurance coverage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866459616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866459616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318242d0ba

DO - 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318242d0ba

M3 - Article

C2 - 22728579

AN - SCOPUS:84866459616

VL - 37

SP - 294

EP - 300

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 4

ER -