Markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT versus minimally suprathreshold bilateral ECT: Antidepressant and memory effects

W. Vaughn McCall, Aaron Dunn, Peter B. Rosenquist, Doreen Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Right unilateral (RUL) ECT is reported to have fewer memory side effects than bilateral (BL) ECT. We compared RUL ECT at eight times the seizure threshold (ST) against BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Adults with major depression were randomly assigned to RUL ECT at eight times ST or BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Blinded ratings of mood and memory were made before ECT, 1 to 3 days after the final ECT, and at 2 and 4 weeks after ECT. Forty patients received RUL and 37 received BL ECT. The antidepressant response rate was not significantly different for the RUL and BL groups (60% vs. 73%). Sustained antidepressant response, accompanied by recovery from anterograde memory side effects, was seen through the first month with both treatments. Measures of mood and memory were not significantly different for the two groups at any time point. The modest sample sizes of this study do not rule out a type II error in the detection of small but meaningful differences between assigned treatments. Also, the period of post-ECT observation consisted of 1 month of naturalistic treatment. Both RUL ECT at eight times the ST and BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST produce similar mood and memory effects. Both forms of ECT produced acceptable antidepressant response rates and only transient anterograde amnesia. No clear advantage emerged for either form of ECT, and both are justifiable as firstline techniques of ECT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-129
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of ECT
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 30 2002

Fingerprint

Antidepressive Agents
Seizures
Anterograde Amnesia
Patient Rights
Sample Size
Observation
Depression

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Electroconvulsive therapy
  • Electrode placement
  • Memory
  • Stimulus dose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT versus minimally suprathreshold bilateral ECT : Antidepressant and memory effects. / McCall, W. Vaughn; Dunn, Aaron; Rosenquist, Peter B.; Hughes, Doreen.

In: Journal of ECT, Vol. 18, No. 3, 30.10.2002, p. 126-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7fc2e93458a84c0399910b3eb90a202b,
title = "Markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT versus minimally suprathreshold bilateral ECT: Antidepressant and memory effects",
abstract = "Right unilateral (RUL) ECT is reported to have fewer memory side effects than bilateral (BL) ECT. We compared RUL ECT at eight times the seizure threshold (ST) against BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Adults with major depression were randomly assigned to RUL ECT at eight times ST or BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Blinded ratings of mood and memory were made before ECT, 1 to 3 days after the final ECT, and at 2 and 4 weeks after ECT. Forty patients received RUL and 37 received BL ECT. The antidepressant response rate was not significantly different for the RUL and BL groups (60{\%} vs. 73{\%}). Sustained antidepressant response, accompanied by recovery from anterograde memory side effects, was seen through the first month with both treatments. Measures of mood and memory were not significantly different for the two groups at any time point. The modest sample sizes of this study do not rule out a type II error in the detection of small but meaningful differences between assigned treatments. Also, the period of post-ECT observation consisted of 1 month of naturalistic treatment. Both RUL ECT at eight times the ST and BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST produce similar mood and memory effects. Both forms of ECT produced acceptable antidepressant response rates and only transient anterograde amnesia. No clear advantage emerged for either form of ECT, and both are justifiable as firstline techniques of ECT.",
keywords = "Depression, Electroconvulsive therapy, Electrode placement, Memory, Stimulus dose",
author = "McCall, {W. Vaughn} and Aaron Dunn and Rosenquist, {Peter B.} and Doreen Hughes",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1097/00124509-200209000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "126--129",
journal = "Journal of ECT",
issn = "1095-0680",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Markedly suprathreshold right unilateral ECT versus minimally suprathreshold bilateral ECT

T2 - Antidepressant and memory effects

AU - McCall, W. Vaughn

AU - Dunn, Aaron

AU - Rosenquist, Peter B.

AU - Hughes, Doreen

PY - 2002/10/30

Y1 - 2002/10/30

N2 - Right unilateral (RUL) ECT is reported to have fewer memory side effects than bilateral (BL) ECT. We compared RUL ECT at eight times the seizure threshold (ST) against BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Adults with major depression were randomly assigned to RUL ECT at eight times ST or BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Blinded ratings of mood and memory were made before ECT, 1 to 3 days after the final ECT, and at 2 and 4 weeks after ECT. Forty patients received RUL and 37 received BL ECT. The antidepressant response rate was not significantly different for the RUL and BL groups (60% vs. 73%). Sustained antidepressant response, accompanied by recovery from anterograde memory side effects, was seen through the first month with both treatments. Measures of mood and memory were not significantly different for the two groups at any time point. The modest sample sizes of this study do not rule out a type II error in the detection of small but meaningful differences between assigned treatments. Also, the period of post-ECT observation consisted of 1 month of naturalistic treatment. Both RUL ECT at eight times the ST and BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST produce similar mood and memory effects. Both forms of ECT produced acceptable antidepressant response rates and only transient anterograde amnesia. No clear advantage emerged for either form of ECT, and both are justifiable as firstline techniques of ECT.

AB - Right unilateral (RUL) ECT is reported to have fewer memory side effects than bilateral (BL) ECT. We compared RUL ECT at eight times the seizure threshold (ST) against BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Adults with major depression were randomly assigned to RUL ECT at eight times ST or BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST. Blinded ratings of mood and memory were made before ECT, 1 to 3 days after the final ECT, and at 2 and 4 weeks after ECT. Forty patients received RUL and 37 received BL ECT. The antidepressant response rate was not significantly different for the RUL and BL groups (60% vs. 73%). Sustained antidepressant response, accompanied by recovery from anterograde memory side effects, was seen through the first month with both treatments. Measures of mood and memory were not significantly different for the two groups at any time point. The modest sample sizes of this study do not rule out a type II error in the detection of small but meaningful differences between assigned treatments. Also, the period of post-ECT observation consisted of 1 month of naturalistic treatment. Both RUL ECT at eight times the ST and BL ECT at 1.5 times the ST produce similar mood and memory effects. Both forms of ECT produced acceptable antidepressant response rates and only transient anterograde amnesia. No clear advantage emerged for either form of ECT, and both are justifiable as firstline techniques of ECT.

KW - Depression

KW - Electroconvulsive therapy

KW - Electrode placement

KW - Memory

KW - Stimulus dose

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036400071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036400071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00124509-200209000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00124509-200209000-00003

M3 - Article

C2 - 12394530

AN - SCOPUS:0036400071

VL - 18

SP - 126

EP - 129

JO - Journal of ECT

JF - Journal of ECT

SN - 1095-0680

IS - 3

ER -