Medicolegal aspects

Richard Pawl

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Part 1: Introduction: Discussing the law in the context of cardiovascular resuscitation would seem to involve a small number of topics. Most commonly, one might consider the malpractice consequences of negligence in the conduct of medical personnel performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a dying patient. Certainly, malpractice law is a legal aspect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Yet, because of the nature of the act of CPR, it rarely, alone, becomes the focus of malpractice litigation. Most commonly, malpractice litigation focuses upon the alleged malpractice that leads up to a patient 's resuscitation. However, when the resuscitative efforts of medical professionals are the focus of a malpractice suit, the legal theories may be similar to those one may find in other malpractice litigation (e.g., negligent administration of drugs or negligently performing procedures) to more unique causes of action that arise from the resuscitation of a patient with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, such as the wrongful life legal complaint when the patient designated as a “DNR patient” is successfully resuscitated. Indeed, the more one delves into topics related to the law and CPR, the more one finds that to do adequate justice to the topic one must study the bioethics of death and dying and the evolution of advanced directives and how they apply to all patients - competent and incompetent alike. Because the law relating to death and dying is at the cusp of the interface between bioethics and the law, one must also pursue an understanding of the evolution of our laws as they relate to personhood, self-autonomy, and privacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCardiac Arrest
Subtitle of host publicationThe Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages1226-1243
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780511544828
ISBN (Print)05218470041, 9780521847001
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Jurisprudence
Resuscitation
Bioethics
Wrongful Life
Resuscitation Orders
Personhood
Privacy
Social Justice
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Pawl, R. (2007). Medicolegal aspects. In Cardiac Arrest: The Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine (pp. 1226-1243). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544828.070

Medicolegal aspects. / Pawl, Richard.

Cardiac Arrest: The Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 1226-1243.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Pawl, R 2007, Medicolegal aspects. in Cardiac Arrest: The Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1226-1243. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544828.070
Pawl R. Medicolegal aspects. In Cardiac Arrest: The Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 1226-1243 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544828.070
Pawl, Richard. / Medicolegal aspects. Cardiac Arrest: The Science and Practice of Resuscitation Medicine. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 1226-1243
@inbook{0a40535865f64c3c9d27525f0cdfe85b,
title = "Medicolegal aspects",
abstract = "Part 1: Introduction: Discussing the law in the context of cardiovascular resuscitation would seem to involve a small number of topics. Most commonly, one might consider the malpractice consequences of negligence in the conduct of medical personnel performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a dying patient. Certainly, malpractice law is a legal aspect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Yet, because of the nature of the act of CPR, it rarely, alone, becomes the focus of malpractice litigation. Most commonly, malpractice litigation focuses upon the alleged malpractice that leads up to a patient 's resuscitation. However, when the resuscitative efforts of medical professionals are the focus of a malpractice suit, the legal theories may be similar to those one may find in other malpractice litigation (e.g., negligent administration of drugs or negligently performing procedures) to more unique causes of action that arise from the resuscitation of a patient with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, such as the wrongful life legal complaint when the patient designated as a “DNR patient” is successfully resuscitated. Indeed, the more one delves into topics related to the law and CPR, the more one finds that to do adequate justice to the topic one must study the bioethics of death and dying and the evolution of advanced directives and how they apply to all patients - competent and incompetent alike. Because the law relating to death and dying is at the cusp of the interface between bioethics and the law, one must also pursue an understanding of the evolution of our laws as they relate to personhood, self-autonomy, and privacy.",
author = "Richard Pawl",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511544828.070",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "05218470041",
pages = "1226--1243",
booktitle = "Cardiac Arrest",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Medicolegal aspects

AU - Pawl, Richard

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Part 1: Introduction: Discussing the law in the context of cardiovascular resuscitation would seem to involve a small number of topics. Most commonly, one might consider the malpractice consequences of negligence in the conduct of medical personnel performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a dying patient. Certainly, malpractice law is a legal aspect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Yet, because of the nature of the act of CPR, it rarely, alone, becomes the focus of malpractice litigation. Most commonly, malpractice litigation focuses upon the alleged malpractice that leads up to a patient 's resuscitation. However, when the resuscitative efforts of medical professionals are the focus of a malpractice suit, the legal theories may be similar to those one may find in other malpractice litigation (e.g., negligent administration of drugs or negligently performing procedures) to more unique causes of action that arise from the resuscitation of a patient with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, such as the wrongful life legal complaint when the patient designated as a “DNR patient” is successfully resuscitated. Indeed, the more one delves into topics related to the law and CPR, the more one finds that to do adequate justice to the topic one must study the bioethics of death and dying and the evolution of advanced directives and how they apply to all patients - competent and incompetent alike. Because the law relating to death and dying is at the cusp of the interface between bioethics and the law, one must also pursue an understanding of the evolution of our laws as they relate to personhood, self-autonomy, and privacy.

AB - Part 1: Introduction: Discussing the law in the context of cardiovascular resuscitation would seem to involve a small number of topics. Most commonly, one might consider the malpractice consequences of negligence in the conduct of medical personnel performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a dying patient. Certainly, malpractice law is a legal aspect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Yet, because of the nature of the act of CPR, it rarely, alone, becomes the focus of malpractice litigation. Most commonly, malpractice litigation focuses upon the alleged malpractice that leads up to a patient 's resuscitation. However, when the resuscitative efforts of medical professionals are the focus of a malpractice suit, the legal theories may be similar to those one may find in other malpractice litigation (e.g., negligent administration of drugs or negligently performing procedures) to more unique causes of action that arise from the resuscitation of a patient with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, such as the wrongful life legal complaint when the patient designated as a “DNR patient” is successfully resuscitated. Indeed, the more one delves into topics related to the law and CPR, the more one finds that to do adequate justice to the topic one must study the bioethics of death and dying and the evolution of advanced directives and how they apply to all patients - competent and incompetent alike. Because the law relating to death and dying is at the cusp of the interface between bioethics and the law, one must also pursue an understanding of the evolution of our laws as they relate to personhood, self-autonomy, and privacy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927027974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927027974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511544828.070

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511544828.070

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927027974

SN - 05218470041

SN - 9780521847001

SP - 1226

EP - 1243

BT - Cardiac Arrest

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -