Membrane-induced secondary structures of neuropeptides: A comparison of the solution conformations adopted by agonists and antagonists of the mammalian tachykinin NK1 receptor

Tracy L. Whitehead, Sharon D. McNair, Chad E. Hadden, John K. Young, Rickey Paige Hicks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present what we believe to be the first documented example of an inducement of distinctly different secondary structure types onto agonists and antagonists selective for the same G-coupled protein receptor using the same membrane-model matrix wherein the induced structures are consistent with those suggested to be biologically active by extensive analogue studies and conventional binding assays. 1H NMR chemical shift assignments for the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective agonists α-neurokinin (NKA) and β- neurokinin (NKB) as well as the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective antagonists [D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP and [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP have been determined at 600 MHz in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles. The SDS micelle system simulates the membrane-interface environment the peptide experiences when in the proximity of the membrane-embedded receptor, allowing for conformational studies that are a rough approximation of in vivo conditions. Two-dimensional NMR techniques were used to assign proton resonances, and interproton distances were estimated from the observed nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs). The experimental distances were used as constraints in a molecular dynamics and simulated annealing protocol using the modeling package DISCOVER to generate three-dimensional structures of the two agonists and two antagonists when present in a membrane-model environment to determine possible prebinding ligand conformations. It was determined that (1) NKA is helical from residues 6 to 9, with an extended N-terminus; (2) NKB is helical from residues 4 to 10, with an extended N-terminus; (3) [D- Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP has poorly defined helical properties in the midregion and a β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-9); and (4) [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP has a helical structure in the midregion (residues 4-6) and a well-defined β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-10). Attempts have been made to correlate the observed conformational differences between the agonists and antagonists to their binding potencies and biological activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1497-1506
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Medicinal Chemistry
Volume41
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 23 1998

Fingerprint

Tachykinin Receptors
Neuropeptides
Membranes
Micelles
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate
Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein D
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
Protons
Ligands
Peptides

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Drug Discovery

Cite this

Membrane-induced secondary structures of neuropeptides : A comparison of the solution conformations adopted by agonists and antagonists of the mammalian tachykinin NK1 receptor. / Whitehead, Tracy L.; McNair, Sharon D.; Hadden, Chad E.; Young, John K.; Hicks, Rickey Paige.

In: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 9, 23.04.1998, p. 1497-1506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Whitehead, Tracy L. ; McNair, Sharon D. ; Hadden, Chad E. ; Young, John K. ; Hicks, Rickey Paige. / Membrane-induced secondary structures of neuropeptides : A comparison of the solution conformations adopted by agonists and antagonists of the mammalian tachykinin NK1 receptor. In: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1998 ; Vol. 41, No. 9. pp. 1497-1506.
@article{e39b195df37e482c8f050fa861245fbb,
title = "Membrane-induced secondary structures of neuropeptides: A comparison of the solution conformations adopted by agonists and antagonists of the mammalian tachykinin NK1 receptor",
abstract = "We present what we believe to be the first documented example of an inducement of distinctly different secondary structure types onto agonists and antagonists selective for the same G-coupled protein receptor using the same membrane-model matrix wherein the induced structures are consistent with those suggested to be biologically active by extensive analogue studies and conventional binding assays. 1H NMR chemical shift assignments for the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective agonists α-neurokinin (NKA) and β- neurokinin (NKB) as well as the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective antagonists [D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP and [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP have been determined at 600 MHz in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles. The SDS micelle system simulates the membrane-interface environment the peptide experiences when in the proximity of the membrane-embedded receptor, allowing for conformational studies that are a rough approximation of in vivo conditions. Two-dimensional NMR techniques were used to assign proton resonances, and interproton distances were estimated from the observed nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs). The experimental distances were used as constraints in a molecular dynamics and simulated annealing protocol using the modeling package DISCOVER to generate three-dimensional structures of the two agonists and two antagonists when present in a membrane-model environment to determine possible prebinding ligand conformations. It was determined that (1) NKA is helical from residues 6 to 9, with an extended N-terminus; (2) NKB is helical from residues 4 to 10, with an extended N-terminus; (3) [D- Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP has poorly defined helical properties in the midregion and a β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-9); and (4) [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP has a helical structure in the midregion (residues 4-6) and a well-defined β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-10). Attempts have been made to correlate the observed conformational differences between the agonists and antagonists to their binding potencies and biological activity.",
author = "Whitehead, {Tracy L.} and McNair, {Sharon D.} and Hadden, {Chad E.} and Young, {John K.} and Hicks, {Rickey Paige}",
year = "1998",
month = "4",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1021/jm970789x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1497--1506",
journal = "Journal of Medicinal Chemistry",
issn = "0022-2623",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Membrane-induced secondary structures of neuropeptides

T2 - A comparison of the solution conformations adopted by agonists and antagonists of the mammalian tachykinin NK1 receptor

AU - Whitehead, Tracy L.

AU - McNair, Sharon D.

AU - Hadden, Chad E.

AU - Young, John K.

AU - Hicks, Rickey Paige

PY - 1998/4/23

Y1 - 1998/4/23

N2 - We present what we believe to be the first documented example of an inducement of distinctly different secondary structure types onto agonists and antagonists selective for the same G-coupled protein receptor using the same membrane-model matrix wherein the induced structures are consistent with those suggested to be biologically active by extensive analogue studies and conventional binding assays. 1H NMR chemical shift assignments for the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective agonists α-neurokinin (NKA) and β- neurokinin (NKB) as well as the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective antagonists [D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP and [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP have been determined at 600 MHz in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles. The SDS micelle system simulates the membrane-interface environment the peptide experiences when in the proximity of the membrane-embedded receptor, allowing for conformational studies that are a rough approximation of in vivo conditions. Two-dimensional NMR techniques were used to assign proton resonances, and interproton distances were estimated from the observed nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs). The experimental distances were used as constraints in a molecular dynamics and simulated annealing protocol using the modeling package DISCOVER to generate three-dimensional structures of the two agonists and two antagonists when present in a membrane-model environment to determine possible prebinding ligand conformations. It was determined that (1) NKA is helical from residues 6 to 9, with an extended N-terminus; (2) NKB is helical from residues 4 to 10, with an extended N-terminus; (3) [D- Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP has poorly defined helical properties in the midregion and a β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-9); and (4) [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP has a helical structure in the midregion (residues 4-6) and a well-defined β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-10). Attempts have been made to correlate the observed conformational differences between the agonists and antagonists to their binding potencies and biological activity.

AB - We present what we believe to be the first documented example of an inducement of distinctly different secondary structure types onto agonists and antagonists selective for the same G-coupled protein receptor using the same membrane-model matrix wherein the induced structures are consistent with those suggested to be biologically active by extensive analogue studies and conventional binding assays. 1H NMR chemical shift assignments for the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective agonists α-neurokinin (NKA) and β- neurokinin (NKB) as well as the mammalian NK1 receptor-selective antagonists [D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP and [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP have been determined at 600 MHz in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles. The SDS micelle system simulates the membrane-interface environment the peptide experiences when in the proximity of the membrane-embedded receptor, allowing for conformational studies that are a rough approximation of in vivo conditions. Two-dimensional NMR techniques were used to assign proton resonances, and interproton distances were estimated from the observed nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs). The experimental distances were used as constraints in a molecular dynamics and simulated annealing protocol using the modeling package DISCOVER to generate three-dimensional structures of the two agonists and two antagonists when present in a membrane-model environment to determine possible prebinding ligand conformations. It was determined that (1) NKA is helical from residues 6 to 9, with an extended N-terminus; (2) NKB is helical from residues 4 to 10, with an extended N-terminus; (3) [D- Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]SP has poorly defined helical properties in the midregion and a β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-9); and (4) [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP has a helical structure in the midregion (residues 4-6) and a well-defined β-turn structure in the C-terminus (residues 6-10). Attempts have been made to correlate the observed conformational differences between the agonists and antagonists to their binding potencies and biological activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032560139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032560139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/jm970789x

DO - 10.1021/jm970789x

M3 - Article

C2 - 9554882

AN - SCOPUS:0032560139

VL - 41

SP - 1497

EP - 1506

JO - Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

JF - Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

SN - 0022-2623

IS - 9

ER -