Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease

Jonathan M. Meyer, Donald C. Goff, Joseph Patrick McEvoy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The understanding of cardiovascular (CV) risk continues to evolve, as does the ongoing search for novel biomarkers to improve risk prediction. The use of new markers for lipid metabolism and systemic inflammation has yet to be fully integrated into CV risk assessment algorithms, but emerging data document the potential utility of novel biomarkers in refining CV risk estimates. For now, clinical CV assessment continues to be based on well-established cardiac risk factors derived from cohort studies, such as the community-based Framingham Heart Study (FHS), the longitudinal nature of which have provided robust means to assess the relative impact of clinical factors on cardiac morbidity and mortality. The additive CV effects of cigarette smoking, hypertension, total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been found to predict the risk of major cardiac events (angina, myocardial infarction [MI], and sudden cardiac death) over a 10 year period, and can be calculated with empirically derived CV risk algorithms. The FHS derived formula may overestimate CV risk in Hispanic men and Native Americans compared to Whites and African-Americans, but is considered a standard and important method for clinical CV risk calculations.Although the standard FHS algorithm and the gender-specific charts from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) are based on extensive clinical data, there are limitations to these predictive models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAntipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia
Subtitle of host publicationThe CATIE Project
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages173-188
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780511712265
ISBN (Print)9780521895330
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Cardiovascular Diseases
Biomarkers
Cholesterol
North American Indians
Sudden Cardiac Death
Lipid Metabolism
Hispanic Americans
African Americans
HDL Cholesterol
Longitudinal Studies
Cohort Studies
Smoking
Myocardial Infarction
Hypertension
Inflammation
Morbidity
Education
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Meyer, J. M., Goff, D. C., & McEvoy, J. P. (2010). Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease. In Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia: The CATIE Project (pp. 173-188). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712265.011

Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease. / Meyer, Jonathan M.; Goff, Donald C.; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick.

Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia: The CATIE Project. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 173-188.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Meyer, JM, Goff, DC & McEvoy, JP 2010, Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease. in Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia: The CATIE Project. Cambridge University Press, pp. 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712265.011
Meyer JM, Goff DC, McEvoy JP. Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease. In Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia: The CATIE Project. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 173-188 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712265.011
Meyer, Jonathan M. ; Goff, Donald C. ; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick. / Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease. Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia: The CATIE Project. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 173-188
@inbook{ccf6772614904531a86ae41affa50742,
title = "Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease",
abstract = "The understanding of cardiovascular (CV) risk continues to evolve, as does the ongoing search for novel biomarkers to improve risk prediction. The use of new markers for lipid metabolism and systemic inflammation has yet to be fully integrated into CV risk assessment algorithms, but emerging data document the potential utility of novel biomarkers in refining CV risk estimates. For now, clinical CV assessment continues to be based on well-established cardiac risk factors derived from cohort studies, such as the community-based Framingham Heart Study (FHS), the longitudinal nature of which have provided robust means to assess the relative impact of clinical factors on cardiac morbidity and mortality. The additive CV effects of cigarette smoking, hypertension, total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been found to predict the risk of major cardiac events (angina, myocardial infarction [MI], and sudden cardiac death) over a 10 year period, and can be calculated with empirically derived CV risk algorithms. The FHS derived formula may overestimate CV risk in Hispanic men and Native Americans compared to Whites and African-Americans, but is considered a standard and important method for clinical CV risk calculations.Although the standard FHS algorithm and the gender-specific charts from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) are based on extensive clinical data, there are limitations to these predictive models.",
author = "Meyer, {Jonathan M.} and Goff, {Donald C.} and McEvoy, {Joseph Patrick}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511712265.011",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521895330",
pages = "173--188",
booktitle = "Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Metabolic side effects and risk of cardiovascular disease

AU - Meyer, Jonathan M.

AU - Goff, Donald C.

AU - McEvoy, Joseph Patrick

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The understanding of cardiovascular (CV) risk continues to evolve, as does the ongoing search for novel biomarkers to improve risk prediction. The use of new markers for lipid metabolism and systemic inflammation has yet to be fully integrated into CV risk assessment algorithms, but emerging data document the potential utility of novel biomarkers in refining CV risk estimates. For now, clinical CV assessment continues to be based on well-established cardiac risk factors derived from cohort studies, such as the community-based Framingham Heart Study (FHS), the longitudinal nature of which have provided robust means to assess the relative impact of clinical factors on cardiac morbidity and mortality. The additive CV effects of cigarette smoking, hypertension, total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been found to predict the risk of major cardiac events (angina, myocardial infarction [MI], and sudden cardiac death) over a 10 year period, and can be calculated with empirically derived CV risk algorithms. The FHS derived formula may overestimate CV risk in Hispanic men and Native Americans compared to Whites and African-Americans, but is considered a standard and important method for clinical CV risk calculations.Although the standard FHS algorithm and the gender-specific charts from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) are based on extensive clinical data, there are limitations to these predictive models.

AB - The understanding of cardiovascular (CV) risk continues to evolve, as does the ongoing search for novel biomarkers to improve risk prediction. The use of new markers for lipid metabolism and systemic inflammation has yet to be fully integrated into CV risk assessment algorithms, but emerging data document the potential utility of novel biomarkers in refining CV risk estimates. For now, clinical CV assessment continues to be based on well-established cardiac risk factors derived from cohort studies, such as the community-based Framingham Heart Study (FHS), the longitudinal nature of which have provided robust means to assess the relative impact of clinical factors on cardiac morbidity and mortality. The additive CV effects of cigarette smoking, hypertension, total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been found to predict the risk of major cardiac events (angina, myocardial infarction [MI], and sudden cardiac death) over a 10 year period, and can be calculated with empirically derived CV risk algorithms. The FHS derived formula may overestimate CV risk in Hispanic men and Native Americans compared to Whites and African-Americans, but is considered a standard and important method for clinical CV risk calculations.Although the standard FHS algorithm and the gender-specific charts from the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) are based on extensive clinical data, there are limitations to these predictive models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927048218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927048218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511712265.011

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511712265.011

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84927048218

SN - 9780521895330

SP - 173

EP - 188

BT - Antipsychotic Trials in Schizophrenia

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -