Methanogenic flora is associated with altered colonic transit but not stool characteristics in constipation without IBS

Ashok Attaluri, Michelle Jackson, Jessica Valestin, Satish Sanku Chander Rao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: About 35% of humans have methane-producing gut flora. Methane-producing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subjects are generally constipated. In animal models, methane infusion slows intestinal transit. Whether methanogenic flora alters colonic transit or stool characteristics and its relationship to constipation is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and association of methanogenic flora in patients with slow transit (ST) constipation and normal transit (NT) constipation and non-constipated controls.Methods: Ninety-six consecutive subjects with chronic constipation (CC) (Rome III) were evaluated with radio-opaque marker (ROM) transit studies and were classified as ST (>20% ROM retention) or NT. All constipated subjects and 106 non-constipated controls underwent breath tests to assess methane production. Baseline CH4 of ≥3 p.p.m. was used to define presence of methanogenic flora. Stool frequency and consistency were assessed using a prospective stool diary. Correlation analyses were performed.Results: Forty-eight subjects had ST and 48 had NT. Prevalence of methanogenic flora was higher (<P0.05) in ST (75%) compared to NT (44%) or controls (28%). ST patients had higher methane production compared to NT and controls (>P0.05). NT patients also produced more methane compared to controls (>P0.05). There was moderate(>P0.05) correlation among baseline, peak, and area under the curve (AUC) of methane response with colonic transit but not with stool characteristics.Conclusions: Presence of methanogenic flora is associated with CC. Methane production after carbohydrate challenge and its prevalence were higher in ST than NT, although stool characteristics were similar in both groups. Methane production correlated with colonic transit, suggesting an association with stool transport but not with stool characteristics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1407-1411
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume105
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Methane
Constipation
Breath Tests
Area Under Curve
Animal Models
Carbohydrates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Methanogenic flora is associated with altered colonic transit but not stool characteristics in constipation without IBS. / Attaluri, Ashok; Jackson, Michelle; Valestin, Jessica; Rao, Satish Sanku Chander.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 105, No. 6, 01.06.2010, p. 1407-1411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{664f08b5cb684c99a573bffad12365cc,
title = "Methanogenic flora is associated with altered colonic transit but not stool characteristics in constipation without IBS",
abstract = "Objectives: About 35{\%} of humans have methane-producing gut flora. Methane-producing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subjects are generally constipated. In animal models, methane infusion slows intestinal transit. Whether methanogenic flora alters colonic transit or stool characteristics and its relationship to constipation is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and association of methanogenic flora in patients with slow transit (ST) constipation and normal transit (NT) constipation and non-constipated controls.Methods: Ninety-six consecutive subjects with chronic constipation (CC) (Rome III) were evaluated with radio-opaque marker (ROM) transit studies and were classified as ST (>20{\%} ROM retention) or NT. All constipated subjects and 106 non-constipated controls underwent breath tests to assess methane production. Baseline CH4 of ≥3 p.p.m. was used to define presence of methanogenic flora. Stool frequency and consistency were assessed using a prospective stool diary. Correlation analyses were performed.Results: Forty-eight subjects had ST and 48 had NT. Prevalence of methanogenic flora was higher (<P0.05) in ST (75{\%}) compared to NT (44{\%}) or controls (28{\%}). ST patients had higher methane production compared to NT and controls (>P0.05). NT patients also produced more methane compared to controls (>P0.05). There was moderate(>P0.05) correlation among baseline, peak, and area under the curve (AUC) of methane response with colonic transit but not with stool characteristics.Conclusions: Presence of methanogenic flora is associated with CC. Methane production after carbohydrate challenge and its prevalence were higher in ST than NT, although stool characteristics were similar in both groups. Methane production correlated with colonic transit, suggesting an association with stool transport but not with stool characteristics.",
author = "Ashok Attaluri and Michelle Jackson and Jessica Valestin and Rao, {Satish Sanku Chander}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/ajg.2009.655",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "1407--1411",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methanogenic flora is associated with altered colonic transit but not stool characteristics in constipation without IBS

AU - Attaluri, Ashok

AU - Jackson, Michelle

AU - Valestin, Jessica

AU - Rao, Satish Sanku Chander

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Objectives: About 35% of humans have methane-producing gut flora. Methane-producing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subjects are generally constipated. In animal models, methane infusion slows intestinal transit. Whether methanogenic flora alters colonic transit or stool characteristics and its relationship to constipation is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and association of methanogenic flora in patients with slow transit (ST) constipation and normal transit (NT) constipation and non-constipated controls.Methods: Ninety-six consecutive subjects with chronic constipation (CC) (Rome III) were evaluated with radio-opaque marker (ROM) transit studies and were classified as ST (>20% ROM retention) or NT. All constipated subjects and 106 non-constipated controls underwent breath tests to assess methane production. Baseline CH4 of ≥3 p.p.m. was used to define presence of methanogenic flora. Stool frequency and consistency were assessed using a prospective stool diary. Correlation analyses were performed.Results: Forty-eight subjects had ST and 48 had NT. Prevalence of methanogenic flora was higher (<P0.05) in ST (75%) compared to NT (44%) or controls (28%). ST patients had higher methane production compared to NT and controls (>P0.05). NT patients also produced more methane compared to controls (>P0.05). There was moderate(>P0.05) correlation among baseline, peak, and area under the curve (AUC) of methane response with colonic transit but not with stool characteristics.Conclusions: Presence of methanogenic flora is associated with CC. Methane production after carbohydrate challenge and its prevalence were higher in ST than NT, although stool characteristics were similar in both groups. Methane production correlated with colonic transit, suggesting an association with stool transport but not with stool characteristics.

AB - Objectives: About 35% of humans have methane-producing gut flora. Methane-producing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) subjects are generally constipated. In animal models, methane infusion slows intestinal transit. Whether methanogenic flora alters colonic transit or stool characteristics and its relationship to constipation is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and association of methanogenic flora in patients with slow transit (ST) constipation and normal transit (NT) constipation and non-constipated controls.Methods: Ninety-six consecutive subjects with chronic constipation (CC) (Rome III) were evaluated with radio-opaque marker (ROM) transit studies and were classified as ST (>20% ROM retention) or NT. All constipated subjects and 106 non-constipated controls underwent breath tests to assess methane production. Baseline CH4 of ≥3 p.p.m. was used to define presence of methanogenic flora. Stool frequency and consistency were assessed using a prospective stool diary. Correlation analyses were performed.Results: Forty-eight subjects had ST and 48 had NT. Prevalence of methanogenic flora was higher (<P0.05) in ST (75%) compared to NT (44%) or controls (28%). ST patients had higher methane production compared to NT and controls (>P0.05). NT patients also produced more methane compared to controls (>P0.05). There was moderate(>P0.05) correlation among baseline, peak, and area under the curve (AUC) of methane response with colonic transit but not with stool characteristics.Conclusions: Presence of methanogenic flora is associated with CC. Methane production after carbohydrate challenge and its prevalence were higher in ST than NT, although stool characteristics were similar in both groups. Methane production correlated with colonic transit, suggesting an association with stool transport but not with stool characteristics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953230588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953230588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2009.655

DO - 10.1038/ajg.2009.655

M3 - Article

C2 - 19953090

AN - SCOPUS:77953230588

VL - 105

SP - 1407

EP - 1411

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 6

ER -