Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives

William W. Brackett, Larry D. Haisch, Megan G. Pearce, Martha G. Brackett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Statement of problem. Although they are widely available, there is insufficient information about the capability of self-etching adhesives in sealing the margins of resin composite restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed using a strong pH self-etching adhesive, an intermediate pH self-etching adhesive, and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer. Material and methods. Class V resin composite restorations (n = 8) were placed in prepared cavities in extracted human third molars using 2 self-etching dentin adhesives, Prompt L-Pop (Strong pH) or One-Up Bond F (Intermediate pH), and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. The restored teeth received 1000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time and were subsequently subjected to a methylene blue dye challenge and sectioned. The sectioned specimens were scored as demonstrating none, slight, or severe leakage (n=16). Ranked data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance at a 5% confidence level. Results. The only leakage observed was along gingival margins, with an incidence of 31% for Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F, and 50% for ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. Conclusion. No significant differences in marginal leakage were found among the adhesives tested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-45
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume91
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Adhesives
Third Molar
Methylene Blue
Dentin
Baths
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Coloring Agents
Hot Temperature
Water
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. / Brackett, William W.; Haisch, Larry D.; Pearce, Megan G.; Brackett, Martha G.

In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 91, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 42-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96ca28f684c64982b896fcd8b976d74e,
title = "Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives",
abstract = "Statement of problem. Although they are widely available, there is insufficient information about the capability of self-etching adhesives in sealing the margins of resin composite restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed using a strong pH self-etching adhesive, an intermediate pH self-etching adhesive, and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer. Material and methods. Class V resin composite restorations (n = 8) were placed in prepared cavities in extracted human third molars using 2 self-etching dentin adhesives, Prompt L-Pop (Strong pH) or One-Up Bond F (Intermediate pH), and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. The restored teeth received 1000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time and were subsequently subjected to a methylene blue dye challenge and sectioned. The sectioned specimens were scored as demonstrating none, slight, or severe leakage (n=16). Ranked data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance at a 5{\%} confidence level. Results. The only leakage observed was along gingival margins, with an incidence of 31{\%} for Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F, and 50{\%} for ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. Conclusion. No significant differences in marginal leakage were found among the adhesives tested.",
author = "Brackett, {William W.} and Haisch, {Larry D.} and Pearce, {Megan G.} and Brackett, {Martha G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "42--45",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives

AU - Brackett, William W.

AU - Haisch, Larry D.

AU - Pearce, Megan G.

AU - Brackett, Martha G.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Statement of problem. Although they are widely available, there is insufficient information about the capability of self-etching adhesives in sealing the margins of resin composite restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed using a strong pH self-etching adhesive, an intermediate pH self-etching adhesive, and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer. Material and methods. Class V resin composite restorations (n = 8) were placed in prepared cavities in extracted human third molars using 2 self-etching dentin adhesives, Prompt L-Pop (Strong pH) or One-Up Bond F (Intermediate pH), and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. The restored teeth received 1000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time and were subsequently subjected to a methylene blue dye challenge and sectioned. The sectioned specimens were scored as demonstrating none, slight, or severe leakage (n=16). Ranked data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance at a 5% confidence level. Results. The only leakage observed was along gingival margins, with an incidence of 31% for Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F, and 50% for ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. Conclusion. No significant differences in marginal leakage were found among the adhesives tested.

AB - Statement of problem. Although they are widely available, there is insufficient information about the capability of self-etching adhesives in sealing the margins of resin composite restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed using a strong pH self-etching adhesive, an intermediate pH self-etching adhesive, and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer. Material and methods. Class V resin composite restorations (n = 8) were placed in prepared cavities in extracted human third molars using 2 self-etching dentin adhesives, Prompt L-Pop (Strong pH) or One-Up Bond F (Intermediate pH), and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. The restored teeth received 1000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time and were subsequently subjected to a methylene blue dye challenge and sectioned. The sectioned specimens were scored as demonstrating none, slight, or severe leakage (n=16). Ranked data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance at a 5% confidence level. Results. The only leakage observed was along gingival margins, with an incidence of 31% for Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F, and 50% for ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. Conclusion. No significant differences in marginal leakage were found among the adhesives tested.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346461395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346461395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 42

EP - 45

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 1

ER -