Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces

Cecilia Goracci, Alvaro H. Cury, Amerigo Cantoro, Federica Papacchini, Franklin Chi Meng Tay, Marco Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

138 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate strength and morphology of the interface created on enamel and dentin by Panavia F 2.0 (P, Kuraray), RelyX Unicem (RU, 3M ESPE), and Maxeem (M, Sybron-Kerr), applied under two standardized clinically realistic seating pressures. Materials and Methods: Composite overlays (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) were luted on flat enamel or dentin surfaces of 48 extracted molars. During the initial 5-min self-curing period, a pressure of either 20 or 40 g/mm2 was maintained on the overlay. Curing was completed by light irradiation from the top of the overlay for 20 s. Microtensile sticks and specimens for SCM observations were obtained from the luted teeth. Bond strength data from enamel and dentin (MPa) were analyzed with separate two-way ANOVAs in order to assess the effect of cement type, luting pressure, and their interactions. Tukey's test was used for post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05), Results: The bond strengths (MPa) to dentin were: P 20 g/mm2 7.5 ± 3.7, 40 g/mm2 10.9 ± 4.5; RU 20 g/mm2 6.8 ± 2.6, 40 g/mm2 14.5 ± 5.3; M 20 g/mm2 4.1 ± 1.8, 40 g/mm2 5.2 ± 1.6. The bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were: P 20 g/mm2 25.2 ± 9.0, 40 g/mm2 30.7 ± 8.6; RU 20 g/mm2 10.7 ± 4.9, 40 g/mm2 11.1 ± 5; M 20 g/mm2 7.3 ± 3.1, 40 g/mm2 7.9 ± 3.2. Cement type, luting pressure, and the interaction of these two factors had significant influences on dentin bond strength, with RU and P outperforming M. RU and P significantly benefited from the increase in luting pressure. In enamel, the type of cement was a significant factor for adhesion, with P yielding the highest and M the lowest strength. The measured bond strengths corresponded with the morphological results. Conclusion: Interfacial strength and adaptation of self-etching and self-adhesive dual-curing cements are enhanced if a seating force greater than finger pressure is maintained throughout the initial self-curing period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-335
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume8
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 2 2006

Fingerprint

Resin Cements
Inlays
Dentin
Dental Enamel
Pressure
Adhesives
Fingers
Adhesive cement
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Light

Keywords

  • Interface
  • Microtensile bond strength
  • Scanning electron microscope
  • Seating force
  • Self-adhesive resin cement
  • Self-etching resin cement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics
  • Oral Surgery
  • Periodontics

Cite this

Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. / Goracci, Cecilia; Cury, Alvaro H.; Cantoro, Amerigo; Papacchini, Federica; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng; Ferrari, Marco.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 8, No. 5, 02.11.2006, p. 327-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c04b6de60b074d0f80afb8f7400bd691,
title = "Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate strength and morphology of the interface created on enamel and dentin by Panavia F 2.0 (P, Kuraray), RelyX Unicem (RU, 3M ESPE), and Maxeem (M, Sybron-Kerr), applied under two standardized clinically realistic seating pressures. Materials and Methods: Composite overlays (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) were luted on flat enamel or dentin surfaces of 48 extracted molars. During the initial 5-min self-curing period, a pressure of either 20 or 40 g/mm2 was maintained on the overlay. Curing was completed by light irradiation from the top of the overlay for 20 s. Microtensile sticks and specimens for SCM observations were obtained from the luted teeth. Bond strength data from enamel and dentin (MPa) were analyzed with separate two-way ANOVAs in order to assess the effect of cement type, luting pressure, and their interactions. Tukey's test was used for post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05), Results: The bond strengths (MPa) to dentin were: P 20 g/mm2 7.5 ± 3.7, 40 g/mm2 10.9 ± 4.5; RU 20 g/mm2 6.8 ± 2.6, 40 g/mm2 14.5 ± 5.3; M 20 g/mm2 4.1 ± 1.8, 40 g/mm2 5.2 ± 1.6. The bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were: P 20 g/mm2 25.2 ± 9.0, 40 g/mm2 30.7 ± 8.6; RU 20 g/mm2 10.7 ± 4.9, 40 g/mm2 11.1 ± 5; M 20 g/mm2 7.3 ± 3.1, 40 g/mm2 7.9 ± 3.2. Cement type, luting pressure, and the interaction of these two factors had significant influences on dentin bond strength, with RU and P outperforming M. RU and P significantly benefited from the increase in luting pressure. In enamel, the type of cement was a significant factor for adhesion, with P yielding the highest and M the lowest strength. The measured bond strengths corresponded with the morphological results. Conclusion: Interfacial strength and adaptation of self-etching and self-adhesive dual-curing cements are enhanced if a seating force greater than finger pressure is maintained throughout the initial self-curing period.",
keywords = "Interface, Microtensile bond strength, Scanning electron microscope, Seating force, Self-adhesive resin cement, Self-etching resin cement",
author = "Cecilia Goracci and Cury, {Alvaro H.} and Amerigo Cantoro and Federica Papacchini and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng} and Marco Ferrari",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "327--335",
journal = "The journal of adhesive dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces

AU - Goracci, Cecilia

AU - Cury, Alvaro H.

AU - Cantoro, Amerigo

AU - Papacchini, Federica

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

AU - Ferrari, Marco

PY - 2006/11/2

Y1 - 2006/11/2

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate strength and morphology of the interface created on enamel and dentin by Panavia F 2.0 (P, Kuraray), RelyX Unicem (RU, 3M ESPE), and Maxeem (M, Sybron-Kerr), applied under two standardized clinically realistic seating pressures. Materials and Methods: Composite overlays (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) were luted on flat enamel or dentin surfaces of 48 extracted molars. During the initial 5-min self-curing period, a pressure of either 20 or 40 g/mm2 was maintained on the overlay. Curing was completed by light irradiation from the top of the overlay for 20 s. Microtensile sticks and specimens for SCM observations were obtained from the luted teeth. Bond strength data from enamel and dentin (MPa) were analyzed with separate two-way ANOVAs in order to assess the effect of cement type, luting pressure, and their interactions. Tukey's test was used for post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05), Results: The bond strengths (MPa) to dentin were: P 20 g/mm2 7.5 ± 3.7, 40 g/mm2 10.9 ± 4.5; RU 20 g/mm2 6.8 ± 2.6, 40 g/mm2 14.5 ± 5.3; M 20 g/mm2 4.1 ± 1.8, 40 g/mm2 5.2 ± 1.6. The bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were: P 20 g/mm2 25.2 ± 9.0, 40 g/mm2 30.7 ± 8.6; RU 20 g/mm2 10.7 ± 4.9, 40 g/mm2 11.1 ± 5; M 20 g/mm2 7.3 ± 3.1, 40 g/mm2 7.9 ± 3.2. Cement type, luting pressure, and the interaction of these two factors had significant influences on dentin bond strength, with RU and P outperforming M. RU and P significantly benefited from the increase in luting pressure. In enamel, the type of cement was a significant factor for adhesion, with P yielding the highest and M the lowest strength. The measured bond strengths corresponded with the morphological results. Conclusion: Interfacial strength and adaptation of self-etching and self-adhesive dual-curing cements are enhanced if a seating force greater than finger pressure is maintained throughout the initial self-curing period.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate strength and morphology of the interface created on enamel and dentin by Panavia F 2.0 (P, Kuraray), RelyX Unicem (RU, 3M ESPE), and Maxeem (M, Sybron-Kerr), applied under two standardized clinically realistic seating pressures. Materials and Methods: Composite overlays (Paradigm MZ100, 3M ESPE) were luted on flat enamel or dentin surfaces of 48 extracted molars. During the initial 5-min self-curing period, a pressure of either 20 or 40 g/mm2 was maintained on the overlay. Curing was completed by light irradiation from the top of the overlay for 20 s. Microtensile sticks and specimens for SCM observations were obtained from the luted teeth. Bond strength data from enamel and dentin (MPa) were analyzed with separate two-way ANOVAs in order to assess the effect of cement type, luting pressure, and their interactions. Tukey's test was used for post-hoc comparisons (α = 0.05), Results: The bond strengths (MPa) to dentin were: P 20 g/mm2 7.5 ± 3.7, 40 g/mm2 10.9 ± 4.5; RU 20 g/mm2 6.8 ± 2.6, 40 g/mm2 14.5 ± 5.3; M 20 g/mm2 4.1 ± 1.8, 40 g/mm2 5.2 ± 1.6. The bond strengths (MPa) to enamel were: P 20 g/mm2 25.2 ± 9.0, 40 g/mm2 30.7 ± 8.6; RU 20 g/mm2 10.7 ± 4.9, 40 g/mm2 11.1 ± 5; M 20 g/mm2 7.3 ± 3.1, 40 g/mm2 7.9 ± 3.2. Cement type, luting pressure, and the interaction of these two factors had significant influences on dentin bond strength, with RU and P outperforming M. RU and P significantly benefited from the increase in luting pressure. In enamel, the type of cement was a significant factor for adhesion, with P yielding the highest and M the lowest strength. The measured bond strengths corresponded with the morphological results. Conclusion: Interfacial strength and adaptation of self-etching and self-adhesive dual-curing cements are enhanced if a seating force greater than finger pressure is maintained throughout the initial self-curing period.

KW - Interface

KW - Microtensile bond strength

KW - Scanning electron microscope

KW - Seating force

KW - Self-adhesive resin cement

KW - Self-etching resin cement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750387981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750387981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 327

EP - 335

JO - The journal of adhesive dentistry

JF - The journal of adhesive dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 5

ER -