Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins

Effect of a hydrophobic layer

W. W. Brackett, S. Ito, F. R. Tay, L. D. Haisch, D. H. Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, the microtensile bond strength of resin composites to dentin was determined when hydrophilic self-etching resins were used with and without an additional layer of a more hydrophobic adhesive. Included were three single-step self-etching adhesives, Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE), iBond GI (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), and as a negative control, UniFil Bond (GC America), a self-etching primer with a separate adhesive. Each product was evaluated using a hybrid resin composite from its respective manufacturer, and each was used as directed and then used with an added layer of a more Hydrophobic resin from its respective manufacturer. Testing was performed after 72 hours using a "non-trimming" microtensile test at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. When the products were used according to manufacturers' directions, iBond had a significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the other three products (p<0.001), which were not significantly different from each other. For the three self-etching adhesive systems, the addition of a layer of a more hydrophobic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths to dentin (p<0.001), while no significant effect was found for the self-etching primer (p=0.40). A significant interaction was found between the variables product and adhesive treatment. The TEM evaluation of Prompt L-Pop and iBond demonstrated reduced nanoleakage with the additional resin layer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)733-738
Number of pages6
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005

Fingerprint

Dentin
Adhesives
Composite Resins
iBond
Prompt L-Pop

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins : Effect of a hydrophobic layer. / Brackett, W. W.; Ito, S.; Tay, F. R.; Haisch, L. D.; Pashley, D. H.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 30, No. 6, 01.11.2005, p. 733-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d200338c16c48319a5d0612dbd9db66,
title = "Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins: Effect of a hydrophobic layer",
abstract = "In this study, the microtensile bond strength of resin composites to dentin was determined when hydrophilic self-etching resins were used with and without an additional layer of a more hydrophobic adhesive. Included were three single-step self-etching adhesives, Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE), iBond GI (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), and as a negative control, UniFil Bond (GC America), a self-etching primer with a separate adhesive. Each product was evaluated using a hybrid resin composite from its respective manufacturer, and each was used as directed and then used with an added layer of a more Hydrophobic resin from its respective manufacturer. Testing was performed after 72 hours using a {"}non-trimming{"} microtensile test at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. When the products were used according to manufacturers' directions, iBond had a significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the other three products (p<0.001), which were not significantly different from each other. For the three self-etching adhesive systems, the addition of a layer of a more hydrophobic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths to dentin (p<0.001), while no significant effect was found for the self-etching primer (p=0.40). A significant interaction was found between the variables product and adhesive treatment. The TEM evaluation of Prompt L-Pop and iBond demonstrated reduced nanoleakage with the additional resin layer.",
author = "Brackett, {W. W.} and S. Ito and Tay, {F. R.} and Haisch, {L. D.} and Pashley, {D. H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/04-152",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "733--738",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins

T2 - Effect of a hydrophobic layer

AU - Brackett, W. W.

AU - Ito, S.

AU - Tay, F. R.

AU - Haisch, L. D.

AU - Pashley, D. H.

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - In this study, the microtensile bond strength of resin composites to dentin was determined when hydrophilic self-etching resins were used with and without an additional layer of a more hydrophobic adhesive. Included were three single-step self-etching adhesives, Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE), iBond GI (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), and as a negative control, UniFil Bond (GC America), a self-etching primer with a separate adhesive. Each product was evaluated using a hybrid resin composite from its respective manufacturer, and each was used as directed and then used with an added layer of a more Hydrophobic resin from its respective manufacturer. Testing was performed after 72 hours using a "non-trimming" microtensile test at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. When the products were used according to manufacturers' directions, iBond had a significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the other three products (p<0.001), which were not significantly different from each other. For the three self-etching adhesive systems, the addition of a layer of a more hydrophobic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths to dentin (p<0.001), while no significant effect was found for the self-etching primer (p=0.40). A significant interaction was found between the variables product and adhesive treatment. The TEM evaluation of Prompt L-Pop and iBond demonstrated reduced nanoleakage with the additional resin layer.

AB - In this study, the microtensile bond strength of resin composites to dentin was determined when hydrophilic self-etching resins were used with and without an additional layer of a more hydrophobic adhesive. Included were three single-step self-etching adhesives, Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE), iBond GI (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc) and Xeno III (Caulk/Dentsply), and as a negative control, UniFil Bond (GC America), a self-etching primer with a separate adhesive. Each product was evaluated using a hybrid resin composite from its respective manufacturer, and each was used as directed and then used with an added layer of a more Hydrophobic resin from its respective manufacturer. Testing was performed after 72 hours using a "non-trimming" microtensile test at a crosshead speed of 0.6 mm/minute. When the products were used according to manufacturers' directions, iBond had a significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the other three products (p<0.001), which were not significantly different from each other. For the three self-etching adhesive systems, the addition of a layer of a more hydrophobic resin produced significantly higher bond strengths to dentin (p<0.001), while no significant effect was found for the self-etching primer (p=0.40). A significant interaction was found between the variables product and adhesive treatment. The TEM evaluation of Prompt L-Pop and iBond demonstrated reduced nanoleakage with the additional resin layer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28444435436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28444435436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/04-152

DO - 10.2341/04-152

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 733

EP - 738

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 6

ER -