Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: A cost-effective analysis

J. Kenneth Byrd, Shaun A. Nguyen, Amy Ketcham, Joshua Hornig, M. Boyd Gillespie, Eric Lentsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To compare the cost of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) with conventional thyroidectomy. Study Design A cost-effectiveness study and chart review. Setting Academic university hospital. Subjects and Methods Pediatric and adult patients referred to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery for suspicious thyroid nodules, goiters, or known carcinomas. A tertiary care hospital's billing department was queried for all hemithyroidectomies and total thyroidectomies completed by the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery between January 5, 2006, and November 1, 2007. The charges, including surgery, hospital, pathology, and anesthesia, for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and traditional or minimally invasive open thyroidectomies meeting MIVAT inclusion criteria were then reviewed retrospectively and compared statistically. Results A total of 185 thyroidectomies were performed, 50.3 percent of which met criteria for MIVAT. Length of stay (days) was significantly shorter for patients undergoing MIVAT hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -0.8; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.08 to -0.52) and not significantly different between groups for total thyroidectomy (mean difference 0.1; 95% CI -0.36 to 0.56). Mean anesthesia cost (U.S.$) was similar between groups for hemi- and total thyroidectomies. MIVAT mean pathology cost was significantly less than open thyroidectomy for hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -89.9; 95% CI -179.01 to -0.79) and approached significance for total thyroidectomy. There was no significant difference in hospital cost and total cost for hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy. Conclusion In a group of matched cohorts, the cost of MIVAT appears to be equal to that of open thyroidectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)789-794
Number of pages6
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume143
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

Thyroidectomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Otolaryngology
Confidence Intervals
Neck
Anesthesia
Head
Pathology
Thyroid Nodule
Hospital Costs
Hospital Departments
Goiter
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy : A cost-effective analysis. / Byrd, J. Kenneth; Nguyen, Shaun A.; Ketcham, Amy; Hornig, Joshua; Gillespie, M. Boyd; Lentsch, Eric.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 143, No. 6, 01.12.2010, p. 789-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Byrd, J. Kenneth ; Nguyen, Shaun A. ; Ketcham, Amy ; Hornig, Joshua ; Gillespie, M. Boyd ; Lentsch, Eric. / Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy : A cost-effective analysis. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2010 ; Vol. 143, No. 6. pp. 789-794.
@article{69132734f498435889a74141a20e1986,
title = "Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: A cost-effective analysis",
abstract = "Objective To compare the cost of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) with conventional thyroidectomy. Study Design A cost-effectiveness study and chart review. Setting Academic university hospital. Subjects and Methods Pediatric and adult patients referred to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery for suspicious thyroid nodules, goiters, or known carcinomas. A tertiary care hospital's billing department was queried for all hemithyroidectomies and total thyroidectomies completed by the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery between January 5, 2006, and November 1, 2007. The charges, including surgery, hospital, pathology, and anesthesia, for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and traditional or minimally invasive open thyroidectomies meeting MIVAT inclusion criteria were then reviewed retrospectively and compared statistically. Results A total of 185 thyroidectomies were performed, 50.3 percent of which met criteria for MIVAT. Length of stay (days) was significantly shorter for patients undergoing MIVAT hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -0.8; 95{\%} confidence interval [95{\%} CI] -1.08 to -0.52) and not significantly different between groups for total thyroidectomy (mean difference 0.1; 95{\%} CI -0.36 to 0.56). Mean anesthesia cost (U.S.$) was similar between groups for hemi- and total thyroidectomies. MIVAT mean pathology cost was significantly less than open thyroidectomy for hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -89.9; 95{\%} CI -179.01 to -0.79) and approached significance for total thyroidectomy. There was no significant difference in hospital cost and total cost for hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy. Conclusion In a group of matched cohorts, the cost of MIVAT appears to be equal to that of open thyroidectomy.",
author = "Byrd, {J. Kenneth} and Nguyen, {Shaun A.} and Amy Ketcham and Joshua Hornig and Gillespie, {M. Boyd} and Eric Lentsch",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.otohns.2010.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "789--794",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy

T2 - A cost-effective analysis

AU - Byrd, J. Kenneth

AU - Nguyen, Shaun A.

AU - Ketcham, Amy

AU - Hornig, Joshua

AU - Gillespie, M. Boyd

AU - Lentsch, Eric

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Objective To compare the cost of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) with conventional thyroidectomy. Study Design A cost-effectiveness study and chart review. Setting Academic university hospital. Subjects and Methods Pediatric and adult patients referred to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery for suspicious thyroid nodules, goiters, or known carcinomas. A tertiary care hospital's billing department was queried for all hemithyroidectomies and total thyroidectomies completed by the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery between January 5, 2006, and November 1, 2007. The charges, including surgery, hospital, pathology, and anesthesia, for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and traditional or minimally invasive open thyroidectomies meeting MIVAT inclusion criteria were then reviewed retrospectively and compared statistically. Results A total of 185 thyroidectomies were performed, 50.3 percent of which met criteria for MIVAT. Length of stay (days) was significantly shorter for patients undergoing MIVAT hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -0.8; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.08 to -0.52) and not significantly different between groups for total thyroidectomy (mean difference 0.1; 95% CI -0.36 to 0.56). Mean anesthesia cost (U.S.$) was similar between groups for hemi- and total thyroidectomies. MIVAT mean pathology cost was significantly less than open thyroidectomy for hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -89.9; 95% CI -179.01 to -0.79) and approached significance for total thyroidectomy. There was no significant difference in hospital cost and total cost for hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy. Conclusion In a group of matched cohorts, the cost of MIVAT appears to be equal to that of open thyroidectomy.

AB - Objective To compare the cost of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) with conventional thyroidectomy. Study Design A cost-effectiveness study and chart review. Setting Academic university hospital. Subjects and Methods Pediatric and adult patients referred to the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery for suspicious thyroid nodules, goiters, or known carcinomas. A tertiary care hospital's billing department was queried for all hemithyroidectomies and total thyroidectomies completed by the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery between January 5, 2006, and November 1, 2007. The charges, including surgery, hospital, pathology, and anesthesia, for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and traditional or minimally invasive open thyroidectomies meeting MIVAT inclusion criteria were then reviewed retrospectively and compared statistically. Results A total of 185 thyroidectomies were performed, 50.3 percent of which met criteria for MIVAT. Length of stay (days) was significantly shorter for patients undergoing MIVAT hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -0.8; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.08 to -0.52) and not significantly different between groups for total thyroidectomy (mean difference 0.1; 95% CI -0.36 to 0.56). Mean anesthesia cost (U.S.$) was similar between groups for hemi- and total thyroidectomies. MIVAT mean pathology cost was significantly less than open thyroidectomy for hemithyroidectomy (mean difference -89.9; 95% CI -179.01 to -0.79) and approached significance for total thyroidectomy. There was no significant difference in hospital cost and total cost for hemithyroidectomy and total thyroidectomy. Conclusion In a group of matched cohorts, the cost of MIVAT appears to be equal to that of open thyroidectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649507347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649507347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.08.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 21109079

AN - SCOPUS:78649507347

VL - 143

SP - 789

EP - 794

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 6

ER -