MO‐D‐303A‐01

Improving MRI Physics for Radiology Residents: Year One

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Educational concepts in various presentations by Perry Sprawls and in the AAPM 2008 Workshop (“Becoming A Better Teacher Of Medical Physics”) suggested that our MRI physics course was geared to the lowest levels of learning, according to Bloom's Taxonomy. We elected to increase the number of higher‐level learning activities in the course in an effort to improve understanding and increase retention. The Problem: Our traditional course was comprised mainly of PowerPoint lectures. One two‐hour lab was held in the evening. Most course time was spent at the “remembering” level, with higher level learning limited to a few questions in class, the lab and an exam. Residents did little outside of class. Engaging the residents in dialog was difficult. The physical layout of the classroom stifled discussion. The mindset of residents was to gather essential MRI facts to memorize before the fall radiology physics exam. Our Solution: We revamped the course to incorporate more higher‐level learning activities. A typical class included: a) out‐of‐class assignments b) a quiz based on the assignments to stimulate thought c) a relevant “artifact of the day” to provoke group discussion d) and demonstrations and discussions using a variety of media. Class was moved to a room inside an MRI suite for access to MRI hardware/software and to give the residents exposure to the MRI environment. Class met around a small table to facilitate discussion. We expanded to four lab sessions. Clinical relevance of MRI physics topics was stressed. Evaluation: We believe our classroom activities and labs inspired more higher‐level thinking, engaging residents to “figure out” (apply, analyze, and evaluate) solutions to clinically relevant problems. A survey of the resident's evaluation of the course will be presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2695
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Physics
Radiology
Learning
Artifacts
Software
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MO‐D‐303A‐01 : Improving MRI Physics for Radiology Residents: Year One. / Allison, Jerry David; Yanasak, Nathan Eugene.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2009, p. 2695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c0f4b05a32f4d5fa019fb3ccb57fa07,
title = "MO‐D‐303A‐01: Improving MRI Physics for Radiology Residents: Year One",
abstract = "Introduction: Educational concepts in various presentations by Perry Sprawls and in the AAPM 2008 Workshop (“Becoming A Better Teacher Of Medical Physics”) suggested that our MRI physics course was geared to the lowest levels of learning, according to Bloom's Taxonomy. We elected to increase the number of higher‐level learning activities in the course in an effort to improve understanding and increase retention. The Problem: Our traditional course was comprised mainly of PowerPoint lectures. One two‐hour lab was held in the evening. Most course time was spent at the “remembering” level, with higher level learning limited to a few questions in class, the lab and an exam. Residents did little outside of class. Engaging the residents in dialog was difficult. The physical layout of the classroom stifled discussion. The mindset of residents was to gather essential MRI facts to memorize before the fall radiology physics exam. Our Solution: We revamped the course to incorporate more higher‐level learning activities. A typical class included: a) out‐of‐class assignments b) a quiz based on the assignments to stimulate thought c) a relevant “artifact of the day” to provoke group discussion d) and demonstrations and discussions using a variety of media. Class was moved to a room inside an MRI suite for access to MRI hardware/software and to give the residents exposure to the MRI environment. Class met around a small table to facilitate discussion. We expanded to four lab sessions. Clinical relevance of MRI physics topics was stressed. Evaluation: We believe our classroom activities and labs inspired more higher‐level thinking, engaging residents to “figure out” (apply, analyze, and evaluate) solutions to clinically relevant problems. A survey of the resident's evaluation of the course will be presented.",
author = "Allison, {Jerry David} and Yanasak, {Nathan Eugene}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182224",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2695",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MO‐D‐303A‐01

T2 - Improving MRI Physics for Radiology Residents: Year One

AU - Allison, Jerry David

AU - Yanasak, Nathan Eugene

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Introduction: Educational concepts in various presentations by Perry Sprawls and in the AAPM 2008 Workshop (“Becoming A Better Teacher Of Medical Physics”) suggested that our MRI physics course was geared to the lowest levels of learning, according to Bloom's Taxonomy. We elected to increase the number of higher‐level learning activities in the course in an effort to improve understanding and increase retention. The Problem: Our traditional course was comprised mainly of PowerPoint lectures. One two‐hour lab was held in the evening. Most course time was spent at the “remembering” level, with higher level learning limited to a few questions in class, the lab and an exam. Residents did little outside of class. Engaging the residents in dialog was difficult. The physical layout of the classroom stifled discussion. The mindset of residents was to gather essential MRI facts to memorize before the fall radiology physics exam. Our Solution: We revamped the course to incorporate more higher‐level learning activities. A typical class included: a) out‐of‐class assignments b) a quiz based on the assignments to stimulate thought c) a relevant “artifact of the day” to provoke group discussion d) and demonstrations and discussions using a variety of media. Class was moved to a room inside an MRI suite for access to MRI hardware/software and to give the residents exposure to the MRI environment. Class met around a small table to facilitate discussion. We expanded to four lab sessions. Clinical relevance of MRI physics topics was stressed. Evaluation: We believe our classroom activities and labs inspired more higher‐level thinking, engaging residents to “figure out” (apply, analyze, and evaluate) solutions to clinically relevant problems. A survey of the resident's evaluation of the course will be presented.

AB - Introduction: Educational concepts in various presentations by Perry Sprawls and in the AAPM 2008 Workshop (“Becoming A Better Teacher Of Medical Physics”) suggested that our MRI physics course was geared to the lowest levels of learning, according to Bloom's Taxonomy. We elected to increase the number of higher‐level learning activities in the course in an effort to improve understanding and increase retention. The Problem: Our traditional course was comprised mainly of PowerPoint lectures. One two‐hour lab was held in the evening. Most course time was spent at the “remembering” level, with higher level learning limited to a few questions in class, the lab and an exam. Residents did little outside of class. Engaging the residents in dialog was difficult. The physical layout of the classroom stifled discussion. The mindset of residents was to gather essential MRI facts to memorize before the fall radiology physics exam. Our Solution: We revamped the course to incorporate more higher‐level learning activities. A typical class included: a) out‐of‐class assignments b) a quiz based on the assignments to stimulate thought c) a relevant “artifact of the day” to provoke group discussion d) and demonstrations and discussions using a variety of media. Class was moved to a room inside an MRI suite for access to MRI hardware/software and to give the residents exposure to the MRI environment. Class met around a small table to facilitate discussion. We expanded to four lab sessions. Clinical relevance of MRI physics topics was stressed. Evaluation: We believe our classroom activities and labs inspired more higher‐level thinking, engaging residents to “figure out” (apply, analyze, and evaluate) solutions to clinically relevant problems. A survey of the resident's evaluation of the course will be presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024818251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024818251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182224

DO - 10.1118/1.3182224

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 2695

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -