Morphometric assessment of dissection fields with robotic thyroidectomy approaches: Pre-clinical investigation

Michael C. Singer, Melanie W. Seybt, David J. Terris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant pre-clinical data. We sought to define differences in the extent of dissection associated with 2 different robotic thyroidectomy techniques using morphometric measurements of the area of dissection required for each approach. Design: Morphometric analysis of human cadavers. Methods: Seven fresh human cadavers were obtained for surface anatomical study. Using previously defined landmarks, the area necessary to accomplish robotic thyroidectomy using either the transaxillary or facelift approach was marked in a standardized fashion for these procedures and then photographed. ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) was used to calibrate the photographs and measure the surface area of the region requiring dissection in each approach. Results: A total of 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets were simulated (14 for each of the 2 surgical approaches) with each specimen serving as its own control. The mean area of dissection required for RFT was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 (range 25.2 to 47.9 cm2). For RAT, the area was 38.3% greater on average (p<0.0001): the mean was 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 (range 52.3 to 83.6 cm2). Conclusions: There are few objective data governing the recent adoption of technology-intense robotic thyroidectomy procedures. We have quantified the difference in dissection required when accomplishing two different robotic approaches. These measurable differences may help to define advantages when comparing available surgical techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S294
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume121
Issue numberSUPPL. 5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 29 2011

Fingerprint

Thyroidectomy
Robotics
Dissection
Cadaver
Rhytidoplasty
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Software
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Morphometric assessment of dissection fields with robotic thyroidectomy approaches : Pre-clinical investigation. / Singer, Michael C.; Seybt, Melanie W.; Terris, David J.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 121, No. SUPPL. 5, 29.08.2011, p. S294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2246aa9538df4b1cbb5ff47bde6a4423,
title = "Morphometric assessment of dissection fields with robotic thyroidectomy approaches: Pre-clinical investigation",
abstract = "Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant pre-clinical data. We sought to define differences in the extent of dissection associated with 2 different robotic thyroidectomy techniques using morphometric measurements of the area of dissection required for each approach. Design: Morphometric analysis of human cadavers. Methods: Seven fresh human cadavers were obtained for surface anatomical study. Using previously defined landmarks, the area necessary to accomplish robotic thyroidectomy using either the transaxillary or facelift approach was marked in a standardized fashion for these procedures and then photographed. ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) was used to calibrate the photographs and measure the surface area of the region requiring dissection in each approach. Results: A total of 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets were simulated (14 for each of the 2 surgical approaches) with each specimen serving as its own control. The mean area of dissection required for RFT was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 (range 25.2 to 47.9 cm2). For RAT, the area was 38.3{\%} greater on average (p<0.0001): the mean was 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 (range 52.3 to 83.6 cm2). Conclusions: There are few objective data governing the recent adoption of technology-intense robotic thyroidectomy procedures. We have quantified the difference in dissection required when accomplishing two different robotic approaches. These measurable differences may help to define advantages when comparing available surgical techniques.",
author = "Singer, {Michael C.} and Seybt, {Melanie W.} and Terris, {David J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1002/lary.22250",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "S294",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL. 5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Morphometric assessment of dissection fields with robotic thyroidectomy approaches

T2 - Pre-clinical investigation

AU - Singer, Michael C.

AU - Seybt, Melanie W.

AU - Terris, David J.

PY - 2011/8/29

Y1 - 2011/8/29

N2 - Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant pre-clinical data. We sought to define differences in the extent of dissection associated with 2 different robotic thyroidectomy techniques using morphometric measurements of the area of dissection required for each approach. Design: Morphometric analysis of human cadavers. Methods: Seven fresh human cadavers were obtained for surface anatomical study. Using previously defined landmarks, the area necessary to accomplish robotic thyroidectomy using either the transaxillary or facelift approach was marked in a standardized fashion for these procedures and then photographed. ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) was used to calibrate the photographs and measure the surface area of the region requiring dissection in each approach. Results: A total of 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets were simulated (14 for each of the 2 surgical approaches) with each specimen serving as its own control. The mean area of dissection required for RFT was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 (range 25.2 to 47.9 cm2). For RAT, the area was 38.3% greater on average (p<0.0001): the mean was 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 (range 52.3 to 83.6 cm2). Conclusions: There are few objective data governing the recent adoption of technology-intense robotic thyroidectomy procedures. We have quantified the difference in dissection required when accomplishing two different robotic approaches. These measurable differences may help to define advantages when comparing available surgical techniques.

AB - Objectives: Robotic thyroidectomy was introduced in the United States despite scant pre-clinical data. We sought to define differences in the extent of dissection associated with 2 different robotic thyroidectomy techniques using morphometric measurements of the area of dissection required for each approach. Design: Morphometric analysis of human cadavers. Methods: Seven fresh human cadavers were obtained for surface anatomical study. Using previously defined landmarks, the area necessary to accomplish robotic thyroidectomy using either the transaxillary or facelift approach was marked in a standardized fashion for these procedures and then photographed. ImageJ software (National Institute of Health) was used to calibrate the photographs and measure the surface area of the region requiring dissection in each approach. Results: A total of 28 robotic thyroidectomy dissection pockets were simulated (14 for each of the 2 surgical approaches) with each specimen serving as its own control. The mean area of dissection required for RFT was 39.2 ± 6.6 cm2 (range 25.2 to 47.9 cm2). For RAT, the area was 38.3% greater on average (p<0.0001): the mean was 63.5 ± 9.6 cm2 (range 52.3 to 83.6 cm2). Conclusions: There are few objective data governing the recent adoption of technology-intense robotic thyroidectomy procedures. We have quantified the difference in dissection required when accomplishing two different robotic approaches. These measurable differences may help to define advantages when comparing available surgical techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052008583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052008583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.22250

DO - 10.1002/lary.22250

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80052008583

VL - 121

SP - S294

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - SUPPL. 5

ER -