Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships

Annamarie Connolly, Katrina Davis, Petra Casey, Lisa Keder, Archana Pradhan, Renee T Page, Marilyn Raymond, John Dalrymple

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92%) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72%. Five of six schools achieved ≥70% completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0% to 97.8% with four of six schools reporting ≥65% feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26%). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93%), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93%), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76%/74%). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)716-720
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

gynecology
obstetrics
CAT
experience
student
electronics
school
documentation
resident
questionnaire
medical student
university teacher

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships. / Connolly, Annamarie; Davis, Katrina; Casey, Petra; Keder, Lisa; Pradhan, Archana; Page, Renee T; Raymond, Marilyn; Dalrymple, John.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 4, 01.01.2010, p. 716-720.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connolly, Annamarie ; Davis, Katrina ; Casey, Petra ; Keder, Lisa ; Pradhan, Archana ; Page, Renee T ; Raymond, Marilyn ; Dalrymple, John. / Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships. In: Academic Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 4. pp. 716-720.
@article{56e82e6e98ab4be4a8ebdbb4d354e3d9,
title = "Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92{\%}) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72{\%}. Five of six schools achieved ≥70{\%} completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0{\%} to 97.8{\%} with four of six schools reporting ≥65{\%} feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26{\%}). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93{\%}), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93{\%}), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76{\%}/74{\%}). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.",
author = "Annamarie Connolly and Katrina Davis and Petra Casey and Lisa Keder and Archana Pradhan and Page, {Renee T} and Marilyn Raymond and John Dalrymple",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2a535",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "716--720",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicenter trial of the clinical activities tool to document the comparability of clinical experiences in obstetrics-gynecology clerkships

AU - Connolly, Annamarie

AU - Davis, Katrina

AU - Casey, Petra

AU - Keder, Lisa

AU - Pradhan, Archana

AU - Page, Renee T

AU - Raymond, Marilyn

AU - Dalrymple, John

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92%) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72%. Five of six schools achieved ≥70% completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0% to 97.8% with four of six schools reporting ≥65% feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26%). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93%), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93%), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76%/74%). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.

AB - Purpose: To assess the implementation of the Clinical Activities Tool (CAT) for facilitating Liaison Committee on Medical Education-required documentation of the comparability of obstetrics-gynecology (ob/gyn) clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback at multiple sites during one academic year. Method: Ob/gyn clerkship students at six U.S. medical schools were given CATs to guide and document clinical experiences from June 2006 to June 2007. Students used a paper CAT at five institutions and an electronic version at one. CATs listed procedures, skills, and topics recommended by the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and included a midclerkship feedback section. Resident/faculty signatures documented completion of items for paper CATs. Electronic CAT item completion was self-documented by students. Students completed a questionnaire on CAT use. Results: At the six schools, 876 medical students rotated on ob/gyn clerkships; 808 (92%) submitted CATs. Mean item completion rate was 72%. Five of six schools achieved ≥70% completion rates. Midclerkship feedback signature rates ranged from 0% to 97.8% with four of six schools reporting ≥65% feedback. Comparability of clinical experiences and midclerkship feedback was successfully documented across sites for each institution (number of sites: range = 1-9; median = 5). Questionnaires on CAT use were submitted by 231 students (26%). Students using paper CATs reported that doing so clarified course objectives (93%), provided clerkship guidance/structure (93%), and facilitated interaction with faculty/residents (76%/74%). Students rated the electronic CAT significantly less favorably. Conclusions: CAT implementation at multiple institutions for documentation of student clinical experience comparability and midclerkship feedback was successful. Students evaluated the paper CAT positively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951674905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951674905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2a535

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d2a535

M3 - Article

C2 - 20354394

AN - SCOPUS:77951674905

VL - 85

SP - 716

EP - 720

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -