Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement.

E. A. Balas, D. Gardner, O. Hamdy, Z. R. Li, J. A. Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to measure the loss of information in communication between clinical researchers and information system developers, to design a tool for sharing clinical practice guidelines, and to test the feasibility of this tool in knowledge base development. The analysis of a sample of 101 randomized controlled clinical trials indicated that exact numeric results were published in only 64 percent of the trials. While structured abstracts were associated with improved total quality scores (p0.001), there was no significant improvement in reporting numeric results (p=0.31). Based on the documented loss of information and the needs of various parties involved, the concept of a multipurpose knowledge module was developed for sharing clinical practice recommendations. Such clinical practice guideline modules were applied in developing the knowledge base of a quality feedback expert system (QFES).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1004
Number of pages4
JournalMedinfo. MEDINFO
Volume8 Pt 2
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Knowledge Bases
Decision Support Techniques
Quality Improvement
Practice Guidelines
Expert Systems
Information Systems
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Balas, E. A., Gardner, D., Hamdy, O., Li, Z. R., & Mitchell, J. A. (1995). Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement. Medinfo. MEDINFO, 8 Pt 2, 1001-1004.

Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement. / Balas, E. A.; Gardner, D.; Hamdy, O.; Li, Z. R.; Mitchell, J. A.

In: Medinfo. MEDINFO, Vol. 8 Pt 2, 1995, p. 1001-1004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Balas, EA, Gardner, D, Hamdy, O, Li, ZR & Mitchell, JA 1995, 'Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement.', Medinfo. MEDINFO, vol. 8 Pt 2, pp. 1001-1004.
Balas, E. A. ; Gardner, D. ; Hamdy, O. ; Li, Z. R. ; Mitchell, J. A. / Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement. In: Medinfo. MEDINFO. 1995 ; Vol. 8 Pt 2. pp. 1001-1004.
@article{5cc2260aa449406ab2db64df930f0615,
title = "Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement.",
abstract = "This study aimed to measure the loss of information in communication between clinical researchers and information system developers, to design a tool for sharing clinical practice guidelines, and to test the feasibility of this tool in knowledge base development. The analysis of a sample of 101 randomized controlled clinical trials indicated that exact numeric results were published in only 64 percent of the trials. While structured abstracts were associated with improved total quality scores (p0.001), there was no significant improvement in reporting numeric results (p=0.31). Based on the documented loss of information and the needs of various parties involved, the concept of a multipurpose knowledge module was developed for sharing clinical practice recommendations. Such clinical practice guideline modules were applied in developing the knowledge base of a quality feedback expert system (QFES).",
author = "Balas, {E. A.} and D. Gardner and O. Hamdy and Li, {Z. R.} and Mitchell, {J. A.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8 Pt 2",
pages = "1001--1004",
journal = "Medinfo. MEDINFO",
issn = "1569-6332",
publisher = "IOS Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multipurpose practice guideline modules for clinical decision analysis and quality improvement.

AU - Balas, E. A.

AU - Gardner, D.

AU - Hamdy, O.

AU - Li, Z. R.

AU - Mitchell, J. A.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - This study aimed to measure the loss of information in communication between clinical researchers and information system developers, to design a tool for sharing clinical practice guidelines, and to test the feasibility of this tool in knowledge base development. The analysis of a sample of 101 randomized controlled clinical trials indicated that exact numeric results were published in only 64 percent of the trials. While structured abstracts were associated with improved total quality scores (p0.001), there was no significant improvement in reporting numeric results (p=0.31). Based on the documented loss of information and the needs of various parties involved, the concept of a multipurpose knowledge module was developed for sharing clinical practice recommendations. Such clinical practice guideline modules were applied in developing the knowledge base of a quality feedback expert system (QFES).

AB - This study aimed to measure the loss of information in communication between clinical researchers and information system developers, to design a tool for sharing clinical practice guidelines, and to test the feasibility of this tool in knowledge base development. The analysis of a sample of 101 randomized controlled clinical trials indicated that exact numeric results were published in only 64 percent of the trials. While structured abstracts were associated with improved total quality scores (p0.001), there was no significant improvement in reporting numeric results (p=0.31). Based on the documented loss of information and the needs of various parties involved, the concept of a multipurpose knowledge module was developed for sharing clinical practice recommendations. Such clinical practice guideline modules were applied in developing the knowledge base of a quality feedback expert system (QFES).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029447206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029447206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8591350

AN - SCOPUS:0029447206

VL - 8 Pt 2

SP - 1001

EP - 1004

JO - Medinfo. MEDINFO

JF - Medinfo. MEDINFO

SN - 1569-6332

ER -