Nasolaryngoscopy in a family medicine clinic: Indications, findings, and economics

Jeff T Wilkins, Ralph A Gillies, April Getz, Dave Zimmerman, Larry Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal complaints are common among patients who present to primary care. Patients with these complaints are often referred for nasolaryngoscopy evaluation to exclude serious conditions such as laryngeal cancer. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series in which 276 charts of adult outpatients who were referred for nasolaryngoscopy were reviewed. We examined patient demographics, procedure indications and findings, complications, and changes in clinical management. Results: Nasolaryngoscopy was completed in 273 (98.9%) patients (mean age, 51.3 ± 14.6 years; 71.4% were women). The most common indications for nasolaryngoscopy were hoarseness (51.3%), globus sensation (32.0%), and chronic cough (17.1%); the most common findings included laryngopharyngeal reflux (42.5%), chronic rhinitis (32.2%), and vocal cord lesions (13.2%). Three patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer and this diagnosis was significantly associated with a history of smoking (P = .03). No major complications occurred. Conclusions: We found that nasolaryngoscopy was a safe procedure in the primary care setting, and no major complications occurred in our series. Patients who have ever smoked and complain of hoarseness are at higher risk for laryngeal cancer. An alarming 1% of patients in our series were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. This is the first study to define the rates of laryngopharyngeal reflux, vocal cord lesions, and laryngeal cancer among primary care patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-597
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

Laryngeal Neoplasms
Economics
Medicine
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Hoarseness
Primary Health Care
Vocal Cords
Rhinitis
Cough
Outpatients
Smoking
Demography

Keywords

  • Laryngeal neoplasms
  • Laryngopharyngeal reflux
  • Laryngoscopy
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Nasolaryngoscopy in a family medicine clinic : Indications, findings, and economics. / Wilkins, Jeff T; Gillies, Ralph A; Getz, April; Zimmerman, Dave; Kang, Larry.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.09.2010, p. 591-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e50c9c6b87544f27adeee9bc0af2bf97,
title = "Nasolaryngoscopy in a family medicine clinic: Indications, findings, and economics",
abstract = "Background: Nasopharyngeal complaints are common among patients who present to primary care. Patients with these complaints are often referred for nasolaryngoscopy evaluation to exclude serious conditions such as laryngeal cancer. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series in which 276 charts of adult outpatients who were referred for nasolaryngoscopy were reviewed. We examined patient demographics, procedure indications and findings, complications, and changes in clinical management. Results: Nasolaryngoscopy was completed in 273 (98.9{\%}) patients (mean age, 51.3 ± 14.6 years; 71.4{\%} were women). The most common indications for nasolaryngoscopy were hoarseness (51.3{\%}), globus sensation (32.0{\%}), and chronic cough (17.1{\%}); the most common findings included laryngopharyngeal reflux (42.5{\%}), chronic rhinitis (32.2{\%}), and vocal cord lesions (13.2{\%}). Three patients (1.1{\%}) were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer and this diagnosis was significantly associated with a history of smoking (P = .03). No major complications occurred. Conclusions: We found that nasolaryngoscopy was a safe procedure in the primary care setting, and no major complications occurred in our series. Patients who have ever smoked and complain of hoarseness are at higher risk for laryngeal cancer. An alarming 1{\%} of patients in our series were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. This is the first study to define the rates of laryngopharyngeal reflux, vocal cord lesions, and laryngeal cancer among primary care patients.",
keywords = "Laryngeal neoplasms, Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Laryngoscopy, Primary health care",
author = "Wilkins, {Jeff T} and Gillies, {Ralph A} and April Getz and Dave Zimmerman and Larry Kang",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "591--597",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nasolaryngoscopy in a family medicine clinic

T2 - Indications, findings, and economics

AU - Wilkins, Jeff T

AU - Gillies, Ralph A

AU - Getz, April

AU - Zimmerman, Dave

AU - Kang, Larry

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Background: Nasopharyngeal complaints are common among patients who present to primary care. Patients with these complaints are often referred for nasolaryngoscopy evaluation to exclude serious conditions such as laryngeal cancer. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series in which 276 charts of adult outpatients who were referred for nasolaryngoscopy were reviewed. We examined patient demographics, procedure indications and findings, complications, and changes in clinical management. Results: Nasolaryngoscopy was completed in 273 (98.9%) patients (mean age, 51.3 ± 14.6 years; 71.4% were women). The most common indications for nasolaryngoscopy were hoarseness (51.3%), globus sensation (32.0%), and chronic cough (17.1%); the most common findings included laryngopharyngeal reflux (42.5%), chronic rhinitis (32.2%), and vocal cord lesions (13.2%). Three patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer and this diagnosis was significantly associated with a history of smoking (P = .03). No major complications occurred. Conclusions: We found that nasolaryngoscopy was a safe procedure in the primary care setting, and no major complications occurred in our series. Patients who have ever smoked and complain of hoarseness are at higher risk for laryngeal cancer. An alarming 1% of patients in our series were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. This is the first study to define the rates of laryngopharyngeal reflux, vocal cord lesions, and laryngeal cancer among primary care patients.

AB - Background: Nasopharyngeal complaints are common among patients who present to primary care. Patients with these complaints are often referred for nasolaryngoscopy evaluation to exclude serious conditions such as laryngeal cancer. Methods: This study is a retrospective case series in which 276 charts of adult outpatients who were referred for nasolaryngoscopy were reviewed. We examined patient demographics, procedure indications and findings, complications, and changes in clinical management. Results: Nasolaryngoscopy was completed in 273 (98.9%) patients (mean age, 51.3 ± 14.6 years; 71.4% were women). The most common indications for nasolaryngoscopy were hoarseness (51.3%), globus sensation (32.0%), and chronic cough (17.1%); the most common findings included laryngopharyngeal reflux (42.5%), chronic rhinitis (32.2%), and vocal cord lesions (13.2%). Three patients (1.1%) were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer and this diagnosis was significantly associated with a history of smoking (P = .03). No major complications occurred. Conclusions: We found that nasolaryngoscopy was a safe procedure in the primary care setting, and no major complications occurred in our series. Patients who have ever smoked and complain of hoarseness are at higher risk for laryngeal cancer. An alarming 1% of patients in our series were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer. This is the first study to define the rates of laryngopharyngeal reflux, vocal cord lesions, and laryngeal cancer among primary care patients.

KW - Laryngeal neoplasms

KW - Laryngopharyngeal reflux

KW - Laryngoscopy

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956900587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956900587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090186

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2010.05.090186

M3 - Article

C2 - 20823353

AN - SCOPUS:77956900587

VL - 23

SP - 591

EP - 597

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 5

ER -