Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper joins the Native vs. Non-native writer dichotomy discussion of whether native speakers of English enjoy advantage in the academic writing context from the linguistic perspective by analyzing conjunctive realizations of four groups of writers: English L1 and L2 graduate students; English L1 and L2 scholars in applied linguistics. Fifteen essays from each group are compared on their explicit conjunctions and Logical Grammatical Metaphors (LGMs). Both graduate student groups employ explicit conjunctions more than the two scholar groups. For LGMs, not only do both graduate student groups differ from the two scholar groups, they also differ significantly from each other. In contrast, the two scholar groups show similar usage in explicit conjunctions and LGMs. Qualitative differences of conjunctive usage and lexical varieties are also found among the four groups. The study points out that writer experience overweighs their native-speaker status in academic writing. The findings question the native-speaker linguistic advantage to a certain extent and indicate complexity of this issue. As language for academic purposes is strikingly different from spoken language and cognitively more demanding, academic language needs to be learned and developed out of disciplinary studies with targeted instruction for all novice writers, regardless of their native or non-native speaker status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-57
Number of pages11
JournalAmpersand
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

writer
Group
metaphor
graduate
linguistics
Native Speaker
Writer
Academic Writing
student
spoken language
language
Logic
Graduate Students
Grammatical Metaphor
instruction
experience

Keywords

  • Conjunctive realization
  • EAP writing
  • Logical grammatical metaphor
  • Native vs. non-native writer dichotomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers. / Zhao, Jun.

In: Ampersand, Vol. 4, 01.01.2017, p. 47-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84d8393c10494e8b9ffd66edd785e0cd,
title = "Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers",
abstract = "This paper joins the Native vs. Non-native writer dichotomy discussion of whether native speakers of English enjoy advantage in the academic writing context from the linguistic perspective by analyzing conjunctive realizations of four groups of writers: English L1 and L2 graduate students; English L1 and L2 scholars in applied linguistics. Fifteen essays from each group are compared on their explicit conjunctions and Logical Grammatical Metaphors (LGMs). Both graduate student groups employ explicit conjunctions more than the two scholar groups. For LGMs, not only do both graduate student groups differ from the two scholar groups, they also differ significantly from each other. In contrast, the two scholar groups show similar usage in explicit conjunctions and LGMs. Qualitative differences of conjunctive usage and lexical varieties are also found among the four groups. The study points out that writer experience overweighs their native-speaker status in academic writing. The findings question the native-speaker linguistic advantage to a certain extent and indicate complexity of this issue. As language for academic purposes is strikingly different from spoken language and cognitively more demanding, academic language needs to be learned and developed out of disciplinary studies with targeted instruction for all novice writers, regardless of their native or non-native speaker status.",
keywords = "Conjunctive realization, EAP writing, Logical grammatical metaphor, Native vs. non-native writer dichotomy",
author = "Jun Zhao",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "47--57",
journal = "Ampersand",
issn = "2215-0390",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers

AU - Zhao, Jun

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This paper joins the Native vs. Non-native writer dichotomy discussion of whether native speakers of English enjoy advantage in the academic writing context from the linguistic perspective by analyzing conjunctive realizations of four groups of writers: English L1 and L2 graduate students; English L1 and L2 scholars in applied linguistics. Fifteen essays from each group are compared on their explicit conjunctions and Logical Grammatical Metaphors (LGMs). Both graduate student groups employ explicit conjunctions more than the two scholar groups. For LGMs, not only do both graduate student groups differ from the two scholar groups, they also differ significantly from each other. In contrast, the two scholar groups show similar usage in explicit conjunctions and LGMs. Qualitative differences of conjunctive usage and lexical varieties are also found among the four groups. The study points out that writer experience overweighs their native-speaker status in academic writing. The findings question the native-speaker linguistic advantage to a certain extent and indicate complexity of this issue. As language for academic purposes is strikingly different from spoken language and cognitively more demanding, academic language needs to be learned and developed out of disciplinary studies with targeted instruction for all novice writers, regardless of their native or non-native speaker status.

AB - This paper joins the Native vs. Non-native writer dichotomy discussion of whether native speakers of English enjoy advantage in the academic writing context from the linguistic perspective by analyzing conjunctive realizations of four groups of writers: English L1 and L2 graduate students; English L1 and L2 scholars in applied linguistics. Fifteen essays from each group are compared on their explicit conjunctions and Logical Grammatical Metaphors (LGMs). Both graduate student groups employ explicit conjunctions more than the two scholar groups. For LGMs, not only do both graduate student groups differ from the two scholar groups, they also differ significantly from each other. In contrast, the two scholar groups show similar usage in explicit conjunctions and LGMs. Qualitative differences of conjunctive usage and lexical varieties are also found among the four groups. The study points out that writer experience overweighs their native-speaker status in academic writing. The findings question the native-speaker linguistic advantage to a certain extent and indicate complexity of this issue. As language for academic purposes is strikingly different from spoken language and cognitively more demanding, academic language needs to be learned and developed out of disciplinary studies with targeted instruction for all novice writers, regardless of their native or non-native speaker status.

KW - Conjunctive realization

KW - EAP writing

KW - Logical grammatical metaphor

KW - Native vs. non-native writer dichotomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025828045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025828045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 47

EP - 57

JO - Ampersand

JF - Ampersand

SN - 2215-0390

ER -