Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness

David T. Blake, Steven S. Hsiao, Kenneth O. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tactile pattern recognition depends on form and texture perception. A principal dimension of texture perception is roughness, the neural coding of which was the focus of this study. Previous studies have shown that perceived roughness is not based on neural activity in the Pacinian or cutaneous slowly adapting type II (SAII) neural responses or on mean impulse rate or temporal patterning in the cutaneous slowly adapting type I (SAI) or rapidly adapting (RA) discharge evoked by a textured surface. However, those studies found very high correlations between roughness scaling by humans and measures of spatial variation in SAI and RA firing rates. The present study used textured surfaces composed of dots of varying height (280-620 μm) and diameter (0.25- 2.5 mm) in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. RA responses were affected least by the range of dot diameters and heights that produced the widest variation in perceived roughness, and these responses could not account for the psychophysical data. In contrast, spatial variation in SAI impulse rate was correlated closely with perceived roughness over the whole stimulus range, and a single measure of SAI spatial variation accounts for the psychophysical data in this (0.974 correlation) and two previous studies. Analyses based on the possibility that perceived roughness depends on both afferent types suggest that if the RA response plays a role in roughness perception, it is one of mild inhibition. These data reinforce the hypothesis that SAI afferents are mainly responsible for information about form and texture whereas RA afferents are mainly responsible for information about flutter, slip, and motion across the skin surface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7480-7489
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume17
Issue number19
StatePublished - Oct 9 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physiological Pattern Recognition
Mechanoreceptors
Skin
Form Perception

Keywords

  • Mechanoreceptor
  • Neurophysiology
  • P sychophysics
  • Pattern recognition
  • Rhesus
  • Roughness
  • Somatosensory
  • Texture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition : The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. / Blake, David T.; Hsiao, Steven S.; Johnson, Kenneth O.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 17, No. 19, 09.10.1997, p. 7480-7489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{061edc87a7ed458386fea232412b2e1e,
title = "Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness",
abstract = "Tactile pattern recognition depends on form and texture perception. A principal dimension of texture perception is roughness, the neural coding of which was the focus of this study. Previous studies have shown that perceived roughness is not based on neural activity in the Pacinian or cutaneous slowly adapting type II (SAII) neural responses or on mean impulse rate or temporal patterning in the cutaneous slowly adapting type I (SAI) or rapidly adapting (RA) discharge evoked by a textured surface. However, those studies found very high correlations between roughness scaling by humans and measures of spatial variation in SAI and RA firing rates. The present study used textured surfaces composed of dots of varying height (280-620 μm) and diameter (0.25- 2.5 mm) in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. RA responses were affected least by the range of dot diameters and heights that produced the widest variation in perceived roughness, and these responses could not account for the psychophysical data. In contrast, spatial variation in SAI impulse rate was correlated closely with perceived roughness over the whole stimulus range, and a single measure of SAI spatial variation accounts for the psychophysical data in this (0.974 correlation) and two previous studies. Analyses based on the possibility that perceived roughness depends on both afferent types suggest that if the RA response plays a role in roughness perception, it is one of mild inhibition. These data reinforce the hypothesis that SAI afferents are mainly responsible for information about form and texture whereas RA afferents are mainly responsible for information about flutter, slip, and motion across the skin surface.",
keywords = "Mechanoreceptor, Neurophysiology, P sychophysics, Pattern recognition, Rhesus, Roughness, Somatosensory, Texture",
author = "Blake, {David T.} and Hsiao, {Steven S.} and Johnson, {Kenneth O.}",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
day = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "7480--7489",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition

T2 - The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness

AU - Blake, David T.

AU - Hsiao, Steven S.

AU - Johnson, Kenneth O.

PY - 1997/10/9

Y1 - 1997/10/9

N2 - Tactile pattern recognition depends on form and texture perception. A principal dimension of texture perception is roughness, the neural coding of which was the focus of this study. Previous studies have shown that perceived roughness is not based on neural activity in the Pacinian or cutaneous slowly adapting type II (SAII) neural responses or on mean impulse rate or temporal patterning in the cutaneous slowly adapting type I (SAI) or rapidly adapting (RA) discharge evoked by a textured surface. However, those studies found very high correlations between roughness scaling by humans and measures of spatial variation in SAI and RA firing rates. The present study used textured surfaces composed of dots of varying height (280-620 μm) and diameter (0.25- 2.5 mm) in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. RA responses were affected least by the range of dot diameters and heights that produced the widest variation in perceived roughness, and these responses could not account for the psychophysical data. In contrast, spatial variation in SAI impulse rate was correlated closely with perceived roughness over the whole stimulus range, and a single measure of SAI spatial variation accounts for the psychophysical data in this (0.974 correlation) and two previous studies. Analyses based on the possibility that perceived roughness depends on both afferent types suggest that if the RA response plays a role in roughness perception, it is one of mild inhibition. These data reinforce the hypothesis that SAI afferents are mainly responsible for information about form and texture whereas RA afferents are mainly responsible for information about flutter, slip, and motion across the skin surface.

AB - Tactile pattern recognition depends on form and texture perception. A principal dimension of texture perception is roughness, the neural coding of which was the focus of this study. Previous studies have shown that perceived roughness is not based on neural activity in the Pacinian or cutaneous slowly adapting type II (SAII) neural responses or on mean impulse rate or temporal patterning in the cutaneous slowly adapting type I (SAI) or rapidly adapting (RA) discharge evoked by a textured surface. However, those studies found very high correlations between roughness scaling by humans and measures of spatial variation in SAI and RA firing rates. The present study used textured surfaces composed of dots of varying height (280-620 μm) and diameter (0.25- 2.5 mm) in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. RA responses were affected least by the range of dot diameters and heights that produced the widest variation in perceived roughness, and these responses could not account for the psychophysical data. In contrast, spatial variation in SAI impulse rate was correlated closely with perceived roughness over the whole stimulus range, and a single measure of SAI spatial variation accounts for the psychophysical data in this (0.974 correlation) and two previous studies. Analyses based on the possibility that perceived roughness depends on both afferent types suggest that if the RA response plays a role in roughness perception, it is one of mild inhibition. These data reinforce the hypothesis that SAI afferents are mainly responsible for information about form and texture whereas RA afferents are mainly responsible for information about flutter, slip, and motion across the skin surface.

KW - Mechanoreceptor

KW - Neurophysiology

KW - P sychophysics

KW - Pattern recognition

KW - Rhesus

KW - Roughness

KW - Somatosensory

KW - Texture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030863893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030863893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9295394

AN - SCOPUS:0030863893

VL - 17

SP - 7480

EP - 7489

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 19

ER -