New ethics guidelines for epidemiology

Background and rationale

Douglas L. Weed, Steven Scott Coughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past decade, at least four sets of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists have been prepared by various national and international organizations. None, however, have been officially adopted by the American College of Epidemiology (ACE). Recently, the ACE asked its Ethics and Standards of Practice (ESOP) Committee to produce ethics guidelines. In this paper, we explain the context and rationale for this effort, describe the purpose and content of ethics guidelines in epidemiology, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Three issues that are central to the mission of ACE-education, policy, and advocacy-are inadequately addressed in existing ethics guidelines. In addition, ethics guidelines are not static documents; they should reflect the changing role of epidemiologists in society, including issues arising in emerging subspecialty areas. New, more dynamic, guidelines that emphasize core values, obligations, and virtues, may help to further define and legitimize the profession of epidemiology and will provide a foundation for the discussion of specific ethical issues in the classroom and in professional practice. Guidelines however, do not provide the final word on ethical issues. Specific precisions in particular cases require judgments made upon reflection of the core values, obligations, and virtues described in the guidelines. From our review, we conclude that a new set of guidelines is reasonable and warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-280
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethics
Epidemiology
Guidelines
Professional Practice
Organizations
Education

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Ethics
  • Guidelines
  • Professional Practice
  • Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

New ethics guidelines for epidemiology : Background and rationale. / Weed, Douglas L.; Coughlin, Steven Scott.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 9, No. 5, 01.07.1999, p. 277-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbfca10d7dca4ccc81311177ae1d70fd,
title = "New ethics guidelines for epidemiology: Background and rationale",
abstract = "In the past decade, at least four sets of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists have been prepared by various national and international organizations. None, however, have been officially adopted by the American College of Epidemiology (ACE). Recently, the ACE asked its Ethics and Standards of Practice (ESOP) Committee to produce ethics guidelines. In this paper, we explain the context and rationale for this effort, describe the purpose and content of ethics guidelines in epidemiology, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Three issues that are central to the mission of ACE-education, policy, and advocacy-are inadequately addressed in existing ethics guidelines. In addition, ethics guidelines are not static documents; they should reflect the changing role of epidemiologists in society, including issues arising in emerging subspecialty areas. New, more dynamic, guidelines that emphasize core values, obligations, and virtues, may help to further define and legitimize the profession of epidemiology and will provide a foundation for the discussion of specific ethical issues in the classroom and in professional practice. Guidelines however, do not provide the final word on ethical issues. Specific precisions in particular cases require judgments made upon reflection of the core values, obligations, and virtues described in the guidelines. From our review, we conclude that a new set of guidelines is reasonable and warranted.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Ethics, Guidelines, Professional Practice, Values",
author = "Weed, {Douglas L.} and Coughlin, {Steven Scott}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1047-2797(99)00012-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "277--280",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New ethics guidelines for epidemiology

T2 - Background and rationale

AU - Weed, Douglas L.

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

PY - 1999/7/1

Y1 - 1999/7/1

N2 - In the past decade, at least four sets of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists have been prepared by various national and international organizations. None, however, have been officially adopted by the American College of Epidemiology (ACE). Recently, the ACE asked its Ethics and Standards of Practice (ESOP) Committee to produce ethics guidelines. In this paper, we explain the context and rationale for this effort, describe the purpose and content of ethics guidelines in epidemiology, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Three issues that are central to the mission of ACE-education, policy, and advocacy-are inadequately addressed in existing ethics guidelines. In addition, ethics guidelines are not static documents; they should reflect the changing role of epidemiologists in society, including issues arising in emerging subspecialty areas. New, more dynamic, guidelines that emphasize core values, obligations, and virtues, may help to further define and legitimize the profession of epidemiology and will provide a foundation for the discussion of specific ethical issues in the classroom and in professional practice. Guidelines however, do not provide the final word on ethical issues. Specific precisions in particular cases require judgments made upon reflection of the core values, obligations, and virtues described in the guidelines. From our review, we conclude that a new set of guidelines is reasonable and warranted.

AB - In the past decade, at least four sets of ethics guidelines for epidemiologists have been prepared by various national and international organizations. None, however, have been officially adopted by the American College of Epidemiology (ACE). Recently, the ACE asked its Ethics and Standards of Practice (ESOP) Committee to produce ethics guidelines. In this paper, we explain the context and rationale for this effort, describe the purpose and content of ethics guidelines in epidemiology, and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Three issues that are central to the mission of ACE-education, policy, and advocacy-are inadequately addressed in existing ethics guidelines. In addition, ethics guidelines are not static documents; they should reflect the changing role of epidemiologists in society, including issues arising in emerging subspecialty areas. New, more dynamic, guidelines that emphasize core values, obligations, and virtues, may help to further define and legitimize the profession of epidemiology and will provide a foundation for the discussion of specific ethical issues in the classroom and in professional practice. Guidelines however, do not provide the final word on ethical issues. Specific precisions in particular cases require judgments made upon reflection of the core values, obligations, and virtues described in the guidelines. From our review, we conclude that a new set of guidelines is reasonable and warranted.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Ethics

KW - Guidelines

KW - Professional Practice

KW - Values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033039163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033039163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1047-2797(99)00012-5

DO - 10.1016/S1047-2797(99)00012-5

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 277

EP - 280

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 5

ER -