Nipple reconstruction: The top hat technique

Gloria M Gamboa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new surgical technique was evaluated in 23 nipple-areola complex reconstructions in 18 consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction techniques. The author used 2 rows of pursestring sutures, one at the base of the neonipple and the other at the periphery of the neoareola. The pursestring sutures act as a supporting platform. The nipple projection was created by suturing in a vertical fashion: 4 horizontal incisions creating 4 supporting pillars. The Montgomery tubercles were simulated by secondary healing of 2- or 3-mm randomly placed stab incisions in the neoareola. The micropigmentation of the nipple-areola complex was performed preferably 6 weeks before the nipple-areola reconstructions. The mean follow-up time was 18 months. The average nipple projection was 6 mm, and the average diameter was 10 mm. Two patients presented with partial loss of nipple projection. Overall, more than 90% of the patients were satisfied with this procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-246
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Plastic Surgery
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

Nipples
Sutures
Mammaplasty

Keywords

  • Breast reconstruction
  • Nipple reconstruction
  • Top hat technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Nipple reconstruction : The top hat technique. / Gamboa, Gloria M.

In: Annals of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.03.2005, p. 243-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gamboa, Gloria M. / Nipple reconstruction : The top hat technique. In: Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 243-246.
@article{39fc3df10904487395f611de1e8833ea,
title = "Nipple reconstruction: The top hat technique",
abstract = "A new surgical technique was evaluated in 23 nipple-areola complex reconstructions in 18 consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction techniques. The author used 2 rows of pursestring sutures, one at the base of the neonipple and the other at the periphery of the neoareola. The pursestring sutures act as a supporting platform. The nipple projection was created by suturing in a vertical fashion: 4 horizontal incisions creating 4 supporting pillars. The Montgomery tubercles were simulated by secondary healing of 2- or 3-mm randomly placed stab incisions in the neoareola. The micropigmentation of the nipple-areola complex was performed preferably 6 weeks before the nipple-areola reconstructions. The mean follow-up time was 18 months. The average nipple projection was 6 mm, and the average diameter was 10 mm. Two patients presented with partial loss of nipple projection. Overall, more than 90{\%} of the patients were satisfied with this procedure.",
keywords = "Breast reconstruction, Nipple reconstruction, Top hat technique",
author = "Gamboa, {Gloria M}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.sap.0000153080.72286.27",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "243--246",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nipple reconstruction

T2 - The top hat technique

AU - Gamboa, Gloria M

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - A new surgical technique was evaluated in 23 nipple-areola complex reconstructions in 18 consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction techniques. The author used 2 rows of pursestring sutures, one at the base of the neonipple and the other at the periphery of the neoareola. The pursestring sutures act as a supporting platform. The nipple projection was created by suturing in a vertical fashion: 4 horizontal incisions creating 4 supporting pillars. The Montgomery tubercles were simulated by secondary healing of 2- or 3-mm randomly placed stab incisions in the neoareola. The micropigmentation of the nipple-areola complex was performed preferably 6 weeks before the nipple-areola reconstructions. The mean follow-up time was 18 months. The average nipple projection was 6 mm, and the average diameter was 10 mm. Two patients presented with partial loss of nipple projection. Overall, more than 90% of the patients were satisfied with this procedure.

AB - A new surgical technique was evaluated in 23 nipple-areola complex reconstructions in 18 consecutive patients who underwent breast reconstruction techniques. The author used 2 rows of pursestring sutures, one at the base of the neonipple and the other at the periphery of the neoareola. The pursestring sutures act as a supporting platform. The nipple projection was created by suturing in a vertical fashion: 4 horizontal incisions creating 4 supporting pillars. The Montgomery tubercles were simulated by secondary healing of 2- or 3-mm randomly placed stab incisions in the neoareola. The micropigmentation of the nipple-areola complex was performed preferably 6 weeks before the nipple-areola reconstructions. The mean follow-up time was 18 months. The average nipple projection was 6 mm, and the average diameter was 10 mm. Two patients presented with partial loss of nipple projection. Overall, more than 90% of the patients were satisfied with this procedure.

KW - Breast reconstruction

KW - Nipple reconstruction

KW - Top hat technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14044256606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14044256606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sap.0000153080.72286.27

DO - 10.1097/01.sap.0000153080.72286.27

M3 - Article

C2 - 15725823

AN - SCOPUS:14044256606

VL - 54

SP - 243

EP - 246

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

IS - 3

ER -