Normative data for the neurocom sensory organization test in us military special operations forces

Erin R. Pletcher, Valerie J Williams, John P. Abt, Paul M. Morgan, Jeffrey J. Parr, Meleesa F. Wohleber, Mita Lovalekar, Timothy C. Sell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Postural stability is the ability to control the center of mass in relation to a person's base of support and can be affected by both musculoskeletal injury and traumatic brain injury. The NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT) can be used to objectively quantify impairments to postural stability. The ability of postural stability to predict injury and be used as an acute injuryevaluation tool makes it essential to the screening and rehabilitation process. To our knowledge, no published normative data for the SOT from a healthy, highly active population are available for use as a reference for clinical decision making. Objective: To present a normative database of SOT scores from a US Military Special Operations population that can be used for future comparison. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Human performance research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 542 active military operators from Naval Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (n=149), Naval Special Warfare Command, Sea, Air, and Land (n=101), US Army Special Operations Command (n=171), and Air Force Special Operations Command (n =121). Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants performed each of the 6 SOT conditions 3 times. Scores for each condition, total equilibrium composite score, and ratio scores for the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems were recorded. Results: Differences were present across all groups for SOT conditions 1 (P , .001), 2 (P =.001), 4 (P . .001), 5 (P . .001), and 6 (P =.001) and total equilibrium composite (P =.000), visual (P . .001), vestibular (P=.002), and preference (P . .001) NeuroCom scores. Conclusions: Statistical differences were evident in the distribution of postural stability across US Special Operations Forces personnel. This normative database for postural stability, as assessed by the NeuroCom SOT, can provide context when clinicians assess a Special Operations Forces population or any other groups that maintain a high level of conditioning and training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-136
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Athletic Training
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Air
Databases
Population
Wounds and Injuries
Oceans and Seas
Rehabilitation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Warfare
Clinical Decision-Making
Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Neurocom
  • Normative data
  • Sensory organization test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Normative data for the neurocom sensory organization test in us military special operations forces. / Pletcher, Erin R.; Williams, Valerie J; Abt, John P.; Morgan, Paul M.; Parr, Jeffrey J.; Wohleber, Meleesa F.; Lovalekar, Mita; Sell, Timothy C.

In: Journal of Athletic Training, Vol. 52, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 129-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pletcher, ER, Williams, VJ, Abt, JP, Morgan, PM, Parr, JJ, Wohleber, MF, Lovalekar, M & Sell, TC 2017, 'Normative data for the neurocom sensory organization test in us military special operations forces', Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 129-136. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.05
Pletcher, Erin R. ; Williams, Valerie J ; Abt, John P. ; Morgan, Paul M. ; Parr, Jeffrey J. ; Wohleber, Meleesa F. ; Lovalekar, Mita ; Sell, Timothy C. / Normative data for the neurocom sensory organization test in us military special operations forces. In: Journal of Athletic Training. 2017 ; Vol. 52, No. 2. pp. 129-136.
@article{80b358fb4ddd4ad081b825190c4626e8,
title = "Normative data for the neurocom sensory organization test in us military special operations forces",
abstract = "Context: Postural stability is the ability to control the center of mass in relation to a person's base of support and can be affected by both musculoskeletal injury and traumatic brain injury. The NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT) can be used to objectively quantify impairments to postural stability. The ability of postural stability to predict injury and be used as an acute injuryevaluation tool makes it essential to the screening and rehabilitation process. To our knowledge, no published normative data for the SOT from a healthy, highly active population are available for use as a reference for clinical decision making. Objective: To present a normative database of SOT scores from a US Military Special Operations population that can be used for future comparison. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Human performance research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 542 active military operators from Naval Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (n=149), Naval Special Warfare Command, Sea, Air, and Land (n=101), US Army Special Operations Command (n=171), and Air Force Special Operations Command (n =121). Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants performed each of the 6 SOT conditions 3 times. Scores for each condition, total equilibrium composite score, and ratio scores for the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems were recorded. Results: Differences were present across all groups for SOT conditions 1 (P , .001), 2 (P =.001), 4 (P . .001), 5 (P . .001), and 6 (P =.001) and total equilibrium composite (P =.000), visual (P . .001), vestibular (P=.002), and preference (P . .001) NeuroCom scores. Conclusions: Statistical differences were evident in the distribution of postural stability across US Special Operations Forces personnel. This normative database for postural stability, as assessed by the NeuroCom SOT, can provide context when clinicians assess a Special Operations Forces population or any other groups that maintain a high level of conditioning and training.",
keywords = "Neurocom, Normative data, Sensory organization test",
author = "Pletcher, {Erin R.} and Williams, {Valerie J} and Abt, {John P.} and Morgan, {Paul M.} and Parr, {Jeffrey J.} and Wohleber, {Meleesa F.} and Mita Lovalekar and Sell, {Timothy C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.05",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "129--136",
journal = "Journal of Athletic Training",
issn = "1062-6050",
publisher = "National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normative data for the neurocom sensory organization test in us military special operations forces

AU - Pletcher, Erin R.

AU - Williams, Valerie J

AU - Abt, John P.

AU - Morgan, Paul M.

AU - Parr, Jeffrey J.

AU - Wohleber, Meleesa F.

AU - Lovalekar, Mita

AU - Sell, Timothy C.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Context: Postural stability is the ability to control the center of mass in relation to a person's base of support and can be affected by both musculoskeletal injury and traumatic brain injury. The NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT) can be used to objectively quantify impairments to postural stability. The ability of postural stability to predict injury and be used as an acute injuryevaluation tool makes it essential to the screening and rehabilitation process. To our knowledge, no published normative data for the SOT from a healthy, highly active population are available for use as a reference for clinical decision making. Objective: To present a normative database of SOT scores from a US Military Special Operations population that can be used for future comparison. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Human performance research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 542 active military operators from Naval Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (n=149), Naval Special Warfare Command, Sea, Air, and Land (n=101), US Army Special Operations Command (n=171), and Air Force Special Operations Command (n =121). Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants performed each of the 6 SOT conditions 3 times. Scores for each condition, total equilibrium composite score, and ratio scores for the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems were recorded. Results: Differences were present across all groups for SOT conditions 1 (P , .001), 2 (P =.001), 4 (P . .001), 5 (P . .001), and 6 (P =.001) and total equilibrium composite (P =.000), visual (P . .001), vestibular (P=.002), and preference (P . .001) NeuroCom scores. Conclusions: Statistical differences were evident in the distribution of postural stability across US Special Operations Forces personnel. This normative database for postural stability, as assessed by the NeuroCom SOT, can provide context when clinicians assess a Special Operations Forces population or any other groups that maintain a high level of conditioning and training.

AB - Context: Postural stability is the ability to control the center of mass in relation to a person's base of support and can be affected by both musculoskeletal injury and traumatic brain injury. The NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT) can be used to objectively quantify impairments to postural stability. The ability of postural stability to predict injury and be used as an acute injuryevaluation tool makes it essential to the screening and rehabilitation process. To our knowledge, no published normative data for the SOT from a healthy, highly active population are available for use as a reference for clinical decision making. Objective: To present a normative database of SOT scores from a US Military Special Operations population that can be used for future comparison. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Human performance research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 542 active military operators from Naval Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (n=149), Naval Special Warfare Command, Sea, Air, and Land (n=101), US Army Special Operations Command (n=171), and Air Force Special Operations Command (n =121). Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants performed each of the 6 SOT conditions 3 times. Scores for each condition, total equilibrium composite score, and ratio scores for the somatosensory, visual, and vestibular systems were recorded. Results: Differences were present across all groups for SOT conditions 1 (P , .001), 2 (P =.001), 4 (P . .001), 5 (P . .001), and 6 (P =.001) and total equilibrium composite (P =.000), visual (P . .001), vestibular (P=.002), and preference (P . .001) NeuroCom scores. Conclusions: Statistical differences were evident in the distribution of postural stability across US Special Operations Forces personnel. This normative database for postural stability, as assessed by the NeuroCom SOT, can provide context when clinicians assess a Special Operations Forces population or any other groups that maintain a high level of conditioning and training.

KW - Neurocom

KW - Normative data

KW - Sensory organization test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014956100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014956100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.05

DO - 10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.05

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 129

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Athletic Training

JF - Journal of Athletic Training

SN - 1062-6050

IS - 2

ER -