Number of in-office light-activated bleaching treatments needed to achieve patient satisfaction

Mariella De Silva Gottardi, Martha G Brackett, Van Benjamine Haywood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In-office bleaching has become very popular for patients desiring immediate results. This report discusses the efficacy of in-office bleaching using high-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light on 73 patients in a private practice over 6 months. Method and materials: Thirty-five percent hydrogen peroxide gel was applied to the tooth surfaces, and then both arches were illuminated with the LumaArch unit light for 8 minutes. The entire procedure was completed 3 times for a total application time of 24 minutes. Thereafter, patients returned every 2 weeks for another 24-minute in-office treatment until the patient was satisfied or did not want additional treatment. After completion of bleaching, patients were classified into groups according to the number of treatments they received. When requested, home bleaching was used as a follow-up treatment. The degree of color change and color relapse were evaluated at baseline and immediately, 2 weeks, and 6 months after bleaching. Also evaluated was the number of patients that requested home bleaching. Results: Of the 73 patients who received 1 to 4 in-office bleaching procedures, 58 were satisfied. Twenty-seven patients requested home bleaching. The average color change per appointment was 2.1 to 3.7 units on a 16-scale Vita Classic shade guide. Color relapse was more noticeable at the 2-week interval than at the 6-month postbleaching evaluation. Conclusion: In-office bleaching may be an alternative for patients who do not like home bleaching. In-office treatment may achieve satisfactory results, but often more than 1 visit is necessary to achieve patient satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-120
Number of pages6
JournalQuintessence International
Volume37
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Light
Color
Therapeutics
Recurrence
Xenon
Tungsten
Halogens
Private Practice
Hydrogen Peroxide
Appointments and Schedules
Tooth
Gels

Keywords

  • Bleaching
  • High-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light
  • Home bleaching
  • Inoffice bleaching
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Tooth whitening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Number of in-office light-activated bleaching treatments needed to achieve patient satisfaction. / De Silva Gottardi, Mariella; Brackett, Martha G; Haywood, Van Benjamine.

In: Quintessence International, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 115-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2fa196ec62bb48c080a598971b3e332f,
title = "Number of in-office light-activated bleaching treatments needed to achieve patient satisfaction",
abstract = "Objective: In-office bleaching has become very popular for patients desiring immediate results. This report discusses the efficacy of in-office bleaching using high-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light on 73 patients in a private practice over 6 months. Method and materials: Thirty-five percent hydrogen peroxide gel was applied to the tooth surfaces, and then both arches were illuminated with the LumaArch unit light for 8 minutes. The entire procedure was completed 3 times for a total application time of 24 minutes. Thereafter, patients returned every 2 weeks for another 24-minute in-office treatment until the patient was satisfied or did not want additional treatment. After completion of bleaching, patients were classified into groups according to the number of treatments they received. When requested, home bleaching was used as a follow-up treatment. The degree of color change and color relapse were evaluated at baseline and immediately, 2 weeks, and 6 months after bleaching. Also evaluated was the number of patients that requested home bleaching. Results: Of the 73 patients who received 1 to 4 in-office bleaching procedures, 58 were satisfied. Twenty-seven patients requested home bleaching. The average color change per appointment was 2.1 to 3.7 units on a 16-scale Vita Classic shade guide. Color relapse was more noticeable at the 2-week interval than at the 6-month postbleaching evaluation. Conclusion: In-office bleaching may be an alternative for patients who do not like home bleaching. In-office treatment may achieve satisfactory results, but often more than 1 visit is necessary to achieve patient satisfaction.",
keywords = "Bleaching, High-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light, Home bleaching, Inoffice bleaching, Patient satisfaction, Tooth whitening",
author = "{De Silva Gottardi}, Mariella and Brackett, {Martha G} and Haywood, {Van Benjamine}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "115--120",
journal = "Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)",
issn = "0033-6572",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Number of in-office light-activated bleaching treatments needed to achieve patient satisfaction

AU - De Silva Gottardi, Mariella

AU - Brackett, Martha G

AU - Haywood, Van Benjamine

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - Objective: In-office bleaching has become very popular for patients desiring immediate results. This report discusses the efficacy of in-office bleaching using high-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light on 73 patients in a private practice over 6 months. Method and materials: Thirty-five percent hydrogen peroxide gel was applied to the tooth surfaces, and then both arches were illuminated with the LumaArch unit light for 8 minutes. The entire procedure was completed 3 times for a total application time of 24 minutes. Thereafter, patients returned every 2 weeks for another 24-minute in-office treatment until the patient was satisfied or did not want additional treatment. After completion of bleaching, patients were classified into groups according to the number of treatments they received. When requested, home bleaching was used as a follow-up treatment. The degree of color change and color relapse were evaluated at baseline and immediately, 2 weeks, and 6 months after bleaching. Also evaluated was the number of patients that requested home bleaching. Results: Of the 73 patients who received 1 to 4 in-office bleaching procedures, 58 were satisfied. Twenty-seven patients requested home bleaching. The average color change per appointment was 2.1 to 3.7 units on a 16-scale Vita Classic shade guide. Color relapse was more noticeable at the 2-week interval than at the 6-month postbleaching evaluation. Conclusion: In-office bleaching may be an alternative for patients who do not like home bleaching. In-office treatment may achieve satisfactory results, but often more than 1 visit is necessary to achieve patient satisfaction.

AB - Objective: In-office bleaching has become very popular for patients desiring immediate results. This report discusses the efficacy of in-office bleaching using high-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light on 73 patients in a private practice over 6 months. Method and materials: Thirty-five percent hydrogen peroxide gel was applied to the tooth surfaces, and then both arches were illuminated with the LumaArch unit light for 8 minutes. The entire procedure was completed 3 times for a total application time of 24 minutes. Thereafter, patients returned every 2 weeks for another 24-minute in-office treatment until the patient was satisfied or did not want additional treatment. After completion of bleaching, patients were classified into groups according to the number of treatments they received. When requested, home bleaching was used as a follow-up treatment. The degree of color change and color relapse were evaluated at baseline and immediately, 2 weeks, and 6 months after bleaching. Also evaluated was the number of patients that requested home bleaching. Results: Of the 73 patients who received 1 to 4 in-office bleaching procedures, 58 were satisfied. Twenty-seven patients requested home bleaching. The average color change per appointment was 2.1 to 3.7 units on a 16-scale Vita Classic shade guide. Color relapse was more noticeable at the 2-week interval than at the 6-month postbleaching evaluation. Conclusion: In-office bleaching may be an alternative for patients who do not like home bleaching. In-office treatment may achieve satisfactory results, but often more than 1 visit is necessary to achieve patient satisfaction.

KW - Bleaching

KW - High-intensity xenon halogen tungsten light

KW - Home bleaching

KW - Inoffice bleaching

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Tooth whitening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31144447025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31144447025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 115

EP - 120

JO - Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)

JF - Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)

SN - 0033-6572

IS - 2

ER -