Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH

Farnoosh Nik-Ahd, Lauren E. Howard, William J. Aronson, Martha K. Terris, Zachary Klaassen, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Christopher L. Amling, Christopher J. Kane, Stephen J. Freedland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the association between obesity and positive surgical margins in patients undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 3141 men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy and 1625 undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy between 1988 and 2017 at eight Veterans Health Administration hospitals. The positive surgical margin location (peripheral, apical, bladder neck, overall) was determined from pathology reports. We adjusted for age, race, prostate-specific antigen, surgery year, prostate weight, pathological grade group, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, hospital surgical volume and surgical method (in analyses not stratified by surgical method). Interactions between body mass index and surgical approach were tested. Results: Among all patients, higher body mass index was associated with increased odds of overall, peripheral and apical positive surgical margins (OR 1.02–1.03, P ≤ 0.02). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend between higher body mass index and increased odds of bladder neck positive surgical margins (OR 1.03, P = 0.09). Interactions between body mass index and surgical method were significant for peripheral positive surgical margins only (P = 0.024). Specifically, there was an association between body mass index and peripheral positive surgical margins among men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy (OR 1.04, P < 0.001), but not robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (OR 1.00, P = 0.98). Limitations include lacking individual surgeon data and lacking central pathology review. Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort, higher body mass index was associated with increased odds of positive surgical margins at all locations except the bladder neck. Furthermore, there was a significant association between obesity and peripheral positive surgical margins in men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy, but not robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Long-term clinical significance requires further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-857
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Urology
Volume27
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Keywords

  • obesity
  • positive surgical margins
  • prostate cancer
  • retropubic radical prostatectomy
  • robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this