Obesity Paradox: Laboratory Findings in Uncomplicated Obesity. Is Bias a Plausible Explanation?

Okechukwu V. Nwogbo, Asad Ullah, Gurmukh Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Obesity predisposes to multiple diseases, such as heart disease, diabetes, stroke, arthritis, and malignancy. However, obese patients have better outcomes than normal-weight patients with some of these disorders, including those admitted to critical care units. We compared the results for common laboratory tests in patients with uncomplicated obesity against the findings in normal-weight patients. Methods: Patients who had a comprehensive metabolic profile test were identified. Patients with acute and/or chronic debilitating disorders were excluded, and the laboratory parameters were compared among 4 groups based on body mass index. Results: With the exception of elevated triglycerides and lower high-density lipoprotein in obese and morbidly obese patients, laboratory findings were not meaningfully different from those in normal-weight patients. Conclusions: The obesity paradox of better outcomes in obese patients admitted to critical care units could not be explained on the basis of lower additional disease burden necessitating critical care admission due to abnormal laboratory values at the baseline. It is conceivable that unconscious bias against obese patients, with lower disease burden than normal-weight patients, triggers their admission to critical care, thus creating the appearance of better outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-118
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

Keywords

  • Intensive care
  • Laboratory parameters
  • Obesity paradox

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obesity Paradox: Laboratory Findings in Uncomplicated Obesity. Is Bias a Plausible Explanation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this