Observing organizational inequality regimes

Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Dustin R Avent-Holt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After multiple decades stumbling in the status attainment wilderness, the sociological study of inequality is now cultivating a new garden: the workplace generation of inequalities. While our theories have long focused on contextually embedded social relations - often in production - as generating inequality, our methods have lagged, focusing instead on individual status attainment, abstracted from social relations including those at work. In this chapter, we outline first how we got into this mess, and then advocate a principled comparative methodological framework for studying the organizational generation of durable inequalities. We highlight the particular contribution of Randy Hodson to the original critique of individualistic status attainment research and his role in developing alternative methodologies, some of which we think should be further developed today.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-212
Number of pages26
JournalResearch in the Sociology of Work
Volume28
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

regime
Social Relations
workplace
methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Observing organizational inequality regimes. / Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald; Avent-Holt, Dustin R.

In: Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 28, 01.01.2016, p. 187-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{959e7cf525394495beb319e34d722d3d,
title = "Observing organizational inequality regimes",
abstract = "After multiple decades stumbling in the status attainment wilderness, the sociological study of inequality is now cultivating a new garden: the workplace generation of inequalities. While our theories have long focused on contextually embedded social relations - often in production - as generating inequality, our methods have lagged, focusing instead on individual status attainment, abstracted from social relations including those at work. In this chapter, we outline first how we got into this mess, and then advocate a principled comparative methodological framework for studying the organizational generation of durable inequalities. We highlight the particular contribution of Randy Hodson to the original critique of individualistic status attainment research and his role in developing alternative methodologies, some of which we think should be further developed today.",
author = "Donald Tomaskovic-Devey and Avent-Holt, {Dustin R}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S0277-283320160000028013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "187--212",
journal = "Research in the Sociology of Work",
issn = "0277-2833",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observing organizational inequality regimes

AU - Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald

AU - Avent-Holt, Dustin R

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - After multiple decades stumbling in the status attainment wilderness, the sociological study of inequality is now cultivating a new garden: the workplace generation of inequalities. While our theories have long focused on contextually embedded social relations - often in production - as generating inequality, our methods have lagged, focusing instead on individual status attainment, abstracted from social relations including those at work. In this chapter, we outline first how we got into this mess, and then advocate a principled comparative methodological framework for studying the organizational generation of durable inequalities. We highlight the particular contribution of Randy Hodson to the original critique of individualistic status attainment research and his role in developing alternative methodologies, some of which we think should be further developed today.

AB - After multiple decades stumbling in the status attainment wilderness, the sociological study of inequality is now cultivating a new garden: the workplace generation of inequalities. While our theories have long focused on contextually embedded social relations - often in production - as generating inequality, our methods have lagged, focusing instead on individual status attainment, abstracted from social relations including those at work. In this chapter, we outline first how we got into this mess, and then advocate a principled comparative methodological framework for studying the organizational generation of durable inequalities. We highlight the particular contribution of Randy Hodson to the original critique of individualistic status attainment research and his role in developing alternative methodologies, some of which we think should be further developed today.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958170495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958170495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S0277-283320160000028013

DO - 10.1108/S0277-283320160000028013

M3 - Review article

VL - 28

SP - 187

EP - 212

JO - Research in the Sociology of Work

JF - Research in the Sociology of Work

SN - 0277-2833

ER -