Olanzapine in refractory schizophrenia after failure of typical or atypical antipsychotic treatment: An open-label switch study

Jean Pierre Lindenmayer, Pal Czobor, Jan Volavka, Jeffrey A. Lieberman, Leslie Citrome, Brian Sheitman, Miranda Chakos, Joseph Patrick McEvoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: When patients with schizophrenia fail to respond to an atypical antipsychotic, they are sometimes switched to another atypical compound. However, the benefits of such a switch have not been adequately studied. We present an open-label prospective 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder whose treatment resistance to clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol had been determined prospectively. Method: The subjects were 45 inpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who failed to respond to treatment during a 14-week double-blind trial comparing clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. The patients had been selected for participation in the double-blind trial on the basis of a history of suboptimal response to previous treatment. Inclusion criteria for the present study were (1) completion of at least 8 weeks of the 14-week double-blind trial, (2) treatment resistance to 1 of the 4 compounds tested as evidenced by a decrease in total PANSS score of less than 20%, and (3) total PANSS score ≥ 60. Subjects were cross-titrated from the previous double-blind treatment to open-label olanzapine, 10 to 40 mg/day, and were treated for 14 weeks without concomitant psychotropic medication. Patients were evaluated weekly with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions scale, and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. Results: Open-label olanzapine treatment yielded no significant change in PANSS total, positive subscale, or negative subscale scores. There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive factor (mean ± SD change = 0.92 ± 2.27; F = 7.5, df = 1,44; p < .009) and a marginally significant worsening for the excitement factor (mean change = -1.36 ± 4.64; F = 4.0, df =1,44; p < .053). Nine percent of patients (N = 4) were classified as responders using the Kane et al. criteria. The worsening in the PANSS excitement factor was significantly associated with the length of illness (t = -2.10, df = 44, p < .04). There was a nonsignificant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects and a significant increase in weight (mean increase = 3.5 ± 6.2 kg [7.8 ± 13.8 lb]; F = 5.29, df = 1,42; p < .0005). Conclusion: Our results indicate that in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a switch to olanzapine after treatment failure with an atypical agent or haloperidol may not reduce psychopathology in general, but may improve symptoms related to cognitive function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)931-935
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume63
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

olanzapine
Antipsychotic Agents
Schizophrenia
Haloperidol
Risperidone
Clozapine
Psychotic Disorders
Therapeutics
Treatment Failure
Psychopathology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Cognition
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Olanzapine in refractory schizophrenia after failure of typical or atypical antipsychotic treatment : An open-label switch study. / Lindenmayer, Jean Pierre; Czobor, Pal; Volavka, Jan; Lieberman, Jeffrey A.; Citrome, Leslie; Sheitman, Brian; Chakos, Miranda; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 63, No. 10, 01.10.2002, p. 931-935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lindenmayer, Jean Pierre ; Czobor, Pal ; Volavka, Jan ; Lieberman, Jeffrey A. ; Citrome, Leslie ; Sheitman, Brian ; Chakos, Miranda ; McEvoy, Joseph Patrick. / Olanzapine in refractory schizophrenia after failure of typical or atypical antipsychotic treatment : An open-label switch study. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002 ; Vol. 63, No. 10. pp. 931-935.
@article{2ed964ff20694004ab093eb69d4d6e4a,
title = "Olanzapine in refractory schizophrenia after failure of typical or atypical antipsychotic treatment: An open-label switch study",
abstract = "Background: When patients with schizophrenia fail to respond to an atypical antipsychotic, they are sometimes switched to another atypical compound. However, the benefits of such a switch have not been adequately studied. We present an open-label prospective 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder whose treatment resistance to clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol had been determined prospectively. Method: The subjects were 45 inpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who failed to respond to treatment during a 14-week double-blind trial comparing clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. The patients had been selected for participation in the double-blind trial on the basis of a history of suboptimal response to previous treatment. Inclusion criteria for the present study were (1) completion of at least 8 weeks of the 14-week double-blind trial, (2) treatment resistance to 1 of the 4 compounds tested as evidenced by a decrease in total PANSS score of less than 20{\%}, and (3) total PANSS score ≥ 60. Subjects were cross-titrated from the previous double-blind treatment to open-label olanzapine, 10 to 40 mg/day, and were treated for 14 weeks without concomitant psychotropic medication. Patients were evaluated weekly with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions scale, and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. Results: Open-label olanzapine treatment yielded no significant change in PANSS total, positive subscale, or negative subscale scores. There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive factor (mean ± SD change = 0.92 ± 2.27; F = 7.5, df = 1,44; p < .009) and a marginally significant worsening for the excitement factor (mean change = -1.36 ± 4.64; F = 4.0, df =1,44; p < .053). Nine percent of patients (N = 4) were classified as responders using the Kane et al. criteria. The worsening in the PANSS excitement factor was significantly associated with the length of illness (t = -2.10, df = 44, p < .04). There was a nonsignificant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects and a significant increase in weight (mean increase = 3.5 ± 6.2 kg [7.8 ± 13.8 lb]; F = 5.29, df = 1,42; p < .0005). Conclusion: Our results indicate that in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a switch to olanzapine after treatment failure with an atypical agent or haloperidol may not reduce psychopathology in general, but may improve symptoms related to cognitive function.",
author = "Lindenmayer, {Jean Pierre} and Pal Czobor and Jan Volavka and Lieberman, {Jeffrey A.} and Leslie Citrome and Brian Sheitman and Miranda Chakos and McEvoy, {Joseph Patrick}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4088/JCP.v63n1011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "931--935",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Olanzapine in refractory schizophrenia after failure of typical or atypical antipsychotic treatment

T2 - An open-label switch study

AU - Lindenmayer, Jean Pierre

AU - Czobor, Pal

AU - Volavka, Jan

AU - Lieberman, Jeffrey A.

AU - Citrome, Leslie

AU - Sheitman, Brian

AU - Chakos, Miranda

AU - McEvoy, Joseph Patrick

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Background: When patients with schizophrenia fail to respond to an atypical antipsychotic, they are sometimes switched to another atypical compound. However, the benefits of such a switch have not been adequately studied. We present an open-label prospective 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder whose treatment resistance to clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol had been determined prospectively. Method: The subjects were 45 inpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who failed to respond to treatment during a 14-week double-blind trial comparing clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. The patients had been selected for participation in the double-blind trial on the basis of a history of suboptimal response to previous treatment. Inclusion criteria for the present study were (1) completion of at least 8 weeks of the 14-week double-blind trial, (2) treatment resistance to 1 of the 4 compounds tested as evidenced by a decrease in total PANSS score of less than 20%, and (3) total PANSS score ≥ 60. Subjects were cross-titrated from the previous double-blind treatment to open-label olanzapine, 10 to 40 mg/day, and were treated for 14 weeks without concomitant psychotropic medication. Patients were evaluated weekly with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions scale, and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. Results: Open-label olanzapine treatment yielded no significant change in PANSS total, positive subscale, or negative subscale scores. There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive factor (mean ± SD change = 0.92 ± 2.27; F = 7.5, df = 1,44; p < .009) and a marginally significant worsening for the excitement factor (mean change = -1.36 ± 4.64; F = 4.0, df =1,44; p < .053). Nine percent of patients (N = 4) were classified as responders using the Kane et al. criteria. The worsening in the PANSS excitement factor was significantly associated with the length of illness (t = -2.10, df = 44, p < .04). There was a nonsignificant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects and a significant increase in weight (mean increase = 3.5 ± 6.2 kg [7.8 ± 13.8 lb]; F = 5.29, df = 1,42; p < .0005). Conclusion: Our results indicate that in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a switch to olanzapine after treatment failure with an atypical agent or haloperidol may not reduce psychopathology in general, but may improve symptoms related to cognitive function.

AB - Background: When patients with schizophrenia fail to respond to an atypical antipsychotic, they are sometimes switched to another atypical compound. However, the benefits of such a switch have not been adequately studied. We present an open-label prospective 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder whose treatment resistance to clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol had been determined prospectively. Method: The subjects were 45 inpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who failed to respond to treatment during a 14-week double-blind trial comparing clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol. The patients had been selected for participation in the double-blind trial on the basis of a history of suboptimal response to previous treatment. Inclusion criteria for the present study were (1) completion of at least 8 weeks of the 14-week double-blind trial, (2) treatment resistance to 1 of the 4 compounds tested as evidenced by a decrease in total PANSS score of less than 20%, and (3) total PANSS score ≥ 60. Subjects were cross-titrated from the previous double-blind treatment to open-label olanzapine, 10 to 40 mg/day, and were treated for 14 weeks without concomitant psychotropic medication. Patients were evaluated weekly with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions scale, and Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. Results: Open-label olanzapine treatment yielded no significant change in PANSS total, positive subscale, or negative subscale scores. There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive factor (mean ± SD change = 0.92 ± 2.27; F = 7.5, df = 1,44; p < .009) and a marginally significant worsening for the excitement factor (mean change = -1.36 ± 4.64; F = 4.0, df =1,44; p < .053). Nine percent of patients (N = 4) were classified as responders using the Kane et al. criteria. The worsening in the PANSS excitement factor was significantly associated with the length of illness (t = -2.10, df = 44, p < .04). There was a nonsignificant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects and a significant increase in weight (mean increase = 3.5 ± 6.2 kg [7.8 ± 13.8 lb]; F = 5.29, df = 1,42; p < .0005). Conclusion: Our results indicate that in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a switch to olanzapine after treatment failure with an atypical agent or haloperidol may not reduce psychopathology in general, but may improve symptoms related to cognitive function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036773685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036773685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4088/JCP.v63n1011

DO - 10.4088/JCP.v63n1011

M3 - Article

C2 - 12416603

AN - SCOPUS:0036773685

VL - 63

SP - 931

EP - 935

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 10

ER -