Olecranon fractures: Factors influencing re-operation

Mark Christopher Snoddy, Maximilian Frank Lang, Thomas J. An, Phillip Michael Mitchell, William Jeffrey Grantham, Benjamin Scoot Hooe, Harrison Ford Kay, Ritwik Bhatia, Rachel V. Thakore, Jason Michael Evans, William Todd Obremskey, Manish Kumar Sethi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures. Methods: Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF. Results: One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1711-1716
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Olecranon Process
Closed Fractures
Fracture Fixation
Trauma Centers
Infection
Medical Records
Orthopedics
Multivariate Analysis
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Fracture
  • Hardware removal
  • Olecranon
  • Plate fixation
  • Tension band

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Snoddy, M. C., Lang, M. F., An, T. J., Mitchell, P. M., Grantham, W. J., Hooe, B. S., ... Sethi, M. K. (2014). Olecranon fractures: Factors influencing re-operation. International Orthopaedics, 38(8), 1711-1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y

Olecranon fractures : Factors influencing re-operation. / Snoddy, Mark Christopher; Lang, Maximilian Frank; An, Thomas J.; Mitchell, Phillip Michael; Grantham, William Jeffrey; Hooe, Benjamin Scoot; Kay, Harrison Ford; Bhatia, Ritwik; Thakore, Rachel V.; Evans, Jason Michael; Obremskey, William Todd; Sethi, Manish Kumar.

In: International Orthopaedics, Vol. 38, No. 8, 01.01.2014, p. 1711-1716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Snoddy, MC, Lang, MF, An, TJ, Mitchell, PM, Grantham, WJ, Hooe, BS, Kay, HF, Bhatia, R, Thakore, RV, Evans, JM, Obremskey, WT & Sethi, MK 2014, 'Olecranon fractures: Factors influencing re-operation', International Orthopaedics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1711-1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y
Snoddy MC, Lang MF, An TJ, Mitchell PM, Grantham WJ, Hooe BS et al. Olecranon fractures: Factors influencing re-operation. International Orthopaedics. 2014 Jan 1;38(8):1711-1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y
Snoddy, Mark Christopher ; Lang, Maximilian Frank ; An, Thomas J. ; Mitchell, Phillip Michael ; Grantham, William Jeffrey ; Hooe, Benjamin Scoot ; Kay, Harrison Ford ; Bhatia, Ritwik ; Thakore, Rachel V. ; Evans, Jason Michael ; Obremskey, William Todd ; Sethi, Manish Kumar. / Olecranon fractures : Factors influencing re-operation. In: International Orthopaedics. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 8. pp. 1711-1716.
@article{59bd108288b641f0b6c871b3f2ad83b7,
title = "Olecranon fractures: Factors influencing re-operation",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures. Methods: Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF. Results: One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.",
keywords = "Fracture, Hardware removal, Olecranon, Plate fixation, Tension band",
author = "Snoddy, {Mark Christopher} and Lang, {Maximilian Frank} and An, {Thomas J.} and Mitchell, {Phillip Michael} and Grantham, {William Jeffrey} and Hooe, {Benjamin Scoot} and Kay, {Harrison Ford} and Ritwik Bhatia and Thakore, {Rachel V.} and Evans, {Jason Michael} and Obremskey, {William Todd} and Sethi, {Manish Kumar}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1711--1716",
journal = "International Orthopaedics",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Olecranon fractures

T2 - Factors influencing re-operation

AU - Snoddy, Mark Christopher

AU - Lang, Maximilian Frank

AU - An, Thomas J.

AU - Mitchell, Phillip Michael

AU - Grantham, William Jeffrey

AU - Hooe, Benjamin Scoot

AU - Kay, Harrison Ford

AU - Bhatia, Ritwik

AU - Thakore, Rachel V.

AU - Evans, Jason Michael

AU - Obremskey, William Todd

AU - Sethi, Manish Kumar

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures. Methods: Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF. Results: One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures. Methods: Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF. Results: One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.

KW - Fracture

KW - Hardware removal

KW - Olecranon

KW - Plate fixation

KW - Tension band

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905915300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905915300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y

DO - 10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 24893946

AN - SCOPUS:84905915300

VL - 38

SP - 1711

EP - 1716

JO - International Orthopaedics

JF - International Orthopaedics

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 8

ER -