On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists

Justin W. Kung, Yulia V Melenevsky, Mary G. Hochman, Manjiri M. Didolkar, Corrie M. Yablon, Ron L. Eisenberg, Jim S. Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of discrepancy between radiology residents and attending musculoskeletal radiologists in interpretation of oncall musculoskeletal radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of 2219 consecutive musculoskeletal radiology reports on patients who visited the emergency department between January 2009 and December 2010. The images were initially interpreted overnight by on-call residents (postgraduate years 3-5), and a final interpretation was rendered the next morning by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The reports were evaluated for major discrepancies, such as missed fractures, osteomyelitis, foreign bodies, tumors, and acute arthritic conditions, which were defined as cases in which a change in clinical management was needed and required notification of the emergency care provider. RESULTS. The overall discrepancy rate was 1.8% (40/2219). Fractures accounted for 62.5% (25/40) of missed findings. Fractures involving the upper extremity, particularly the hand and wrist (2.2% [9/405]), were the most frequently missed. Radial fractures accounted for 50% (7/14) of the missed upper extremity fractures. Foreign bodies (10% [4/40]) and tumorlike lesions (7.5% [3/40]) accounted for the next most common misses. Finally, independent resident readings in the on-call setting had little adverse effect on patient care. CONCLUSION. In the on-call setting, the low discrepancy rate between interpretations of musculoskeletal radiographs by residents and by musculoskeletal attending radiologists is comparable to that reported for other body parts and modalities. Residents should be aware of the relatively high rate of missed pathologic findings in the upper extremity, especially the radius.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)856-859
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume200
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

Radiology
Upper Extremity
Foreign Bodies
Emergency Medical Services
Osteomyelitis
Wrist
Human Body
Arthritis
Hospital Emergency Service
Reading
Patient Care
Hand
Radiologists
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Discrepancy rates
  • Musculoskeletal radiography
  • Residents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Kung, J. W., Melenevsky, Y. V., Hochman, M. G., Didolkar, M. M., Yablon, C. M., Eisenberg, R. L., & Wu, J. S. (2013). On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists. American Journal of Roentgenology, 200(4), 856-859. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9100

On-call musculoskeletal radiographs : Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists. / Kung, Justin W.; Melenevsky, Yulia V; Hochman, Mary G.; Didolkar, Manjiri M.; Yablon, Corrie M.; Eisenberg, Ron L.; Wu, Jim S.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 200, No. 4, 01.04.2013, p. 856-859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kung, JW, Melenevsky, YV, Hochman, MG, Didolkar, MM, Yablon, CM, Eisenberg, RL & Wu, JS 2013, 'On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 200, no. 4, pp. 856-859. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9100
Kung, Justin W. ; Melenevsky, Yulia V ; Hochman, Mary G. ; Didolkar, Manjiri M. ; Yablon, Corrie M. ; Eisenberg, Ron L. ; Wu, Jim S. / On-call musculoskeletal radiographs : Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2013 ; Vol. 200, No. 4. pp. 856-859.
@article{06fd7710d0324f6cbaf5ca3df3f8965b,
title = "On-call musculoskeletal radiographs: Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of discrepancy between radiology residents and attending musculoskeletal radiologists in interpretation of oncall musculoskeletal radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of 2219 consecutive musculoskeletal radiology reports on patients who visited the emergency department between January 2009 and December 2010. The images were initially interpreted overnight by on-call residents (postgraduate years 3-5), and a final interpretation was rendered the next morning by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The reports were evaluated for major discrepancies, such as missed fractures, osteomyelitis, foreign bodies, tumors, and acute arthritic conditions, which were defined as cases in which a change in clinical management was needed and required notification of the emergency care provider. RESULTS. The overall discrepancy rate was 1.8{\%} (40/2219). Fractures accounted for 62.5{\%} (25/40) of missed findings. Fractures involving the upper extremity, particularly the hand and wrist (2.2{\%} [9/405]), were the most frequently missed. Radial fractures accounted for 50{\%} (7/14) of the missed upper extremity fractures. Foreign bodies (10{\%} [4/40]) and tumorlike lesions (7.5{\%} [3/40]) accounted for the next most common misses. Finally, independent resident readings in the on-call setting had little adverse effect on patient care. CONCLUSION. In the on-call setting, the low discrepancy rate between interpretations of musculoskeletal radiographs by residents and by musculoskeletal attending radiologists is comparable to that reported for other body parts and modalities. Residents should be aware of the relatively high rate of missed pathologic findings in the upper extremity, especially the radius.",
keywords = "Discrepancy rates, Musculoskeletal radiography, Residents",
author = "Kung, {Justin W.} and Melenevsky, {Yulia V} and Hochman, {Mary G.} and Didolkar, {Manjiri M.} and Yablon, {Corrie M.} and Eisenberg, {Ron L.} and Wu, {Jim S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.12.9100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "200",
pages = "856--859",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On-call musculoskeletal radiographs

T2 - Discrepancy rates between radiology residents and musculoskeletal radiologists

AU - Kung, Justin W.

AU - Melenevsky, Yulia V

AU - Hochman, Mary G.

AU - Didolkar, Manjiri M.

AU - Yablon, Corrie M.

AU - Eisenberg, Ron L.

AU - Wu, Jim S.

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of discrepancy between radiology residents and attending musculoskeletal radiologists in interpretation of oncall musculoskeletal radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of 2219 consecutive musculoskeletal radiology reports on patients who visited the emergency department between January 2009 and December 2010. The images were initially interpreted overnight by on-call residents (postgraduate years 3-5), and a final interpretation was rendered the next morning by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The reports were evaluated for major discrepancies, such as missed fractures, osteomyelitis, foreign bodies, tumors, and acute arthritic conditions, which were defined as cases in which a change in clinical management was needed and required notification of the emergency care provider. RESULTS. The overall discrepancy rate was 1.8% (40/2219). Fractures accounted for 62.5% (25/40) of missed findings. Fractures involving the upper extremity, particularly the hand and wrist (2.2% [9/405]), were the most frequently missed. Radial fractures accounted for 50% (7/14) of the missed upper extremity fractures. Foreign bodies (10% [4/40]) and tumorlike lesions (7.5% [3/40]) accounted for the next most common misses. Finally, independent resident readings in the on-call setting had little adverse effect on patient care. CONCLUSION. In the on-call setting, the low discrepancy rate between interpretations of musculoskeletal radiographs by residents and by musculoskeletal attending radiologists is comparable to that reported for other body parts and modalities. Residents should be aware of the relatively high rate of missed pathologic findings in the upper extremity, especially the radius.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of discrepancy between radiology residents and attending musculoskeletal radiologists in interpretation of oncall musculoskeletal radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of 2219 consecutive musculoskeletal radiology reports on patients who visited the emergency department between January 2009 and December 2010. The images were initially interpreted overnight by on-call residents (postgraduate years 3-5), and a final interpretation was rendered the next morning by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The reports were evaluated for major discrepancies, such as missed fractures, osteomyelitis, foreign bodies, tumors, and acute arthritic conditions, which were defined as cases in which a change in clinical management was needed and required notification of the emergency care provider. RESULTS. The overall discrepancy rate was 1.8% (40/2219). Fractures accounted for 62.5% (25/40) of missed findings. Fractures involving the upper extremity, particularly the hand and wrist (2.2% [9/405]), were the most frequently missed. Radial fractures accounted for 50% (7/14) of the missed upper extremity fractures. Foreign bodies (10% [4/40]) and tumorlike lesions (7.5% [3/40]) accounted for the next most common misses. Finally, independent resident readings in the on-call setting had little adverse effect on patient care. CONCLUSION. In the on-call setting, the low discrepancy rate between interpretations of musculoskeletal radiographs by residents and by musculoskeletal attending radiologists is comparable to that reported for other body parts and modalities. Residents should be aware of the relatively high rate of missed pathologic findings in the upper extremity, especially the radius.

KW - Discrepancy rates

KW - Musculoskeletal radiography

KW - Residents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878249017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878249017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.12.9100

DO - 10.2214/AJR.12.9100

M3 - Article

C2 - 23521460

AN - SCOPUS:84878249017

VL - 200

SP - 856

EP - 859

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 4

ER -