One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations

M. G. Brackett; A. Dib; W. W. Brackett; B. E. Estrada; A. A. Reyes

One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations

M. G. Brackett, A. Dib, W. W. Brackett, B. E. Estrada, A. A. Reyes

Restorative Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	112-116
Number of pages	5
Journal	Operative dentistry
Volume	27
Issue number	2
State	Published - Mar 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Dentistry

Cite this

@article{5002a1c9b1444e5ebc8aff6f51e5546c,

title = "One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations",

abstract = "This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.",

author = "Brackett, {M. G.} and A. Dib and Brackett, {W. W.} and Estrada, {B. E.} and Reyes, {A. A.}",

year = "2002",

month = mar,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "27",

pages = "112--116",

journal = "Operative dentistry",

issn = "0361-7734",

publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations

AU - Brackett, M. G.

AU - Dib, A.

AU - Brackett, W. W.

AU - Estrada, B. E.

AU - Reyes, A. A.

PY - 2002/3

Y1 - 2002/3

N2 - This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

AB - This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036514814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036514814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11931132

AN - SCOPUS:0036514814

SN - 0361-7734

VL - 27

SP - 112

EP - 116

JO - Operative dentistry

JF - Operative dentistry

IS - 2

ER -

One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this