One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations

M. G. Brackett, A. Dib, W. W. Brackett, B. E. Estrada, A. A. Reyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-116
Number of pages5
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume27
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2002

Fingerprint

Root Caries
Tooth Preparation
United States Public Health Service
Composite Resins
Dentin
Dental Enamel
Adhesives
glass ionomer
Fuji II LC cement
Clinical Studies
single bond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations. / Brackett, M. G.; Dib, A.; Brackett, W. W.; Estrada, B. E.; Reyes, A. A.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.03.2002, p. 112-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5002a1c9b1444e5ebc8aff6f51e5546c,
title = "One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations",
abstract = "This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.",
author = "Brackett, {M. G.} and A. Dib and Brackett, {W. W.} and Estrada, {B. E.} and Reyes, {A. A.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "112--116",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared class V restorations

AU - Brackett, M. G.

AU - Dib, A.

AU - Brackett, W. W.

AU - Estrada, B. E.

AU - Reyes, A. A.

PY - 2002/3/1

Y1 - 2002/3/1

N2 - This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

AB - This study evaluated the clinical performance and appearance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite over one year. Thirty-seven pairs of restorations of Fuji II LC and Z250/Single Bond were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months, using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. No significant difference (p>0.05) was observed in performance of both materials, although retention of the Z250 restorations was below the minimum specified in the ADA Acceptance Program for Dentin and Enamel Adhesives. Little difference in the restorations' appearance was observed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036514814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036514814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 112

EP - 116

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 2

ER -