Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

William B. Newton, Mrinal Shukla, Jeanette S. Andrews, Kimberley J. Hansen, Matthew A. Corriere, Philip P. Goodney, Matthew S. Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Outcomes and predictors of acute surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were examined using the American College of Surgeons-National Safety and Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) Database (2005 to 2008). Methods: Acute intraoperative surgical conversions occurring during elective EVAR were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nonemergent EVAR and primary open surgical repairs of infrarenal aneurysms were examined for comparison. Perioperative morbidity was categorized as wound, pulmonary, venous thromboembolic, genitourinary, cardiovascular, operative, and septic. Mortality, overall morbidity, and length of stay (LOS) were examined. Results: We identified 72 acute conversions, 2414 open repairs, and 6332 EVAR without acute conversion. Demographics and comorbidities were generally similar among operative groups. Mean operative time was 274 minutes for acute conversion vs 226 minutes for primary open repair and 162 minutes for EVAR (conversion vs EVAR and open repair vs EVAR P < .0001 for each; conversion vs open repair P = .0014; analysis on rank operative time). Blood transfusion was required in 69% of acute conversions (mean volume, 6.0 units) vs 73% of open repairs (mean volume, 3.3 units) and 12% of EVARs (mean volume, 2.6 units; P < .0001 for each pair-wise comparison; analysis on rank number of units among those transfused). Major morbidity was 28% for acute conversions, 28% for open repairs, and 12% for EVARs. Mortality was 4.2% for acute conversions, 3.2% for open repairs, and 1.3% for EVARs. Median (quartile 1, quartile 3) LOS was 7 (5, 9) days for acute conversion and open repair, and 2 (1, 3) days for EVAR. Morbidity and mortality were significantly higher for acute conversion and open repair vs EVAR. The OR (95% confidence interval) for morbidity was 2.9 (1.7-4.8) after conversion and 2.8 (2.5-3.2) after open repair (P < .0001 for both) and for mortality was 3.4 (1.0-10.9; P = .0437) for conversion and 2.5 (1.9-3.5; P < .0001) for open repair. Morbidity and mortality were similar between acute conversion and open repair. A similar pattern among repair groups was demonstrated for LOS, with similar LOS for acute conversions and open repair, which were significantly longer than those observed for EVAR. No significant demographic or medical risk factor predictors of acute conversion during EVAR were identified. Conclusion: Acute surgical conversion was a rare complication affecting 1.1% of EVAR cases, with no broadly identifiable at-risk population. When conversion did occur, morbidity and mortality rates paralleled those observed for elective open repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1244-1250
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aortic Aneurysm
Morbidity
Mortality
Length of Stay
Operative Time
Current Procedural Terminology
Demography
Quality Improvement
Blood Transfusion
Aneurysm
Comorbidity
Databases
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Newton, W. B., Shukla, M., Andrews, J. S., Hansen, K. J., Corriere, M. A., Goodney, P. P., & Edwards, M. S. (2011). Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 54(5), 1244-1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.046

Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. / Newton, William B.; Shukla, Mrinal; Andrews, Jeanette S.; Hansen, Kimberley J.; Corriere, Matthew A.; Goodney, Philip P.; Edwards, Matthew S.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 54, No. 5, 01.11.2011, p. 1244-1250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newton, WB, Shukla, M, Andrews, JS, Hansen, KJ, Corriere, MA, Goodney, PP & Edwards, MS 2011, 'Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1244-1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.046
Newton, William B. ; Shukla, Mrinal ; Andrews, Jeanette S. ; Hansen, Kimberley J. ; Corriere, Matthew A. ; Goodney, Philip P. ; Edwards, Matthew S. / Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 54, No. 5. pp. 1244-1250.
@article{7c2205e861224e20a75ce8c417bf7b30,
title = "Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair",
abstract = "Purpose: Outcomes and predictors of acute surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were examined using the American College of Surgeons-National Safety and Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) Database (2005 to 2008). Methods: Acute intraoperative surgical conversions occurring during elective EVAR were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nonemergent EVAR and primary open surgical repairs of infrarenal aneurysms were examined for comparison. Perioperative morbidity was categorized as wound, pulmonary, venous thromboembolic, genitourinary, cardiovascular, operative, and septic. Mortality, overall morbidity, and length of stay (LOS) were examined. Results: We identified 72 acute conversions, 2414 open repairs, and 6332 EVAR without acute conversion. Demographics and comorbidities were generally similar among operative groups. Mean operative time was 274 minutes for acute conversion vs 226 minutes for primary open repair and 162 minutes for EVAR (conversion vs EVAR and open repair vs EVAR P < .0001 for each; conversion vs open repair P = .0014; analysis on rank operative time). Blood transfusion was required in 69{\%} of acute conversions (mean volume, 6.0 units) vs 73{\%} of open repairs (mean volume, 3.3 units) and 12{\%} of EVARs (mean volume, 2.6 units; P < .0001 for each pair-wise comparison; analysis on rank number of units among those transfused). Major morbidity was 28{\%} for acute conversions, 28{\%} for open repairs, and 12{\%} for EVARs. Mortality was 4.2{\%} for acute conversions, 3.2{\%} for open repairs, and 1.3{\%} for EVARs. Median (quartile 1, quartile 3) LOS was 7 (5, 9) days for acute conversion and open repair, and 2 (1, 3) days for EVAR. Morbidity and mortality were significantly higher for acute conversion and open repair vs EVAR. The OR (95{\%} confidence interval) for morbidity was 2.9 (1.7-4.8) after conversion and 2.8 (2.5-3.2) after open repair (P < .0001 for both) and for mortality was 3.4 (1.0-10.9; P = .0437) for conversion and 2.5 (1.9-3.5; P < .0001) for open repair. Morbidity and mortality were similar between acute conversion and open repair. A similar pattern among repair groups was demonstrated for LOS, with similar LOS for acute conversions and open repair, which were significantly longer than those observed for EVAR. No significant demographic or medical risk factor predictors of acute conversion during EVAR were identified. Conclusion: Acute surgical conversion was a rare complication affecting 1.1{\%} of EVAR cases, with no broadly identifiable at-risk population. When conversion did occur, morbidity and mortality rates paralleled those observed for elective open repair.",
author = "Newton, {William B.} and Mrinal Shukla and Andrews, {Jeanette S.} and Hansen, {Kimberley J.} and Corriere, {Matthew A.} and Goodney, {Philip P.} and Edwards, {Matthew S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1244--1250",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of acute intraoperative surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

AU - Newton, William B.

AU - Shukla, Mrinal

AU - Andrews, Jeanette S.

AU - Hansen, Kimberley J.

AU - Corriere, Matthew A.

AU - Goodney, Philip P.

AU - Edwards, Matthew S.

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Purpose: Outcomes and predictors of acute surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were examined using the American College of Surgeons-National Safety and Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) Database (2005 to 2008). Methods: Acute intraoperative surgical conversions occurring during elective EVAR were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nonemergent EVAR and primary open surgical repairs of infrarenal aneurysms were examined for comparison. Perioperative morbidity was categorized as wound, pulmonary, venous thromboembolic, genitourinary, cardiovascular, operative, and septic. Mortality, overall morbidity, and length of stay (LOS) were examined. Results: We identified 72 acute conversions, 2414 open repairs, and 6332 EVAR without acute conversion. Demographics and comorbidities were generally similar among operative groups. Mean operative time was 274 minutes for acute conversion vs 226 minutes for primary open repair and 162 minutes for EVAR (conversion vs EVAR and open repair vs EVAR P < .0001 for each; conversion vs open repair P = .0014; analysis on rank operative time). Blood transfusion was required in 69% of acute conversions (mean volume, 6.0 units) vs 73% of open repairs (mean volume, 3.3 units) and 12% of EVARs (mean volume, 2.6 units; P < .0001 for each pair-wise comparison; analysis on rank number of units among those transfused). Major morbidity was 28% for acute conversions, 28% for open repairs, and 12% for EVARs. Mortality was 4.2% for acute conversions, 3.2% for open repairs, and 1.3% for EVARs. Median (quartile 1, quartile 3) LOS was 7 (5, 9) days for acute conversion and open repair, and 2 (1, 3) days for EVAR. Morbidity and mortality were significantly higher for acute conversion and open repair vs EVAR. The OR (95% confidence interval) for morbidity was 2.9 (1.7-4.8) after conversion and 2.8 (2.5-3.2) after open repair (P < .0001 for both) and for mortality was 3.4 (1.0-10.9; P = .0437) for conversion and 2.5 (1.9-3.5; P < .0001) for open repair. Morbidity and mortality were similar between acute conversion and open repair. A similar pattern among repair groups was demonstrated for LOS, with similar LOS for acute conversions and open repair, which were significantly longer than those observed for EVAR. No significant demographic or medical risk factor predictors of acute conversion during EVAR were identified. Conclusion: Acute surgical conversion was a rare complication affecting 1.1% of EVAR cases, with no broadly identifiable at-risk population. When conversion did occur, morbidity and mortality rates paralleled those observed for elective open repair.

AB - Purpose: Outcomes and predictors of acute surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were examined using the American College of Surgeons-National Safety and Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) Database (2005 to 2008). Methods: Acute intraoperative surgical conversions occurring during elective EVAR were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Nonemergent EVAR and primary open surgical repairs of infrarenal aneurysms were examined for comparison. Perioperative morbidity was categorized as wound, pulmonary, venous thromboembolic, genitourinary, cardiovascular, operative, and septic. Mortality, overall morbidity, and length of stay (LOS) were examined. Results: We identified 72 acute conversions, 2414 open repairs, and 6332 EVAR without acute conversion. Demographics and comorbidities were generally similar among operative groups. Mean operative time was 274 minutes for acute conversion vs 226 minutes for primary open repair and 162 minutes for EVAR (conversion vs EVAR and open repair vs EVAR P < .0001 for each; conversion vs open repair P = .0014; analysis on rank operative time). Blood transfusion was required in 69% of acute conversions (mean volume, 6.0 units) vs 73% of open repairs (mean volume, 3.3 units) and 12% of EVARs (mean volume, 2.6 units; P < .0001 for each pair-wise comparison; analysis on rank number of units among those transfused). Major morbidity was 28% for acute conversions, 28% for open repairs, and 12% for EVARs. Mortality was 4.2% for acute conversions, 3.2% for open repairs, and 1.3% for EVARs. Median (quartile 1, quartile 3) LOS was 7 (5, 9) days for acute conversion and open repair, and 2 (1, 3) days for EVAR. Morbidity and mortality were significantly higher for acute conversion and open repair vs EVAR. The OR (95% confidence interval) for morbidity was 2.9 (1.7-4.8) after conversion and 2.8 (2.5-3.2) after open repair (P < .0001 for both) and for mortality was 3.4 (1.0-10.9; P = .0437) for conversion and 2.5 (1.9-3.5; P < .0001) for open repair. Morbidity and mortality were similar between acute conversion and open repair. A similar pattern among repair groups was demonstrated for LOS, with similar LOS for acute conversions and open repair, which were significantly longer than those observed for EVAR. No significant demographic or medical risk factor predictors of acute conversion during EVAR were identified. Conclusion: Acute surgical conversion was a rare complication affecting 1.1% of EVAR cases, with no broadly identifiable at-risk population. When conversion did occur, morbidity and mortality rates paralleled those observed for elective open repair.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054859491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054859491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.046

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.046

M3 - Article

C2 - 21820835

AN - SCOPUS:80054859491

VL - 54

SP - 1244

EP - 1250

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 5

ER -