Pain management in the prehospital environment

John G. McManus, Donald R. Sallee

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pain measurement and relief is complex, and should be a priority for prehospital providers and supervisors. The available literature continues to prove that we are poor pain relievers, despite the high prevalence of pain in the out-of-hospital patient population. Lack of education and research, along with agent availability, controlled substance regulation, and many myths given credence by health care providers, hinder our ability to achieve adequate pain assessment and treatment in the prehospital setting. Protocols must be established to help guide providers through proper acknowledgment, measurement, and treatment for prehospital pain. Nonpharmacologic therapies must also be taught and reinforced as important adjuncts to pain management. Finally, formation of quality improvement pain programs that evaluate patient outcomes and provider practice patterns will help EMS systems understand the pain management process and provide areas for improvement. Only through emphasis on pain education, research, protocol, and program monitoring development will the quality of pain assessment and management in the prehospital setting improve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-431
Number of pages17
JournalEmergency Medicine Clinics of North America
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Pain
Pain Measurement
Controlled Substances
Education
Aptitude
Quality Improvement
Research
Health Personnel
Therapeutics
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Pain management in the prehospital environment. / McManus, John G.; Sallee, Donald R.

In: Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 415-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{475880bba5cd48d4be59d0d9520bbf47,
title = "Pain management in the prehospital environment",
abstract = "Pain measurement and relief is complex, and should be a priority for prehospital providers and supervisors. The available literature continues to prove that we are poor pain relievers, despite the high prevalence of pain in the out-of-hospital patient population. Lack of education and research, along with agent availability, controlled substance regulation, and many myths given credence by health care providers, hinder our ability to achieve adequate pain assessment and treatment in the prehospital setting. Protocols must be established to help guide providers through proper acknowledgment, measurement, and treatment for prehospital pain. Nonpharmacologic therapies must also be taught and reinforced as important adjuncts to pain management. Finally, formation of quality improvement pain programs that evaluate patient outcomes and provider practice patterns will help EMS systems understand the pain management process and provide areas for improvement. Only through emphasis on pain education, research, protocol, and program monitoring development will the quality of pain assessment and management in the prehospital setting improve.",
author = "McManus, {John G.} and Sallee, {Donald R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.emc.2004.12.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "415--431",
journal = "Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America",
issn = "0733-8627",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain management in the prehospital environment

AU - McManus, John G.

AU - Sallee, Donald R.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Pain measurement and relief is complex, and should be a priority for prehospital providers and supervisors. The available literature continues to prove that we are poor pain relievers, despite the high prevalence of pain in the out-of-hospital patient population. Lack of education and research, along with agent availability, controlled substance regulation, and many myths given credence by health care providers, hinder our ability to achieve adequate pain assessment and treatment in the prehospital setting. Protocols must be established to help guide providers through proper acknowledgment, measurement, and treatment for prehospital pain. Nonpharmacologic therapies must also be taught and reinforced as important adjuncts to pain management. Finally, formation of quality improvement pain programs that evaluate patient outcomes and provider practice patterns will help EMS systems understand the pain management process and provide areas for improvement. Only through emphasis on pain education, research, protocol, and program monitoring development will the quality of pain assessment and management in the prehospital setting improve.

AB - Pain measurement and relief is complex, and should be a priority for prehospital providers and supervisors. The available literature continues to prove that we are poor pain relievers, despite the high prevalence of pain in the out-of-hospital patient population. Lack of education and research, along with agent availability, controlled substance regulation, and many myths given credence by health care providers, hinder our ability to achieve adequate pain assessment and treatment in the prehospital setting. Protocols must be established to help guide providers through proper acknowledgment, measurement, and treatment for prehospital pain. Nonpharmacologic therapies must also be taught and reinforced as important adjuncts to pain management. Finally, formation of quality improvement pain programs that evaluate patient outcomes and provider practice patterns will help EMS systems understand the pain management process and provide areas for improvement. Only through emphasis on pain education, research, protocol, and program monitoring development will the quality of pain assessment and management in the prehospital setting improve.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17044395487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17044395487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.emc.2004.12.009

DO - 10.1016/j.emc.2004.12.009

M3 - Review article

VL - 23

SP - 415

EP - 431

JO - Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America

JF - Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America

SN - 0733-8627

IS - 2

ER -