Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments

a survey of medical directors and department chairs.

Melinda J. Morton, Thomas D. Kirsch, Richard E. Rothman, Marielle M. Byerly, Yu Hsiang Hsieh, John G. McManus, Gabor D. Kelen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To quantify the readiness of individual academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States for an outbreak of pandemic influenza. METHODS, DESIGN, AND SETTING: Cross-sectional assessment of influenza pandemic preparedness level of EDs in the United States via survey of medical directors and department chairs from the 135 academic emergency medicine departments in the United States. Preparedness assessed using a novel score of 15 critical preparedness indicators. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics, chi2, and ANOVA. ED medical directors and department chairs. One hundred and thirty academic emergency medicine departments contacted; 66 (50.4 percent) responded. Approximately half (56.0 percent) stated their ED had a written plan for pandemic influenza response. Mean preparedness score was 7.2 (SD = 4.0) out of 15 (48.0 percent); only one program (1.5 percent) achieved a perfect score. Respondents from programs with larger EDs (= 30 beds) were more likely to have a higher preparedness score (p < 0.035), an ED pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.004) and a hospital pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.007). Respondents from programs with larger EDs were more likely to feel that their ED was prepared for a pandemic or other major disease outbreak (p = 0.01). Only one-third (34.0 percent) felt their ED was prepared for a major disease outbreak, and only 27 percent felt their hospital was prepared to respond to a major disease outbreak. Significant deficits in preparedness for pandemic influenza and other disease outbreaks exist in US EDs, relative to HHS guidelines, which appear to be related in part to ED size. Further study should be undertaken to determine the barriers to appropriate pandemic preparedness, as well as to develop and validate preparedness metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-206
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican journal of disaster medicine
Volume4
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physician Executives
Pandemics
Human Influenza
Disease Outbreaks
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergency Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments : a survey of medical directors and department chairs. / Morton, Melinda J.; Kirsch, Thomas D.; Rothman, Richard E.; Byerly, Marielle M.; Hsieh, Yu Hsiang; McManus, John G.; Kelen, Gabor D.

In: American journal of disaster medicine, Vol. 4, No. 4, 01.01.2009, p. 199-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morton, Melinda J. ; Kirsch, Thomas D. ; Rothman, Richard E. ; Byerly, Marielle M. ; Hsieh, Yu Hsiang ; McManus, John G. ; Kelen, Gabor D. / Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments : a survey of medical directors and department chairs. In: American journal of disaster medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 199-206.
@article{183cb49475ed4f868ce7823d3e67391a,
title = "Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments: a survey of medical directors and department chairs.",
abstract = "To quantify the readiness of individual academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States for an outbreak of pandemic influenza. METHODS, DESIGN, AND SETTING: Cross-sectional assessment of influenza pandemic preparedness level of EDs in the United States via survey of medical directors and department chairs from the 135 academic emergency medicine departments in the United States. Preparedness assessed using a novel score of 15 critical preparedness indicators. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics, chi2, and ANOVA. ED medical directors and department chairs. One hundred and thirty academic emergency medicine departments contacted; 66 (50.4 percent) responded. Approximately half (56.0 percent) stated their ED had a written plan for pandemic influenza response. Mean preparedness score was 7.2 (SD = 4.0) out of 15 (48.0 percent); only one program (1.5 percent) achieved a perfect score. Respondents from programs with larger EDs (= 30 beds) were more likely to have a higher preparedness score (p < 0.035), an ED pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.004) and a hospital pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.007). Respondents from programs with larger EDs were more likely to feel that their ED was prepared for a pandemic or other major disease outbreak (p = 0.01). Only one-third (34.0 percent) felt their ED was prepared for a major disease outbreak, and only 27 percent felt their hospital was prepared to respond to a major disease outbreak. Significant deficits in preparedness for pandemic influenza and other disease outbreaks exist in US EDs, relative to HHS guidelines, which appear to be related in part to ED size. Further study should be undertaken to determine the barriers to appropriate pandemic preparedness, as well as to develop and validate preparedness metrics.",
author = "Morton, {Melinda J.} and Kirsch, {Thomas D.} and Rothman, {Richard E.} and Byerly, {Marielle M.} and Hsieh, {Yu Hsiang} and McManus, {John G.} and Kelen, {Gabor D.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "199--206",
journal = "American journal of disaster medicine",
issn = "1932-149X",
publisher = "Prime National Publishing Corp.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments

T2 - a survey of medical directors and department chairs.

AU - Morton, Melinda J.

AU - Kirsch, Thomas D.

AU - Rothman, Richard E.

AU - Byerly, Marielle M.

AU - Hsieh, Yu Hsiang

AU - McManus, John G.

AU - Kelen, Gabor D.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - To quantify the readiness of individual academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States for an outbreak of pandemic influenza. METHODS, DESIGN, AND SETTING: Cross-sectional assessment of influenza pandemic preparedness level of EDs in the United States via survey of medical directors and department chairs from the 135 academic emergency medicine departments in the United States. Preparedness assessed using a novel score of 15 critical preparedness indicators. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics, chi2, and ANOVA. ED medical directors and department chairs. One hundred and thirty academic emergency medicine departments contacted; 66 (50.4 percent) responded. Approximately half (56.0 percent) stated their ED had a written plan for pandemic influenza response. Mean preparedness score was 7.2 (SD = 4.0) out of 15 (48.0 percent); only one program (1.5 percent) achieved a perfect score. Respondents from programs with larger EDs (= 30 beds) were more likely to have a higher preparedness score (p < 0.035), an ED pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.004) and a hospital pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.007). Respondents from programs with larger EDs were more likely to feel that their ED was prepared for a pandemic or other major disease outbreak (p = 0.01). Only one-third (34.0 percent) felt their ED was prepared for a major disease outbreak, and only 27 percent felt their hospital was prepared to respond to a major disease outbreak. Significant deficits in preparedness for pandemic influenza and other disease outbreaks exist in US EDs, relative to HHS guidelines, which appear to be related in part to ED size. Further study should be undertaken to determine the barriers to appropriate pandemic preparedness, as well as to develop and validate preparedness metrics.

AB - To quantify the readiness of individual academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States for an outbreak of pandemic influenza. METHODS, DESIGN, AND SETTING: Cross-sectional assessment of influenza pandemic preparedness level of EDs in the United States via survey of medical directors and department chairs from the 135 academic emergency medicine departments in the United States. Preparedness assessed using a novel score of 15 critical preparedness indicators. Data analysis consisted of summary statistics, chi2, and ANOVA. ED medical directors and department chairs. One hundred and thirty academic emergency medicine departments contacted; 66 (50.4 percent) responded. Approximately half (56.0 percent) stated their ED had a written plan for pandemic influenza response. Mean preparedness score was 7.2 (SD = 4.0) out of 15 (48.0 percent); only one program (1.5 percent) achieved a perfect score. Respondents from programs with larger EDs (= 30 beds) were more likely to have a higher preparedness score (p < 0.035), an ED pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.004) and a hospital pandemic preparedness plan (p = 0.007). Respondents from programs with larger EDs were more likely to feel that their ED was prepared for a pandemic or other major disease outbreak (p = 0.01). Only one-third (34.0 percent) felt their ED was prepared for a major disease outbreak, and only 27 percent felt their hospital was prepared to respond to a major disease outbreak. Significant deficits in preparedness for pandemic influenza and other disease outbreaks exist in US EDs, relative to HHS guidelines, which appear to be related in part to ED size. Further study should be undertaken to determine the barriers to appropriate pandemic preparedness, as well as to develop and validate preparedness metrics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958097569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958097569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 199

EP - 206

JO - American journal of disaster medicine

JF - American journal of disaster medicine

SN - 1932-149X

IS - 4

ER -