Panorama of reconstruction of skull base defects: From traditional open to endonasal endoscopic approaches, from free grafts to microvascular flaps

Camilo Reyes, Eric Mason, C. Arturo Solares

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction A substantial body of literature has been devoted to the distinct characteristics and surgical options to repair the skull base. However, the skull base is an anatomically challenging location that requires a three-dimensional reconstruction approach. Furthermore, advances in endoscopic skull base surgery encompass a wide range of surgical pathology, frombenign tumors to sinonasal cancer. This has resulted in the creation of wide defects that yield a new challenge in skull base reconstruction. Progress in technology and imaging hasmade this approach an internationally accepted method to repair these defects. Objectives Discuss historical developments and flaps available for skull base reconstruction. Data Synthesis Free grafts in skull base reconstruction are a viable option in small defects and low-flow leaks. Vascularized flaps pose a distinct advantage in large defects and high-flow leaks. When open techniques are used, free flap reconstruction techniques are often necessary to repair large entry wound defects. Conclusions Reconstruction of skull base defects requires a thorough knowledge of surgical anatomy, disease, and patient risk factors associated with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Various reconstruction techniques are available, from free tissue grafting to vascularized flaps. Possible complications that can befall after these procedures need to be considered. Although endonasal techniques are being used with increasing frequency, open techniques are still necessary in selected cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S179-S186
JournalInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

Fingerprint

Skull Base
Transplants
Tissue Transplantation
Surgical Pathology
Free Tissue Flaps
Neoplasms
Anatomy
Technology
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Cerebrospinal fluid leak
  • Dura
  • Endoscopic surgery
  • Pedicled flaps
  • Reconstruction
  • Skull base

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Panorama of reconstruction of skull base defects : From traditional open to endonasal endoscopic approaches, from free grafts to microvascular flaps. / Reyes, Camilo; Mason, Eric; Solares, C. Arturo.

In: International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 18, 01.10.2014, p. S179-S186.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a0a094a45da940a0b9f5dc58d6999be2,
title = "Panorama of reconstruction of skull base defects: From traditional open to endonasal endoscopic approaches, from free grafts to microvascular flaps",
abstract = "Introduction A substantial body of literature has been devoted to the distinct characteristics and surgical options to repair the skull base. However, the skull base is an anatomically challenging location that requires a three-dimensional reconstruction approach. Furthermore, advances in endoscopic skull base surgery encompass a wide range of surgical pathology, frombenign tumors to sinonasal cancer. This has resulted in the creation of wide defects that yield a new challenge in skull base reconstruction. Progress in technology and imaging hasmade this approach an internationally accepted method to repair these defects. Objectives Discuss historical developments and flaps available for skull base reconstruction. Data Synthesis Free grafts in skull base reconstruction are a viable option in small defects and low-flow leaks. Vascularized flaps pose a distinct advantage in large defects and high-flow leaks. When open techniques are used, free flap reconstruction techniques are often necessary to repair large entry wound defects. Conclusions Reconstruction of skull base defects requires a thorough knowledge of surgical anatomy, disease, and patient risk factors associated with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Various reconstruction techniques are available, from free tissue grafting to vascularized flaps. Possible complications that can befall after these procedures need to be considered. Although endonasal techniques are being used with increasing frequency, open techniques are still necessary in selected cases.",
keywords = "Cerebrospinal fluid leak, Dura, Endoscopic surgery, Pedicled flaps, Reconstruction, Skull base",
author = "Camilo Reyes and Eric Mason and Solares, {C. Arturo}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0034-1395268",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "S179--S186",
journal = "International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "1809-9777",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Panorama of reconstruction of skull base defects

T2 - From traditional open to endonasal endoscopic approaches, from free grafts to microvascular flaps

AU - Reyes, Camilo

AU - Mason, Eric

AU - Solares, C. Arturo

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Introduction A substantial body of literature has been devoted to the distinct characteristics and surgical options to repair the skull base. However, the skull base is an anatomically challenging location that requires a three-dimensional reconstruction approach. Furthermore, advances in endoscopic skull base surgery encompass a wide range of surgical pathology, frombenign tumors to sinonasal cancer. This has resulted in the creation of wide defects that yield a new challenge in skull base reconstruction. Progress in technology and imaging hasmade this approach an internationally accepted method to repair these defects. Objectives Discuss historical developments and flaps available for skull base reconstruction. Data Synthesis Free grafts in skull base reconstruction are a viable option in small defects and low-flow leaks. Vascularized flaps pose a distinct advantage in large defects and high-flow leaks. When open techniques are used, free flap reconstruction techniques are often necessary to repair large entry wound defects. Conclusions Reconstruction of skull base defects requires a thorough knowledge of surgical anatomy, disease, and patient risk factors associated with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Various reconstruction techniques are available, from free tissue grafting to vascularized flaps. Possible complications that can befall after these procedures need to be considered. Although endonasal techniques are being used with increasing frequency, open techniques are still necessary in selected cases.

AB - Introduction A substantial body of literature has been devoted to the distinct characteristics and surgical options to repair the skull base. However, the skull base is an anatomically challenging location that requires a three-dimensional reconstruction approach. Furthermore, advances in endoscopic skull base surgery encompass a wide range of surgical pathology, frombenign tumors to sinonasal cancer. This has resulted in the creation of wide defects that yield a new challenge in skull base reconstruction. Progress in technology and imaging hasmade this approach an internationally accepted method to repair these defects. Objectives Discuss historical developments and flaps available for skull base reconstruction. Data Synthesis Free grafts in skull base reconstruction are a viable option in small defects and low-flow leaks. Vascularized flaps pose a distinct advantage in large defects and high-flow leaks. When open techniques are used, free flap reconstruction techniques are often necessary to repair large entry wound defects. Conclusions Reconstruction of skull base defects requires a thorough knowledge of surgical anatomy, disease, and patient risk factors associated with high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Various reconstruction techniques are available, from free tissue grafting to vascularized flaps. Possible complications that can befall after these procedures need to be considered. Although endonasal techniques are being used with increasing frequency, open techniques are still necessary in selected cases.

KW - Cerebrospinal fluid leak

KW - Dura

KW - Endoscopic surgery

KW - Pedicled flaps

KW - Reconstruction

KW - Skull base

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929321063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929321063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1395268

DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1395268

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84929321063

VL - 18

SP - S179-S186

JO - International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 1809-9777

ER -