Party system stability and conflict initiation

Lance Y Hunter, Joseph W. Robbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study of interstate conflict has yielded a voluminous literature to date, yet much of the recent work has only just begun to underscore the importance of domestic factors in predicting conflict initiation in democracies. In short, some of these studies find that when electoral accountability is greater—measured in a variety of ways—interstate conflict becomes less likely. Despite this burgeoning literature, scholars have spent far less time analysing the role linkage institutions, such as stable party systems, have played in foreign policy discussions. To address this gap, we argue that in more stable party systems conflict initiation becomes less likely due to the greater accountability present in these systems. This conjecture is supported by the results of a time-series cross-sectional analysis of 48 democracies from 1978 to 2000 that uses multiple measures of conflict initiation and party system stability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1344-1374
Number of pages31
JournalCambridge Review of International Affairs
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

system stability
party system
democracy
responsibility
foreign policy
time series
present

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Party system stability and conflict initiation. / Hunter, Lance Y; Robbins, Joseph W.

In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 1344-1374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunter, Lance Y ; Robbins, Joseph W. / Party system stability and conflict initiation. In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 1344-1374.
@article{60a90849f32447caafde3ad860829698,
title = "Party system stability and conflict initiation",
abstract = "The study of interstate conflict has yielded a voluminous literature to date, yet much of the recent work has only just begun to underscore the importance of domestic factors in predicting conflict initiation in democracies. In short, some of these studies find that when electoral accountability is greater—measured in a variety of ways—interstate conflict becomes less likely. Despite this burgeoning literature, scholars have spent far less time analysing the role linkage institutions, such as stable party systems, have played in foreign policy discussions. To address this gap, we argue that in more stable party systems conflict initiation becomes less likely due to the greater accountability present in these systems. This conjecture is supported by the results of a time-series cross-sectional analysis of 48 democracies from 1978 to 2000 that uses multiple measures of conflict initiation and party system stability.",
author = "Hunter, {Lance Y} and Robbins, {Joseph W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09557571.2016.1256946",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1344--1374",
journal = "Cambridge Review of International Affairs",
issn = "0955-7571",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Party system stability and conflict initiation

AU - Hunter, Lance Y

AU - Robbins, Joseph W.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - The study of interstate conflict has yielded a voluminous literature to date, yet much of the recent work has only just begun to underscore the importance of domestic factors in predicting conflict initiation in democracies. In short, some of these studies find that when electoral accountability is greater—measured in a variety of ways—interstate conflict becomes less likely. Despite this burgeoning literature, scholars have spent far less time analysing the role linkage institutions, such as stable party systems, have played in foreign policy discussions. To address this gap, we argue that in more stable party systems conflict initiation becomes less likely due to the greater accountability present in these systems. This conjecture is supported by the results of a time-series cross-sectional analysis of 48 democracies from 1978 to 2000 that uses multiple measures of conflict initiation and party system stability.

AB - The study of interstate conflict has yielded a voluminous literature to date, yet much of the recent work has only just begun to underscore the importance of domestic factors in predicting conflict initiation in democracies. In short, some of these studies find that when electoral accountability is greater—measured in a variety of ways—interstate conflict becomes less likely. Despite this burgeoning literature, scholars have spent far less time analysing the role linkage institutions, such as stable party systems, have played in foreign policy discussions. To address this gap, we argue that in more stable party systems conflict initiation becomes less likely due to the greater accountability present in these systems. This conjecture is supported by the results of a time-series cross-sectional analysis of 48 democracies from 1978 to 2000 that uses multiple measures of conflict initiation and party system stability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011685024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011685024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09557571.2016.1256946

DO - 10.1080/09557571.2016.1256946

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011685024

VL - 29

SP - 1344

EP - 1374

JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

SN - 0955-7571

IS - 4

ER -