Paternalism and the female status offender: Remanding the juvenile justice double standard for desexualization

William A. Reese, Russell L. Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using an interactionist conception of delinquency construction, this article empirically examines the commonly assumed, male dominance explanation of the existence of paternalistic punity meted out to female status offenders by juvenile justice officials. To the contrary, these analyses lead to a conclusion of no gender effect across juvenile probation officers in their dispositional recommendations for one female offender. Given the conceptualization of juvenile justice as a people-modulating system, it is suggested that routine referrals, such as female status offenders, elicit normatively prescribed dispositions. Moreover, these sanctions, which impose relatively punitive protection for female adolescents, appear to be institutionalized into the practice of juvenile justice which no longer directly depends on male dominance for its perpetration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-83
Number of pages21
JournalThe Social Science Journal
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Paternalism
paternalism
Social Justice
offender
justice
probation officer
female adolescent
delinquency
sanction
disposition
Referral and Consultation
gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Paternalism and the female status offender : Remanding the juvenile justice double standard for desexualization. / Reese, William A.; Curtis, Russell L.

In: The Social Science Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 63-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d35f1865a09642f4ad401137edd4bf0f,
title = "Paternalism and the female status offender: Remanding the juvenile justice double standard for desexualization",
abstract = "Using an interactionist conception of delinquency construction, this article empirically examines the commonly assumed, male dominance explanation of the existence of paternalistic punity meted out to female status offenders by juvenile justice officials. To the contrary, these analyses lead to a conclusion of no gender effect across juvenile probation officers in their dispositional recommendations for one female offender. Given the conceptualization of juvenile justice as a people-modulating system, it is suggested that routine referrals, such as female status offenders, elicit normatively prescribed dispositions. Moreover, these sanctions, which impose relatively punitive protection for female adolescents, appear to be institutionalized into the practice of juvenile justice which no longer directly depends on male dominance for its perpetration.",
author = "Reese, {William A.} and Curtis, {Russell L.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0362-3319(91)90044-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "63--83",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paternalism and the female status offender

T2 - Remanding the juvenile justice double standard for desexualization

AU - Reese, William A.

AU - Curtis, Russell L.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Using an interactionist conception of delinquency construction, this article empirically examines the commonly assumed, male dominance explanation of the existence of paternalistic punity meted out to female status offenders by juvenile justice officials. To the contrary, these analyses lead to a conclusion of no gender effect across juvenile probation officers in their dispositional recommendations for one female offender. Given the conceptualization of juvenile justice as a people-modulating system, it is suggested that routine referrals, such as female status offenders, elicit normatively prescribed dispositions. Moreover, these sanctions, which impose relatively punitive protection for female adolescents, appear to be institutionalized into the practice of juvenile justice which no longer directly depends on male dominance for its perpetration.

AB - Using an interactionist conception of delinquency construction, this article empirically examines the commonly assumed, male dominance explanation of the existence of paternalistic punity meted out to female status offenders by juvenile justice officials. To the contrary, these analyses lead to a conclusion of no gender effect across juvenile probation officers in their dispositional recommendations for one female offender. Given the conceptualization of juvenile justice as a people-modulating system, it is suggested that routine referrals, such as female status offenders, elicit normatively prescribed dispositions. Moreover, these sanctions, which impose relatively punitive protection for female adolescents, appear to be institutionalized into the practice of juvenile justice which no longer directly depends on male dominance for its perpetration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0005208592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0005208592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0362-3319(91)90044-5

DO - 10.1016/0362-3319(91)90044-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0005208592

VL - 28

SP - 63

EP - 83

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 1

ER -