Patient recall in advanced education in prosthodontics programs in the United States

Fatemeh S. Afshari, Alyson H. Koslow, Kent L. Knoernschild, Cortino Sukotjo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study surveyed program directors of Advanced Education Programs in Prosthodontics (AEPP) in the United States to determine the extent, type, incidence, and perceived effectiveness of implemented recall systems. Material and Methods: Surveys were sent to AEPP directors across the United States to assess their program's recall protocol. This survey first identified whether an active recall program existed. For programs with recall systems, rigor in promoting ongoing oral health was surveyed by focusing on recall frequency, patient tracking protocol, involved personnel, interaction with other university departments, provided clinical procedures, and therapy completion protocol. Whether the directors perceived that their recall system was successful was also investigated.Results: Thirty-three of 46 programs responded, giving a response rate of 72%. Of these 33 programs, only 21 (64%) had an active recall system, although 30 (91%) believed recall to be important. Twelve (57%) directors with recall programs considered their system to be effective.Conclusions: Prosthodontic program directors felt their program's recall effectiveness could be improved. Due to the numerous potential benefits of an active recall system, AEPPs should consider implementing or enhancing their recall programs. Further studies are indicated to determine specific criteria that describe an effective recall system for prosthodontic programs within the context of patient health promotion, program curriculum, and financial ramifications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-320
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Prosthodontics
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prosthodontics
Education
Patient Identification Systems
Oral Health
Program Evaluation
Health Promotion
Curriculum
Incidence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Advanced education program in prosthodontics
  • Maintenance
  • Recall
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Patient recall in advanced education in prosthodontics programs in the United States. / Afshari, Fatemeh S.; Koslow, Alyson H.; Knoernschild, Kent L.; Sukotjo, Cortino.

In: Journal of Prosthodontics, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.06.2010, p. 315-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Afshari, Fatemeh S. ; Koslow, Alyson H. ; Knoernschild, Kent L. ; Sukotjo, Cortino. / Patient recall in advanced education in prosthodontics programs in the United States. In: Journal of Prosthodontics. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 315-320.
@article{2a6a1231c37e4d969f8c2056f6554201,
title = "Patient recall in advanced education in prosthodontics programs in the United States",
abstract = "Purpose: This study surveyed program directors of Advanced Education Programs in Prosthodontics (AEPP) in the United States to determine the extent, type, incidence, and perceived effectiveness of implemented recall systems. Material and Methods: Surveys were sent to AEPP directors across the United States to assess their program's recall protocol. This survey first identified whether an active recall program existed. For programs with recall systems, rigor in promoting ongoing oral health was surveyed by focusing on recall frequency, patient tracking protocol, involved personnel, interaction with other university departments, provided clinical procedures, and therapy completion protocol. Whether the directors perceived that their recall system was successful was also investigated.Results: Thirty-three of 46 programs responded, giving a response rate of 72{\%}. Of these 33 programs, only 21 (64{\%}) had an active recall system, although 30 (91{\%}) believed recall to be important. Twelve (57{\%}) directors with recall programs considered their system to be effective.Conclusions: Prosthodontic program directors felt their program's recall effectiveness could be improved. Due to the numerous potential benefits of an active recall system, AEPPs should consider implementing or enhancing their recall programs. Further studies are indicated to determine specific criteria that describe an effective recall system for prosthodontic programs within the context of patient health promotion, program curriculum, and financial ramifications.",
keywords = "Advanced education program in prosthodontics, Maintenance, Recall, Survey",
author = "Afshari, {Fatemeh S.} and Koslow, {Alyson H.} and Knoernschild, {Kent L.} and Cortino Sukotjo",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00569.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "315--320",
journal = "Journal of Prosthodontics",
issn = "1059-941X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient recall in advanced education in prosthodontics programs in the United States

AU - Afshari, Fatemeh S.

AU - Koslow, Alyson H.

AU - Knoernschild, Kent L.

AU - Sukotjo, Cortino

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Purpose: This study surveyed program directors of Advanced Education Programs in Prosthodontics (AEPP) in the United States to determine the extent, type, incidence, and perceived effectiveness of implemented recall systems. Material and Methods: Surveys were sent to AEPP directors across the United States to assess their program's recall protocol. This survey first identified whether an active recall program existed. For programs with recall systems, rigor in promoting ongoing oral health was surveyed by focusing on recall frequency, patient tracking protocol, involved personnel, interaction with other university departments, provided clinical procedures, and therapy completion protocol. Whether the directors perceived that their recall system was successful was also investigated.Results: Thirty-three of 46 programs responded, giving a response rate of 72%. Of these 33 programs, only 21 (64%) had an active recall system, although 30 (91%) believed recall to be important. Twelve (57%) directors with recall programs considered their system to be effective.Conclusions: Prosthodontic program directors felt their program's recall effectiveness could be improved. Due to the numerous potential benefits of an active recall system, AEPPs should consider implementing or enhancing their recall programs. Further studies are indicated to determine specific criteria that describe an effective recall system for prosthodontic programs within the context of patient health promotion, program curriculum, and financial ramifications.

AB - Purpose: This study surveyed program directors of Advanced Education Programs in Prosthodontics (AEPP) in the United States to determine the extent, type, incidence, and perceived effectiveness of implemented recall systems. Material and Methods: Surveys were sent to AEPP directors across the United States to assess their program's recall protocol. This survey first identified whether an active recall program existed. For programs with recall systems, rigor in promoting ongoing oral health was surveyed by focusing on recall frequency, patient tracking protocol, involved personnel, interaction with other university departments, provided clinical procedures, and therapy completion protocol. Whether the directors perceived that their recall system was successful was also investigated.Results: Thirty-three of 46 programs responded, giving a response rate of 72%. Of these 33 programs, only 21 (64%) had an active recall system, although 30 (91%) believed recall to be important. Twelve (57%) directors with recall programs considered their system to be effective.Conclusions: Prosthodontic program directors felt their program's recall effectiveness could be improved. Due to the numerous potential benefits of an active recall system, AEPPs should consider implementing or enhancing their recall programs. Further studies are indicated to determine specific criteria that describe an effective recall system for prosthodontic programs within the context of patient health promotion, program curriculum, and financial ramifications.

KW - Advanced education program in prosthodontics

KW - Maintenance

KW - Recall

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954565991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954565991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00569.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00569.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20210859

AN - SCOPUS:77954565991

VL - 19

SP - 315

EP - 320

JO - Journal of Prosthodontics

JF - Journal of Prosthodontics

SN - 1059-941X

IS - 4

ER -