Pediatric maxillary fractures

Jack C Yu, Robert Charles Dinsmore, Philip Mar, Kirit Bhatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pediatric craniofacial structures differ from those of adults in many ways. Because of these differences, management of pediatric craniofacial fractures is not the same as those in adults. The most important differences that have clinical relevance are the mechanical properties, craniofacial anatomy, healing capacity, and dental morphology. This article will review these key differences and the management of pediatric maxillary fractures. From the mechanical properties' perspective, pediatric bones are much more resilient than adult bones; as such, they undergo plastic deformation and ductile failure. From the gross anatomic perspective, the relative proportion of the cranial to facial structures is much larger for the pediatric patients and the sinuses are not yet developed. The differences related to dentition and dental development are more conical crowns, larger interdental spaces, and presence of permanent tooth buds in the pediatric population. The fracture pattern, as a result of all the above, does not follow the classic Le Fort types. The maxillomandibular fixation may require circum-mandibular wires, drop wires, or Ivy loops. Interfragmentary ligatures using absorbable sutures play a much greater role in these patients. The use of plates and screws should take into consideration the future development with respect to growth centers and the location of the permanent tooth buds. Pediatric maxillary fractures are not common, require different treatments, and enjoy better long-term outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1247-1250
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Maxillary Fractures
Pediatrics
Tooth
Jaw Fixation Techniques
Bone and Bones
Dentition
Crowns
Sutures
Ligation
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Pediatric factures
  • maxillofacial fractures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Pediatric maxillary fractures. / Yu, Jack C; Dinsmore, Robert Charles; Mar, Philip; Bhatt, Kirit.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.07.2011, p. 1247-1250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yu, JC, Dinsmore, RC, Mar, P & Bhatt, K 2011, 'Pediatric maxillary fractures', Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1247-1250. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6955
Yu, Jack C ; Dinsmore, Robert Charles ; Mar, Philip ; Bhatt, Kirit. / Pediatric maxillary fractures. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 1247-1250.
@article{24ae5ea9439f4b5a9f22604b68d86d28,
title = "Pediatric maxillary fractures",
abstract = "Pediatric craniofacial structures differ from those of adults in many ways. Because of these differences, management of pediatric craniofacial fractures is not the same as those in adults. The most important differences that have clinical relevance are the mechanical properties, craniofacial anatomy, healing capacity, and dental morphology. This article will review these key differences and the management of pediatric maxillary fractures. From the mechanical properties' perspective, pediatric bones are much more resilient than adult bones; as such, they undergo plastic deformation and ductile failure. From the gross anatomic perspective, the relative proportion of the cranial to facial structures is much larger for the pediatric patients and the sinuses are not yet developed. The differences related to dentition and dental development are more conical crowns, larger interdental spaces, and presence of permanent tooth buds in the pediatric population. The fracture pattern, as a result of all the above, does not follow the classic Le Fort types. The maxillomandibular fixation may require circum-mandibular wires, drop wires, or Ivy loops. Interfragmentary ligatures using absorbable sutures play a much greater role in these patients. The use of plates and screws should take into consideration the future development with respect to growth centers and the location of the permanent tooth buds. Pediatric maxillary fractures are not common, require different treatments, and enjoy better long-term outcomes.",
keywords = "Pediatric factures, maxillofacial fractures",
author = "Yu, {Jack C} and Dinsmore, {Robert Charles} and Philip Mar and Kirit Bhatt",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6955",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1247--1250",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pediatric maxillary fractures

AU - Yu, Jack C

AU - Dinsmore, Robert Charles

AU - Mar, Philip

AU - Bhatt, Kirit

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Pediatric craniofacial structures differ from those of adults in many ways. Because of these differences, management of pediatric craniofacial fractures is not the same as those in adults. The most important differences that have clinical relevance are the mechanical properties, craniofacial anatomy, healing capacity, and dental morphology. This article will review these key differences and the management of pediatric maxillary fractures. From the mechanical properties' perspective, pediatric bones are much more resilient than adult bones; as such, they undergo plastic deformation and ductile failure. From the gross anatomic perspective, the relative proportion of the cranial to facial structures is much larger for the pediatric patients and the sinuses are not yet developed. The differences related to dentition and dental development are more conical crowns, larger interdental spaces, and presence of permanent tooth buds in the pediatric population. The fracture pattern, as a result of all the above, does not follow the classic Le Fort types. The maxillomandibular fixation may require circum-mandibular wires, drop wires, or Ivy loops. Interfragmentary ligatures using absorbable sutures play a much greater role in these patients. The use of plates and screws should take into consideration the future development with respect to growth centers and the location of the permanent tooth buds. Pediatric maxillary fractures are not common, require different treatments, and enjoy better long-term outcomes.

AB - Pediatric craniofacial structures differ from those of adults in many ways. Because of these differences, management of pediatric craniofacial fractures is not the same as those in adults. The most important differences that have clinical relevance are the mechanical properties, craniofacial anatomy, healing capacity, and dental morphology. This article will review these key differences and the management of pediatric maxillary fractures. From the mechanical properties' perspective, pediatric bones are much more resilient than adult bones; as such, they undergo plastic deformation and ductile failure. From the gross anatomic perspective, the relative proportion of the cranial to facial structures is much larger for the pediatric patients and the sinuses are not yet developed. The differences related to dentition and dental development are more conical crowns, larger interdental spaces, and presence of permanent tooth buds in the pediatric population. The fracture pattern, as a result of all the above, does not follow the classic Le Fort types. The maxillomandibular fixation may require circum-mandibular wires, drop wires, or Ivy loops. Interfragmentary ligatures using absorbable sutures play a much greater role in these patients. The use of plates and screws should take into consideration the future development with respect to growth centers and the location of the permanent tooth buds. Pediatric maxillary fractures are not common, require different treatments, and enjoy better long-term outcomes.

KW - Pediatric factures

KW - maxillofacial fractures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051548598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051548598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6955

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6955

M3 - Article

C2 - 21772207

AN - SCOPUS:80051548598

VL - 22

SP - 1247

EP - 1250

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 4

ER -