Performance-based visual field testing for drivers with glaucoma: A pilot study

Hannes Devos, Maud Ranchet, Kathryn Elizabeth Bollinger, Amber Conn, Abiodun E. Akinwuntan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Conventional visual field (VF) tests are limited in predicting on-road driving performance of individuals with glaucoma. We developed a new performance-based VF test in a driving simulator for individuals with glaucoma. The aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed test. Methods: In this pilot study, 17 drivers with glaucoma aged 65.24 ± 9.69 and 13 control drivers aged 61.27 ± 11.45 completed the performance-based VF task. Construct validity was determined by comparing performance on the new task with results on conventional visual and perimetry tests including Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Keystone Vision Screener, and Useful Field of View (UFOV). Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing performance on the new task with on-road driving performance, scored using the Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness-to-drive (TRIP). Ten individuals (7 with glaucoma and 3 controls) participated in the test–retest reliability assessment. Results: Drivers with glaucoma identified fewer symbols (P =.047) and took longer to respond to the symbols (P =.048) compared to controls. In the glaucoma group, correct responses on the performance-based VF test correlated strongly (r = −0.51, P =.046) with UFOV divided attention. Both glaucoma and control groups achieved submaximal to maximal scores on the TRIP (median [Q1–Q3], glaucoma: 193 [191–196]; controls: 196 [195–196]; P =.16). No strong correlations were found between scores on the performance-based VF test and on-road driving performance in glaucoma. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.77 for response time and 0.92 for correct responses, indicating good to excellent test–retest reliability. Conclusions: We established the construct validity and test–retest reliability of the performance-based VF test. Future studies should include a larger sample with more severe driving difficulties to demonstrate the concurrent validity between performance-based VF testing and on-road driving performance in glaucoma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)715-721
Number of pages7
JournalTraffic Injury Prevention
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2018

Fingerprint

Visual Fields
Glaucoma
driver
Visual Field Tests
Testing
performance
road
construct validity
Simulators
symbol
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Reaction Time
fitness
psychometrics
Group
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Driving
  • driving simulator
  • glaucoma
  • visual field

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Performance-based visual field testing for drivers with glaucoma : A pilot study. / Devos, Hannes; Ranchet, Maud; Bollinger, Kathryn Elizabeth; Conn, Amber; Akinwuntan, Abiodun E.

In: Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, No. 7, 03.10.2018, p. 715-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devos, Hannes ; Ranchet, Maud ; Bollinger, Kathryn Elizabeth ; Conn, Amber ; Akinwuntan, Abiodun E. / Performance-based visual field testing for drivers with glaucoma : A pilot study. In: Traffic Injury Prevention. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 7. pp. 715-721.
@article{816c99bc85c24fbdbb31fe1774b2bb55,
title = "Performance-based visual field testing for drivers with glaucoma: A pilot study",
abstract = "Objective: Conventional visual field (VF) tests are limited in predicting on-road driving performance of individuals with glaucoma. We developed a new performance-based VF test in a driving simulator for individuals with glaucoma. The aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed test. Methods: In this pilot study, 17 drivers with glaucoma aged 65.24 ± 9.69 and 13 control drivers aged 61.27 ± 11.45 completed the performance-based VF task. Construct validity was determined by comparing performance on the new task with results on conventional visual and perimetry tests including Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Keystone Vision Screener, and Useful Field of View (UFOV). Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing performance on the new task with on-road driving performance, scored using the Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness-to-drive (TRIP). Ten individuals (7 with glaucoma and 3 controls) participated in the test–retest reliability assessment. Results: Drivers with glaucoma identified fewer symbols (P =.047) and took longer to respond to the symbols (P =.048) compared to controls. In the glaucoma group, correct responses on the performance-based VF test correlated strongly (r = −0.51, P =.046) with UFOV divided attention. Both glaucoma and control groups achieved submaximal to maximal scores on the TRIP (median [Q1–Q3], glaucoma: 193 [191–196]; controls: 196 [195–196]; P =.16). No strong correlations were found between scores on the performance-based VF test and on-road driving performance in glaucoma. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.77 for response time and 0.92 for correct responses, indicating good to excellent test–retest reliability. Conclusions: We established the construct validity and test–retest reliability of the performance-based VF test. Future studies should include a larger sample with more severe driving difficulties to demonstrate the concurrent validity between performance-based VF testing and on-road driving performance in glaucoma.",
keywords = "Driving, driving simulator, glaucoma, visual field",
author = "Hannes Devos and Maud Ranchet and Bollinger, {Kathryn Elizabeth} and Amber Conn and Akinwuntan, {Abiodun E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15389588.2018.1508834",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "715--721",
journal = "Traffic Injury Prevention",
issn = "1538-9588",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance-based visual field testing for drivers with glaucoma

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Devos, Hannes

AU - Ranchet, Maud

AU - Bollinger, Kathryn Elizabeth

AU - Conn, Amber

AU - Akinwuntan, Abiodun E.

PY - 2018/10/3

Y1 - 2018/10/3

N2 - Objective: Conventional visual field (VF) tests are limited in predicting on-road driving performance of individuals with glaucoma. We developed a new performance-based VF test in a driving simulator for individuals with glaucoma. The aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed test. Methods: In this pilot study, 17 drivers with glaucoma aged 65.24 ± 9.69 and 13 control drivers aged 61.27 ± 11.45 completed the performance-based VF task. Construct validity was determined by comparing performance on the new task with results on conventional visual and perimetry tests including Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Keystone Vision Screener, and Useful Field of View (UFOV). Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing performance on the new task with on-road driving performance, scored using the Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness-to-drive (TRIP). Ten individuals (7 with glaucoma and 3 controls) participated in the test–retest reliability assessment. Results: Drivers with glaucoma identified fewer symbols (P =.047) and took longer to respond to the symbols (P =.048) compared to controls. In the glaucoma group, correct responses on the performance-based VF test correlated strongly (r = −0.51, P =.046) with UFOV divided attention. Both glaucoma and control groups achieved submaximal to maximal scores on the TRIP (median [Q1–Q3], glaucoma: 193 [191–196]; controls: 196 [195–196]; P =.16). No strong correlations were found between scores on the performance-based VF test and on-road driving performance in glaucoma. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.77 for response time and 0.92 for correct responses, indicating good to excellent test–retest reliability. Conclusions: We established the construct validity and test–retest reliability of the performance-based VF test. Future studies should include a larger sample with more severe driving difficulties to demonstrate the concurrent validity between performance-based VF testing and on-road driving performance in glaucoma.

AB - Objective: Conventional visual field (VF) tests are limited in predicting on-road driving performance of individuals with glaucoma. We developed a new performance-based VF test in a driving simulator for individuals with glaucoma. The aim was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed test. Methods: In this pilot study, 17 drivers with glaucoma aged 65.24 ± 9.69 and 13 control drivers aged 61.27 ± 11.45 completed the performance-based VF task. Construct validity was determined by comparing performance on the new task with results on conventional visual and perimetry tests including Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Keystone Vision Screener, and Useful Field of View (UFOV). Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing performance on the new task with on-road driving performance, scored using the Test Ride for Investigating Practical fitness-to-drive (TRIP). Ten individuals (7 with glaucoma and 3 controls) participated in the test–retest reliability assessment. Results: Drivers with glaucoma identified fewer symbols (P =.047) and took longer to respond to the symbols (P =.048) compared to controls. In the glaucoma group, correct responses on the performance-based VF test correlated strongly (r = −0.51, P =.046) with UFOV divided attention. Both glaucoma and control groups achieved submaximal to maximal scores on the TRIP (median [Q1–Q3], glaucoma: 193 [191–196]; controls: 196 [195–196]; P =.16). No strong correlations were found between scores on the performance-based VF test and on-road driving performance in glaucoma. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.77 for response time and 0.92 for correct responses, indicating good to excellent test–retest reliability. Conclusions: We established the construct validity and test–retest reliability of the performance-based VF test. Future studies should include a larger sample with more severe driving difficulties to demonstrate the concurrent validity between performance-based VF testing and on-road driving performance in glaucoma.

KW - Driving

KW - driving simulator

KW - glaucoma

KW - visual field

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057562155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057562155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15389588.2018.1508834

DO - 10.1080/15389588.2018.1508834

M3 - Article

C2 - 30407083

AN - SCOPUS:85057562155

VL - 19

SP - 715

EP - 721

JO - Traffic Injury Prevention

JF - Traffic Injury Prevention

SN - 1538-9588

IS - 7

ER -