Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates

Sara Khan, Li Na Niu, Ashraf A. Eid, Stephen Warwick Looney, Anthony Didato, Steven Roberts, David Henry Pashley, Franklin Chi Meng Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Injection of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) from the root canal into periapical tissues may result in a NaOCl incident. The purpose of this study was to examine the fluid pressure generated by canal cleansing devices at the apical interface, when the tip of the irrigation device was not binding to the canal walls. Methods: Apical pressure was monitored in a closed-system root canal model, with NaOCl delivered by a syringe pump at 0.5-8 mL/min. Devices tested were VPro EndoSafe, Max-i-Probe, NaviTip, VPro StreamClean, and EndoVac Microcannula. Apical fluid pressure was recorded with a digital manometer (N = 20). The relationships between apical fluid pressure and fluid flow rate were modeled with polynomial regression and analyzed by using the Wald test. Results: EndoVac Microcannula was the only device that was capable of delivering negative apical fluid pressures, in the range of -35 mm Hg, at all fluid flow rates. All other devices generated positive apical pressures that increased nonlinearly with increasing fluid flow rates. These 4 positive pressure delivery devices were capable of generating pressures that exceeded the human central venous pressure (5.88 mm Hg). VPro EndoSafe differed from the other positive pressure delivery devices in that it generated significantly higher positive pressures at all flow rates (P <.0083). Conclusions: Positive apical irrigation pressures in excess of the central venous pressure may be generated by some canal cleansing devices when irrigants are delivered at flow rates higher than 1 mL/min, even when the irrigation needle is not wedged into the canal walls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-533
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

Needles
Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Central Venous Pressure
Dental Pulp Cavity
Periapical Tissue
Sodium Hypochlorite
Syringes
Injections

Keywords

  • Apical fluid pressure
  • fluid flow rate
  • sodium hypochlorite
  • venous pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates. / Khan, Sara; Niu, Li Na; Eid, Ashraf A.; Looney, Stephen Warwick; Didato, Anthony; Roberts, Steven; Pashley, David Henry; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 39, No. 4, 01.04.2013, p. 529-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khan, Sara ; Niu, Li Na ; Eid, Ashraf A. ; Looney, Stephen Warwick ; Didato, Anthony ; Roberts, Steven ; Pashley, David Henry ; Tay, Franklin Chi Meng. / Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 529-533.
@article{38ba8b2880b5440ea91935dd956963b0,
title = "Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates",
abstract = "Introduction: Injection of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) from the root canal into periapical tissues may result in a NaOCl incident. The purpose of this study was to examine the fluid pressure generated by canal cleansing devices at the apical interface, when the tip of the irrigation device was not binding to the canal walls. Methods: Apical pressure was monitored in a closed-system root canal model, with NaOCl delivered by a syringe pump at 0.5-8 mL/min. Devices tested were VPro EndoSafe, Max-i-Probe, NaviTip, VPro StreamClean, and EndoVac Microcannula. Apical fluid pressure was recorded with a digital manometer (N = 20). The relationships between apical fluid pressure and fluid flow rate were modeled with polynomial regression and analyzed by using the Wald test. Results: EndoVac Microcannula was the only device that was capable of delivering negative apical fluid pressures, in the range of -35 mm Hg, at all fluid flow rates. All other devices generated positive apical pressures that increased nonlinearly with increasing fluid flow rates. These 4 positive pressure delivery devices were capable of generating pressures that exceeded the human central venous pressure (5.88 mm Hg). VPro EndoSafe differed from the other positive pressure delivery devices in that it generated significantly higher positive pressures at all flow rates (P <.0083). Conclusions: Positive apical irrigation pressures in excess of the central venous pressure may be generated by some canal cleansing devices when irrigants are delivered at flow rates higher than 1 mL/min, even when the irrigation needle is not wedged into the canal walls.",
keywords = "Apical fluid pressure, fluid flow rate, sodium hypochlorite, venous pressure",
author = "Sara Khan and Niu, {Li Na} and Eid, {Ashraf A.} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick} and Anthony Didato and Steven Roberts and Pashley, {David Henry} and Tay, {Franklin Chi Meng}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "529--533",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Periapical pressures developed by nonbinding irrigation needles at various irrigation delivery rates

AU - Khan, Sara

AU - Niu, Li Na

AU - Eid, Ashraf A.

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

AU - Didato, Anthony

AU - Roberts, Steven

AU - Pashley, David Henry

AU - Tay, Franklin Chi Meng

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Introduction: Injection of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) from the root canal into periapical tissues may result in a NaOCl incident. The purpose of this study was to examine the fluid pressure generated by canal cleansing devices at the apical interface, when the tip of the irrigation device was not binding to the canal walls. Methods: Apical pressure was monitored in a closed-system root canal model, with NaOCl delivered by a syringe pump at 0.5-8 mL/min. Devices tested were VPro EndoSafe, Max-i-Probe, NaviTip, VPro StreamClean, and EndoVac Microcannula. Apical fluid pressure was recorded with a digital manometer (N = 20). The relationships between apical fluid pressure and fluid flow rate were modeled with polynomial regression and analyzed by using the Wald test. Results: EndoVac Microcannula was the only device that was capable of delivering negative apical fluid pressures, in the range of -35 mm Hg, at all fluid flow rates. All other devices generated positive apical pressures that increased nonlinearly with increasing fluid flow rates. These 4 positive pressure delivery devices were capable of generating pressures that exceeded the human central venous pressure (5.88 mm Hg). VPro EndoSafe differed from the other positive pressure delivery devices in that it generated significantly higher positive pressures at all flow rates (P <.0083). Conclusions: Positive apical irrigation pressures in excess of the central venous pressure may be generated by some canal cleansing devices when irrigants are delivered at flow rates higher than 1 mL/min, even when the irrigation needle is not wedged into the canal walls.

AB - Introduction: Injection of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) from the root canal into periapical tissues may result in a NaOCl incident. The purpose of this study was to examine the fluid pressure generated by canal cleansing devices at the apical interface, when the tip of the irrigation device was not binding to the canal walls. Methods: Apical pressure was monitored in a closed-system root canal model, with NaOCl delivered by a syringe pump at 0.5-8 mL/min. Devices tested were VPro EndoSafe, Max-i-Probe, NaviTip, VPro StreamClean, and EndoVac Microcannula. Apical fluid pressure was recorded with a digital manometer (N = 20). The relationships between apical fluid pressure and fluid flow rate were modeled with polynomial regression and analyzed by using the Wald test. Results: EndoVac Microcannula was the only device that was capable of delivering negative apical fluid pressures, in the range of -35 mm Hg, at all fluid flow rates. All other devices generated positive apical pressures that increased nonlinearly with increasing fluid flow rates. These 4 positive pressure delivery devices were capable of generating pressures that exceeded the human central venous pressure (5.88 mm Hg). VPro EndoSafe differed from the other positive pressure delivery devices in that it generated significantly higher positive pressures at all flow rates (P <.0083). Conclusions: Positive apical irrigation pressures in excess of the central venous pressure may be generated by some canal cleansing devices when irrigants are delivered at flow rates higher than 1 mL/min, even when the irrigation needle is not wedged into the canal walls.

KW - Apical fluid pressure

KW - fluid flow rate

KW - sodium hypochlorite

KW - venous pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875260909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875260909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.001

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 529

EP - 533

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 4

ER -