Personality and interpersonal conflict management

Mary E. Utley, Deborah R. Richardson, Constance J. Pilkington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study addressed the extent to which personality factors are related to responses to interpersonal conflict. Two issues were examined: (a) the relationship between personality measures and conflict styles and (b) the consistency of conflict response style across targets. One hundred and fifty-three college students evaluated five different conflict responses as to the frequency with which they used them in interaction with a professor, a parent, and a friend. They also completed the Personality Research Form, a measure of a variety of personality needs. Some of the conflict responses were related to personality needs. Achievement, nurturance, endurance, and social desirability related to an integrating conflict response; dominance and understanding related to dominating. In general, the results of this study point to the importance of both personality and situational (i.e. target) factors in understanding responses to interpersonal conflict. However, because personality factors were not related to all of the conflict responses and because there was some inconsistency in personality/conflict relationships across target, these results suggest that a personality or individual difference approach to the study of interpersonal conflict management may be too restricted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-293
Number of pages7
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Personality
Conflict (Psychology)
Social Desirability
Individuality
Students
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Personality and interpersonal conflict management. / Utley, Mary E.; Richardson, Deborah R.; Pilkington, Constance J.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1989, p. 287-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Utley, Mary E. ; Richardson, Deborah R. ; Pilkington, Constance J. / Personality and interpersonal conflict management. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 1989 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 287-293.
@article{e004232be55a46b5bbde27a6c6056018,
title = "Personality and interpersonal conflict management",
abstract = "This study addressed the extent to which personality factors are related to responses to interpersonal conflict. Two issues were examined: (a) the relationship between personality measures and conflict styles and (b) the consistency of conflict response style across targets. One hundred and fifty-three college students evaluated five different conflict responses as to the frequency with which they used them in interaction with a professor, a parent, and a friend. They also completed the Personality Research Form, a measure of a variety of personality needs. Some of the conflict responses were related to personality needs. Achievement, nurturance, endurance, and social desirability related to an integrating conflict response; dominance and understanding related to dominating. In general, the results of this study point to the importance of both personality and situational (i.e. target) factors in understanding responses to interpersonal conflict. However, because personality factors were not related to all of the conflict responses and because there was some inconsistency in personality/conflict relationships across target, these results suggest that a personality or individual difference approach to the study of interpersonal conflict management may be too restricted.",
author = "Utley, {Mary E.} and Richardson, {Deborah R.} and Pilkington, {Constance J.}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1016/0191-8869(89)90101-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "287--293",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personality and interpersonal conflict management

AU - Utley, Mary E.

AU - Richardson, Deborah R.

AU - Pilkington, Constance J.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - This study addressed the extent to which personality factors are related to responses to interpersonal conflict. Two issues were examined: (a) the relationship between personality measures and conflict styles and (b) the consistency of conflict response style across targets. One hundred and fifty-three college students evaluated five different conflict responses as to the frequency with which they used them in interaction with a professor, a parent, and a friend. They also completed the Personality Research Form, a measure of a variety of personality needs. Some of the conflict responses were related to personality needs. Achievement, nurturance, endurance, and social desirability related to an integrating conflict response; dominance and understanding related to dominating. In general, the results of this study point to the importance of both personality and situational (i.e. target) factors in understanding responses to interpersonal conflict. However, because personality factors were not related to all of the conflict responses and because there was some inconsistency in personality/conflict relationships across target, these results suggest that a personality or individual difference approach to the study of interpersonal conflict management may be too restricted.

AB - This study addressed the extent to which personality factors are related to responses to interpersonal conflict. Two issues were examined: (a) the relationship between personality measures and conflict styles and (b) the consistency of conflict response style across targets. One hundred and fifty-three college students evaluated five different conflict responses as to the frequency with which they used them in interaction with a professor, a parent, and a friend. They also completed the Personality Research Form, a measure of a variety of personality needs. Some of the conflict responses were related to personality needs. Achievement, nurturance, endurance, and social desirability related to an integrating conflict response; dominance and understanding related to dominating. In general, the results of this study point to the importance of both personality and situational (i.e. target) factors in understanding responses to interpersonal conflict. However, because personality factors were not related to all of the conflict responses and because there was some inconsistency in personality/conflict relationships across target, these results suggest that a personality or individual difference approach to the study of interpersonal conflict management may be too restricted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249024608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249024608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90101-3

DO - 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90101-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38249024608

VL - 10

SP - 287

EP - 293

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 3

ER -