Perspectives on faculty clinical practice: Views of occupational therapy curriculum chairpersons and faculty members

Angela E. Scoggin, Robert W Gibson, Carolyn Hanson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objective. This study investigated whether and how faculty clinical practice (FCP) was being implemented in occupational therapy professional education programs. Method. Chairpersons and faculty members from all accredited entry-level occupational therapy curricula in the United States were asked to complete questionnaires about their involvement in FCP. The chairperson questionnaire consisted of primarily closed-ended questions that addressed the organization of faculty practice within their programs, whereas the faculty questionnaire was primarily open-ended and addressed faculty members' individual involvement in FCP as well as the perceived benefits and drawbacks. Responses were analyzed for 39 program chairpersons and 136 faculty members were analyzed. Results. Twenty-five chairperson respondents reported that their educational program had FCP, and 44 faculty respondents indicated involvement in FCP during the past year. FCP was more prevalent in public-funded institutions and academic health centers. Faculty members primarily engaged in FCP in order to stay current, enhance teaching, and develop networks. They reported increased credibility with students as an important benefit of clinical practice. The primary reasons faculty members did not engage in clinical practice were insufficient time and institutional policies. Conclusion. Although many faculty members in occupational therapy education programs value clinical practice as a part of their educator role, it is necessary to negotiate responsibilities and rewards to prevent role overload and comply with institutional policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-540
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Occupational Therapy
Curriculum
Organizational Policy
Professional Education
Reward

Keywords

  • Education
  • Professional practice
  • Role

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Perspectives on faculty clinical practice : Views of occupational therapy curriculum chairpersons and faculty members. / Scoggin, Angela E.; Gibson, Robert W; Hanson, Carolyn.

In: American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 54, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 533-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{dc7295da62584978a7344e562d8089f8,
title = "Perspectives on faculty clinical practice: Views of occupational therapy curriculum chairpersons and faculty members",
abstract = "Objective. This study investigated whether and how faculty clinical practice (FCP) was being implemented in occupational therapy professional education programs. Method. Chairpersons and faculty members from all accredited entry-level occupational therapy curricula in the United States were asked to complete questionnaires about their involvement in FCP. The chairperson questionnaire consisted of primarily closed-ended questions that addressed the organization of faculty practice within their programs, whereas the faculty questionnaire was primarily open-ended and addressed faculty members' individual involvement in FCP as well as the perceived benefits and drawbacks. Responses were analyzed for 39 program chairpersons and 136 faculty members were analyzed. Results. Twenty-five chairperson respondents reported that their educational program had FCP, and 44 faculty respondents indicated involvement in FCP during the past year. FCP was more prevalent in public-funded institutions and academic health centers. Faculty members primarily engaged in FCP in order to stay current, enhance teaching, and develop networks. They reported increased credibility with students as an important benefit of clinical practice. The primary reasons faculty members did not engage in clinical practice were insufficient time and institutional policies. Conclusion. Although many faculty members in occupational therapy education programs value clinical practice as a part of their educator role, it is necessary to negotiate responsibilities and rewards to prevent role overload and comply with institutional policies.",
keywords = "Education, Professional practice, Role",
author = "Scoggin, {Angela E.} and Gibson, {Robert W} and Carolyn Hanson",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5014/ajot.54.5.533",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "533--540",
journal = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0272-9490",
publisher = "American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspectives on faculty clinical practice

T2 - Views of occupational therapy curriculum chairpersons and faculty members

AU - Scoggin, Angela E.

AU - Gibson, Robert W

AU - Hanson, Carolyn

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Objective. This study investigated whether and how faculty clinical practice (FCP) was being implemented in occupational therapy professional education programs. Method. Chairpersons and faculty members from all accredited entry-level occupational therapy curricula in the United States were asked to complete questionnaires about their involvement in FCP. The chairperson questionnaire consisted of primarily closed-ended questions that addressed the organization of faculty practice within their programs, whereas the faculty questionnaire was primarily open-ended and addressed faculty members' individual involvement in FCP as well as the perceived benefits and drawbacks. Responses were analyzed for 39 program chairpersons and 136 faculty members were analyzed. Results. Twenty-five chairperson respondents reported that their educational program had FCP, and 44 faculty respondents indicated involvement in FCP during the past year. FCP was more prevalent in public-funded institutions and academic health centers. Faculty members primarily engaged in FCP in order to stay current, enhance teaching, and develop networks. They reported increased credibility with students as an important benefit of clinical practice. The primary reasons faculty members did not engage in clinical practice were insufficient time and institutional policies. Conclusion. Although many faculty members in occupational therapy education programs value clinical practice as a part of their educator role, it is necessary to negotiate responsibilities and rewards to prevent role overload and comply with institutional policies.

AB - Objective. This study investigated whether and how faculty clinical practice (FCP) was being implemented in occupational therapy professional education programs. Method. Chairpersons and faculty members from all accredited entry-level occupational therapy curricula in the United States were asked to complete questionnaires about their involvement in FCP. The chairperson questionnaire consisted of primarily closed-ended questions that addressed the organization of faculty practice within their programs, whereas the faculty questionnaire was primarily open-ended and addressed faculty members' individual involvement in FCP as well as the perceived benefits and drawbacks. Responses were analyzed for 39 program chairpersons and 136 faculty members were analyzed. Results. Twenty-five chairperson respondents reported that their educational program had FCP, and 44 faculty respondents indicated involvement in FCP during the past year. FCP was more prevalent in public-funded institutions and academic health centers. Faculty members primarily engaged in FCP in order to stay current, enhance teaching, and develop networks. They reported increased credibility with students as an important benefit of clinical practice. The primary reasons faculty members did not engage in clinical practice were insufficient time and institutional policies. Conclusion. Although many faculty members in occupational therapy education programs value clinical practice as a part of their educator role, it is necessary to negotiate responsibilities and rewards to prevent role overload and comply with institutional policies.

KW - Education

KW - Professional practice

KW - Role

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034277047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034277047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5014/ajot.54.5.533

DO - 10.5014/ajot.54.5.533

M3 - Review article

C2 - 11006814

AN - SCOPUS:0034277047

VL - 54

SP - 533

EP - 540

JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0272-9490

IS - 5

ER -