Phosphate sources and their suitability for remediation of contaminated soils

A. S. Knox, D. I. Kaplan, Michael H Paller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Phosphate minerals and specifically apatite show promise for environmental cleanup because they can form stable compounds with a wide range of cationic contaminants. However, phosphate minerals naturally accumulate some heavy metals that may cause additional contamination of the environment if used improperly. Nine commercially available phosphate materials were evaluated for remediation of contaminated soil based on solubility, concentration of metal/metalloid impurities, and leachability of impurity metal/metalloids. The phosphate materials consisted of three groups: processed (i.e., fertilizers), mined (rock phosphates from different formations), and biogenic (ground fish bone). Processed and mined rock phosphates contained relatively high total concentrations of As, Co, Cr, and Cu but did not exceed the RCRA toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) limits. Biogenic apatite contained much lower metal concentrations than processed and mined rock phosphate and was appreciably more soluble. By combining biogenic and mined phosphate it is possible to obtain a wide range of phosphate release rates, permitting rapid immobilization of contaminants while providing a slow release of phosphate for continued long-term treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-279
Number of pages9
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume357
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2006

Fingerprint

Remediation
Phosphates
remediation
phosphate
Soils
phosphate rock
Phosphate minerals
Metalloids
Impurities
Apatites
Metals
Rocks
Apatite
apatite
metal
pollutant
mineral
cleanup
contaminated soil
Fertilizers

Keywords

  • Apatite
  • Biogenic apatite
  • Impurities
  • Mined phosphate
  • Phosphate sources
  • Remediation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

Phosphate sources and their suitability for remediation of contaminated soils. / Knox, A. S.; Kaplan, D. I.; Paller, Michael H.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 357, No. 1-3, 15.03.2006, p. 271-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Knox, A. S. ; Kaplan, D. I. ; Paller, Michael H. / Phosphate sources and their suitability for remediation of contaminated soils. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2006 ; Vol. 357, No. 1-3. pp. 271-279.
@article{04a4e76d7d7b41209ff5eb2c84338714,
title = "Phosphate sources and their suitability for remediation of contaminated soils",
abstract = "Phosphate minerals and specifically apatite show promise for environmental cleanup because they can form stable compounds with a wide range of cationic contaminants. However, phosphate minerals naturally accumulate some heavy metals that may cause additional contamination of the environment if used improperly. Nine commercially available phosphate materials were evaluated for remediation of contaminated soil based on solubility, concentration of metal/metalloid impurities, and leachability of impurity metal/metalloids. The phosphate materials consisted of three groups: processed (i.e., fertilizers), mined (rock phosphates from different formations), and biogenic (ground fish bone). Processed and mined rock phosphates contained relatively high total concentrations of As, Co, Cr, and Cu but did not exceed the RCRA toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) limits. Biogenic apatite contained much lower metal concentrations than processed and mined rock phosphate and was appreciably more soluble. By combining biogenic and mined phosphate it is possible to obtain a wide range of phosphate release rates, permitting rapid immobilization of contaminants while providing a slow release of phosphate for continued long-term treatment.",
keywords = "Apatite, Biogenic apatite, Impurities, Mined phosphate, Phosphate sources, Remediation",
author = "Knox, {A. S.} and Kaplan, {D. I.} and Paller, {Michael H}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.07.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "357",
pages = "271--279",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phosphate sources and their suitability for remediation of contaminated soils

AU - Knox, A. S.

AU - Kaplan, D. I.

AU - Paller, Michael H

PY - 2006/3/15

Y1 - 2006/3/15

N2 - Phosphate minerals and specifically apatite show promise for environmental cleanup because they can form stable compounds with a wide range of cationic contaminants. However, phosphate minerals naturally accumulate some heavy metals that may cause additional contamination of the environment if used improperly. Nine commercially available phosphate materials were evaluated for remediation of contaminated soil based on solubility, concentration of metal/metalloid impurities, and leachability of impurity metal/metalloids. The phosphate materials consisted of three groups: processed (i.e., fertilizers), mined (rock phosphates from different formations), and biogenic (ground fish bone). Processed and mined rock phosphates contained relatively high total concentrations of As, Co, Cr, and Cu but did not exceed the RCRA toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) limits. Biogenic apatite contained much lower metal concentrations than processed and mined rock phosphate and was appreciably more soluble. By combining biogenic and mined phosphate it is possible to obtain a wide range of phosphate release rates, permitting rapid immobilization of contaminants while providing a slow release of phosphate for continued long-term treatment.

AB - Phosphate minerals and specifically apatite show promise for environmental cleanup because they can form stable compounds with a wide range of cationic contaminants. However, phosphate minerals naturally accumulate some heavy metals that may cause additional contamination of the environment if used improperly. Nine commercially available phosphate materials were evaluated for remediation of contaminated soil based on solubility, concentration of metal/metalloid impurities, and leachability of impurity metal/metalloids. The phosphate materials consisted of three groups: processed (i.e., fertilizers), mined (rock phosphates from different formations), and biogenic (ground fish bone). Processed and mined rock phosphates contained relatively high total concentrations of As, Co, Cr, and Cu but did not exceed the RCRA toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) limits. Biogenic apatite contained much lower metal concentrations than processed and mined rock phosphate and was appreciably more soluble. By combining biogenic and mined phosphate it is possible to obtain a wide range of phosphate release rates, permitting rapid immobilization of contaminants while providing a slow release of phosphate for continued long-term treatment.

KW - Apatite

KW - Biogenic apatite

KW - Impurities

KW - Mined phosphate

KW - Phosphate sources

KW - Remediation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33244462611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33244462611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.07.014

M3 - Article

VL - 357

SP - 271

EP - 279

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

IS - 1-3

ER -