Physician and Coding Errors in Patient Records

Susan S. Lloyd, J. Peter Rissing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

203 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Veterans Administration's discharge abstract system was studied to identify error frequency, source, and effect in five Veterans Administration hospitals. We reviewed 1,829 medical records from 21 services for concordance with the abstract; sampling provided 95% confidence for each service. Of these records, 1,499 (82%) differed from the abstract in at least one item. Of 20,260 items, 4,360 (22%) were incorrect, with three error sources: physician (62%), coding (35%), and keypunch (3%). We projected 2.14 physician and 0.81 coding errors in the average abstract. Eighty-nine percent of projected physician errors were failures to report a procedure or diagnosis. Coding was subjective and errors were synergistic with physician errors. We projected that correction of errors would change 19% of the records for diagnosis-related group purposes and substantially increase future resource allocation. This effect varied considerably by service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1330-1336
Number of pages7
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume254
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 13 1985

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this