Physiologic measures of sexual function in women

a review

Terri L. Woodard, Michael Peter Diamond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To review and describe physiologic measures of assessing sexual function in women. Design: Literature review. Setting: Studies that use instruments designed to measure female sexual function. Patient(s): Women participating in studies of female sexual function. Intervention(s): Various instruments that measure physiologic features of female sexual function. Main Outcome Measure(s): Appraisal of the various instruments, including their advantages and disadvantages. Result(s): Many unique physiologic methods of evaluating female sexual function have been developed during the past four decades. Each method has its benefits and limitations. Conclusion(s): Many physiologic methods exist, but most are not well-validated. In addition there has been an inability to correlate most physiologic measures with subjective measures of sexual arousal. Furthermore, given the complex nature of the sexual response in women, physiologic measures should be considered in context of other data, including the history, physical examination, and validated questionnaires. Nonetheless, the existence of appropriate physiologic measures is vital to our understanding of female sexual function and dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-34
Number of pages16
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arousal
Physical Examination
History
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Psychophysiologic testing
  • female sexual dysfunction
  • female sexual function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Physiologic measures of sexual function in women : a review. / Woodard, Terri L.; Diamond, Michael Peter.

In: Fertility and sterility, Vol. 92, No. 1, 01.07.2009, p. 19-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1be0a16cf404d7682b82d5023797584,
title = "Physiologic measures of sexual function in women: a review",
abstract = "Objective: To review and describe physiologic measures of assessing sexual function in women. Design: Literature review. Setting: Studies that use instruments designed to measure female sexual function. Patient(s): Women participating in studies of female sexual function. Intervention(s): Various instruments that measure physiologic features of female sexual function. Main Outcome Measure(s): Appraisal of the various instruments, including their advantages and disadvantages. Result(s): Many unique physiologic methods of evaluating female sexual function have been developed during the past four decades. Each method has its benefits and limitations. Conclusion(s): Many physiologic methods exist, but most are not well-validated. In addition there has been an inability to correlate most physiologic measures with subjective measures of sexual arousal. Furthermore, given the complex nature of the sexual response in women, physiologic measures should be considered in context of other data, including the history, physical examination, and validated questionnaires. Nonetheless, the existence of appropriate physiologic measures is vital to our understanding of female sexual function and dysfunction.",
keywords = "Psychophysiologic testing, female sexual dysfunction, female sexual function",
author = "Woodard, {Terri L.} and Diamond, {Michael Peter}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "19--34",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiologic measures of sexual function in women

T2 - a review

AU - Woodard, Terri L.

AU - Diamond, Michael Peter

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Objective: To review and describe physiologic measures of assessing sexual function in women. Design: Literature review. Setting: Studies that use instruments designed to measure female sexual function. Patient(s): Women participating in studies of female sexual function. Intervention(s): Various instruments that measure physiologic features of female sexual function. Main Outcome Measure(s): Appraisal of the various instruments, including their advantages and disadvantages. Result(s): Many unique physiologic methods of evaluating female sexual function have been developed during the past four decades. Each method has its benefits and limitations. Conclusion(s): Many physiologic methods exist, but most are not well-validated. In addition there has been an inability to correlate most physiologic measures with subjective measures of sexual arousal. Furthermore, given the complex nature of the sexual response in women, physiologic measures should be considered in context of other data, including the history, physical examination, and validated questionnaires. Nonetheless, the existence of appropriate physiologic measures is vital to our understanding of female sexual function and dysfunction.

AB - Objective: To review and describe physiologic measures of assessing sexual function in women. Design: Literature review. Setting: Studies that use instruments designed to measure female sexual function. Patient(s): Women participating in studies of female sexual function. Intervention(s): Various instruments that measure physiologic features of female sexual function. Main Outcome Measure(s): Appraisal of the various instruments, including their advantages and disadvantages. Result(s): Many unique physiologic methods of evaluating female sexual function have been developed during the past four decades. Each method has its benefits and limitations. Conclusion(s): Many physiologic methods exist, but most are not well-validated. In addition there has been an inability to correlate most physiologic measures with subjective measures of sexual arousal. Furthermore, given the complex nature of the sexual response in women, physiologic measures should be considered in context of other data, including the history, physical examination, and validated questionnaires. Nonetheless, the existence of appropriate physiologic measures is vital to our understanding of female sexual function and dysfunction.

KW - Psychophysiologic testing

KW - female sexual dysfunction

KW - female sexual function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649126250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649126250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.041

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.041

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 19

EP - 34

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 1

ER -