Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center

Valerie I. Shavell, Mazen E. Abdallah, Michael Peter Diamond, Jay M. Berman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the Essure placement failure rate and analyze factors associated with failure in an urban, nonstudy population at a university medical center. STUDY DESIGN: A retro-spective study was conduct-ed of women who underwent attempted Essure hystero-scopic sterilization at the De-troit Medical Center (DMC) from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007. RESULTS: There were 316 Essure procedures attempted at the DMC from January 2003 through June 2007. Of the 316 attempted proce-dures, there were 22 device placement failures and 3 doc-umented post-Essure pregnancies. Of the 22 placement failures, 11 were attributed to difficulty visualizing the tubal ostia. Other causes of failure included device mal-function, uterine perforation, tubal perforation, expul-sion of the device, tubal spasm, tubal ostia too large for the device and unspecified. Difficulty visualizing the ostia (p < 0.001) and a longer procedure time (p=0.008) were significantly associated with failure. CONCLUSION: The rate of successful placement of the Essure permanent birth control device at the DMC is 92.1%, with a post-Essure pregnancy rate of 0.95%. The majority of placement failures may be attributed to diffi-culty visualizing the tubal ostia. (J Reprod Med 2009; 54:218-222).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-222
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist
Volume54
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jun 17 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contraception
Equipment Failure
Equipment and Supplies
Uterine Perforation
Urban Population
Spasm
Pregnancy Rate
Statistical Factor Analysis
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Essure
  • Hysteroscopic sterilization
  • Pregnancy
  • Tubal occlusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center. / Shavell, Valerie I.; Abdallah, Mazen E.; Diamond, Michael Peter; Berman, Jay M.

In: Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, Vol. 54, No. 4, 17.06.2009, p. 218-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e57ec2f23744a339dca8ea0174e8402,
title = "Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the Essure placement failure rate and analyze factors associated with failure in an urban, nonstudy population at a university medical center. STUDY DESIGN: A retro-spective study was conduct-ed of women who underwent attempted Essure hystero-scopic sterilization at the De-troit Medical Center (DMC) from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007. RESULTS: There were 316 Essure procedures attempted at the DMC from January 2003 through June 2007. Of the 316 attempted proce-dures, there were 22 device placement failures and 3 doc-umented post-Essure pregnancies. Of the 22 placement failures, 11 were attributed to difficulty visualizing the tubal ostia. Other causes of failure included device mal-function, uterine perforation, tubal perforation, expul-sion of the device, tubal spasm, tubal ostia too large for the device and unspecified. Difficulty visualizing the ostia (p < 0.001) and a longer procedure time (p=0.008) were significantly associated with failure. CONCLUSION: The rate of successful placement of the Essure permanent birth control device at the DMC is 92.1{\%}, with a post-Essure pregnancy rate of 0.95{\%}. The majority of placement failures may be attributed to diffi-culty visualizing the tubal ostia. (J Reprod Med 2009; 54:218-222).",
keywords = "Essure, Hysteroscopic sterilization, Pregnancy, Tubal occlusion",
author = "Shavell, {Valerie I.} and Abdallah, {Mazen E.} and Diamond, {Michael Peter} and Berman, {Jay M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "218--222",
journal = "Journal of Reproductive Medicine",
issn = "0024-7758",
publisher = "Donna Kessel",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Placement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical center

AU - Shavell, Valerie I.

AU - Abdallah, Mazen E.

AU - Diamond, Michael Peter

AU - Berman, Jay M.

PY - 2009/6/17

Y1 - 2009/6/17

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the Essure placement failure rate and analyze factors associated with failure in an urban, nonstudy population at a university medical center. STUDY DESIGN: A retro-spective study was conduct-ed of women who underwent attempted Essure hystero-scopic sterilization at the De-troit Medical Center (DMC) from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007. RESULTS: There were 316 Essure procedures attempted at the DMC from January 2003 through June 2007. Of the 316 attempted proce-dures, there were 22 device placement failures and 3 doc-umented post-Essure pregnancies. Of the 22 placement failures, 11 were attributed to difficulty visualizing the tubal ostia. Other causes of failure included device mal-function, uterine perforation, tubal perforation, expul-sion of the device, tubal spasm, tubal ostia too large for the device and unspecified. Difficulty visualizing the ostia (p < 0.001) and a longer procedure time (p=0.008) were significantly associated with failure. CONCLUSION: The rate of successful placement of the Essure permanent birth control device at the DMC is 92.1%, with a post-Essure pregnancy rate of 0.95%. The majority of placement failures may be attributed to diffi-culty visualizing the tubal ostia. (J Reprod Med 2009; 54:218-222).

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the Essure placement failure rate and analyze factors associated with failure in an urban, nonstudy population at a university medical center. STUDY DESIGN: A retro-spective study was conduct-ed of women who underwent attempted Essure hystero-scopic sterilization at the De-troit Medical Center (DMC) from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007. RESULTS: There were 316 Essure procedures attempted at the DMC from January 2003 through June 2007. Of the 316 attempted proce-dures, there were 22 device placement failures and 3 doc-umented post-Essure pregnancies. Of the 22 placement failures, 11 were attributed to difficulty visualizing the tubal ostia. Other causes of failure included device mal-function, uterine perforation, tubal perforation, expul-sion of the device, tubal spasm, tubal ostia too large for the device and unspecified. Difficulty visualizing the ostia (p < 0.001) and a longer procedure time (p=0.008) were significantly associated with failure. CONCLUSION: The rate of successful placement of the Essure permanent birth control device at the DMC is 92.1%, with a post-Essure pregnancy rate of 0.95%. The majority of placement failures may be attributed to diffi-culty visualizing the tubal ostia. (J Reprod Med 2009; 54:218-222).

KW - Essure

KW - Hysteroscopic sterilization

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Tubal occlusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66949179355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66949179355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 218

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Reproductive Medicine

JF - Journal of Reproductive Medicine

SN - 0024-7758

IS - 4

ER -