Position statement: Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An endocrine society position statement

William Rosner, Richard J. Auchus, Ricardo Azziz, Patrick M. Sluss, Hershel Raff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

770 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the current state of clinical assays for total and free testosterone. Participants: The five participants were appointed by the Council of The Endocrine Society and charged with attaining the objective using published data and expert opinion. Evidence: Data were gleaned from published sources via online databases (principally PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar), the College of American Pathologists, and the clinical and laboratory experiences of the participants. Consensus Process: The statement was an effort of the committee and was reviewed in detail by each member. The Council of The Endocrine Society reviewed a late draft and made specific recommendations. Conclusions: Laboratory proficiency testing should be based on the ability to measure accurately and precisely samples containing known concentrations of testosterone, not only on agreement with others using the same method. When such standardization is in place, normative values for total and free testosterone should be established for both genders and children, taking into account the many variables that influence serum testosterone concentration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-413
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Testosterone
Laboratory Proficiency Testing
Expert Testimony
PubMed
MEDLINE
Standardization
Assays
Databases
Testing
Serum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Biochemistry
  • Endocrinology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biochemistry, medical

Cite this

Position statement : Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An endocrine society position statement. / Rosner, William; Auchus, Richard J.; Azziz, Ricardo; Sluss, Patrick M.; Raff, Hershel.

In: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 92, No. 2, 01.01.2007, p. 405-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosner, William ; Auchus, Richard J. ; Azziz, Ricardo ; Sluss, Patrick M. ; Raff, Hershel. / Position statement : Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An endocrine society position statement. In: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007 ; Vol. 92, No. 2. pp. 405-413.
@article{256e99b808784846a59c9a41594dc948,
title = "Position statement: Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An endocrine society position statement",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the current state of clinical assays for total and free testosterone. Participants: The five participants were appointed by the Council of The Endocrine Society and charged with attaining the objective using published data and expert opinion. Evidence: Data were gleaned from published sources via online databases (principally PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar), the College of American Pathologists, and the clinical and laboratory experiences of the participants. Consensus Process: The statement was an effort of the committee and was reviewed in detail by each member. The Council of The Endocrine Society reviewed a late draft and made specific recommendations. Conclusions: Laboratory proficiency testing should be based on the ability to measure accurately and precisely samples containing known concentrations of testosterone, not only on agreement with others using the same method. When such standardization is in place, normative values for total and free testosterone should be established for both genders and children, taking into account the many variables that influence serum testosterone concentration.",
author = "William Rosner and Auchus, {Richard J.} and Ricardo Azziz and Sluss, {Patrick M.} and Hershel Raff",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1210/jc.2006-1864",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "405--413",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0021-972X",
publisher = "The Endocrine Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Position statement

T2 - Utility, limitations, and pitfalls in measuring testosterone: An endocrine society position statement

AU - Rosner, William

AU - Auchus, Richard J.

AU - Azziz, Ricardo

AU - Sluss, Patrick M.

AU - Raff, Hershel

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the current state of clinical assays for total and free testosterone. Participants: The five participants were appointed by the Council of The Endocrine Society and charged with attaining the objective using published data and expert opinion. Evidence: Data were gleaned from published sources via online databases (principally PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar), the College of American Pathologists, and the clinical and laboratory experiences of the participants. Consensus Process: The statement was an effort of the committee and was reviewed in detail by each member. The Council of The Endocrine Society reviewed a late draft and made specific recommendations. Conclusions: Laboratory proficiency testing should be based on the ability to measure accurately and precisely samples containing known concentrations of testosterone, not only on agreement with others using the same method. When such standardization is in place, normative values for total and free testosterone should be established for both genders and children, taking into account the many variables that influence serum testosterone concentration.

AB - Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the current state of clinical assays for total and free testosterone. Participants: The five participants were appointed by the Council of The Endocrine Society and charged with attaining the objective using published data and expert opinion. Evidence: Data were gleaned from published sources via online databases (principally PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Google Scholar), the College of American Pathologists, and the clinical and laboratory experiences of the participants. Consensus Process: The statement was an effort of the committee and was reviewed in detail by each member. The Council of The Endocrine Society reviewed a late draft and made specific recommendations. Conclusions: Laboratory proficiency testing should be based on the ability to measure accurately and precisely samples containing known concentrations of testosterone, not only on agreement with others using the same method. When such standardization is in place, normative values for total and free testosterone should be established for both genders and children, taking into account the many variables that influence serum testosterone concentration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846991956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846991956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1210/jc.2006-1864

DO - 10.1210/jc.2006-1864

M3 - Article

C2 - 17090633

AN - SCOPUS:33846991956

VL - 92

SP - 405

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0021-972X

IS - 2

ER -