Positional accuracy of four die tray systems

D. W. Richardson, R. A. Sanchez, Philip S Baker, S. P. Haug

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the positional accuracy of dies with four die tray systems. The die trays were: (1) Accu*trac Precision die system, (2) Model-Tray system, (3) Sterdo Split model tray, and (4) Tricodent One*Cast die tray system. Positional change of the dies was measured by using an Olympus binocular scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Positional change of the dies was the difference between preremoval and postremoval die position. Results show that all four die tray systems are not significantly different in most measurement categories, although the Model-Tray system was significantly different from the other die tray systems in one measurement category.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-45
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of prosthetic dentistry
Volume66
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Richardson, D. W., Sanchez, R. A., Baker, P. S., & Haug, S. P. (1991). Positional accuracy of four die tray systems. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 66(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90349-2

Positional accuracy of four die tray systems. / Richardson, D. W.; Sanchez, R. A.; Baker, Philip S; Haug, S. P.

In: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, Vol. 66, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 39-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richardson, DW, Sanchez, RA, Baker, PS & Haug, SP 1991, 'Positional accuracy of four die tray systems', The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90349-2
Richardson, D. W. ; Sanchez, R. A. ; Baker, Philip S ; Haug, S. P. / Positional accuracy of four die tray systems. In: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1991 ; Vol. 66, No. 1. pp. 39-45.
@article{f3784906f46441cabe88651bbcf6b78a,
title = "Positional accuracy of four die tray systems",
abstract = "This study evaluated the positional accuracy of dies with four die tray systems. The die trays were: (1) Accu*trac Precision die system, (2) Model-Tray system, (3) Sterdo Split model tray, and (4) Tricodent One*Cast die tray system. Positional change of the dies was measured by using an Olympus binocular scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Positional change of the dies was the difference between preremoval and postremoval die position. Results show that all four die tray systems are not significantly different in most measurement categories, although the Model-Tray system was significantly different from the other die tray systems in one measurement category.",
author = "Richardson, {D. W.} and Sanchez, {R. A.} and Baker, {Philip S} and Haug, {S. P.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0022-3913(91)90349-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "66",
pages = "39--45",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positional accuracy of four die tray systems

AU - Richardson, D. W.

AU - Sanchez, R. A.

AU - Baker, Philip S

AU - Haug, S. P.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - This study evaluated the positional accuracy of dies with four die tray systems. The die trays were: (1) Accu*trac Precision die system, (2) Model-Tray system, (3) Sterdo Split model tray, and (4) Tricodent One*Cast die tray system. Positional change of the dies was measured by using an Olympus binocular scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Positional change of the dies was the difference between preremoval and postremoval die position. Results show that all four die tray systems are not significantly different in most measurement categories, although the Model-Tray system was significantly different from the other die tray systems in one measurement category.

AB - This study evaluated the positional accuracy of dies with four die tray systems. The die trays were: (1) Accu*trac Precision die system, (2) Model-Tray system, (3) Sterdo Split model tray, and (4) Tricodent One*Cast die tray system. Positional change of the dies was measured by using an Olympus binocular scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Positional change of the dies was the difference between preremoval and postremoval die position. Results show that all four die tray systems are not significantly different in most measurement categories, although the Model-Tray system was significantly different from the other die tray systems in one measurement category.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026197907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026197907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90349-2

DO - 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90349-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 1941672

AN - SCOPUS:0026197907

VL - 66

SP - 39

EP - 45

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 1

ER -