Post-PEG feeding time: A web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists

Tauseef Ali, Vu Le, Tushar Sharma, Kenneth J Vega, Nandakumar Srinivasan, William M. Tierney, Syed Rizvi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Literature suggests early post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding is as safe as delayed feeding. No consensus exists regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement. We performed a national survey to assess current practice regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement as well as clinical and practitioner based factors associated with early or delayed feeding. Methods: A survey assessing feeding initiation in general ward and intensive care unit patients, current literature knowledge, motility agent use, number of PEG placed per year, along with physician demographics was emailed to 5256 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was done using SAS software (V.9). Results: 28% of gastroenterologists responded. Amongst respondents, 59% were private consultants, 25% academic physicians and 16% trainees. Private gastroenterologists initiated feeding earlier (≤12. h) compared to academic gastroenterologists in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p<. 0.0001). Amongst respondents, 41% of physicians were aware of current literature on post-PEG feeding times. Physicians aware of current literature started feeding earlier (<12. h) compared to those not aware in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p= 0.0002). Male physicians instituted feeding earlier than females (p<. 0.0001). Conclusions: Feeding initiation after PEG placement varies amongst gastroenterologists. Further studies are required to explore obstacles in standardizing post-PEG feeding practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)768-771
Number of pages4
JournalDigestive and Liver Disease
Volume43
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Patients' Rooms
Physicians
Intensive Care Units
Consultants
Gastroenterologists
Surveys and Questionnaires
Software
Demography

Keywords

  • Endoscopy
  • Feeding
  • PEG tube

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Post-PEG feeding time : A web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists. / Ali, Tauseef; Le, Vu; Sharma, Tushar; Vega, Kenneth J; Srinivasan, Nandakumar; Tierney, William M.; Rizvi, Syed.

In: Digestive and Liver Disease, Vol. 43, No. 10, 01.10.2011, p. 768-771.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ali, T, Le, V, Sharma, T, Vega, KJ, Srinivasan, N, Tierney, WM & Rizvi, S 2011, 'Post-PEG feeding time: A web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists', Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.003
Ali, Tauseef ; Le, Vu ; Sharma, Tushar ; Vega, Kenneth J ; Srinivasan, Nandakumar ; Tierney, William M. ; Rizvi, Syed. / Post-PEG feeding time : A web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists. In: Digestive and Liver Disease. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 10. pp. 768-771.
@article{d9489752d77044ebb32ed9893781b38f,
title = "Post-PEG feeding time: A web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists",
abstract = "Background: Literature suggests early post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding is as safe as delayed feeding. No consensus exists regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement. We performed a national survey to assess current practice regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement as well as clinical and practitioner based factors associated with early or delayed feeding. Methods: A survey assessing feeding initiation in general ward and intensive care unit patients, current literature knowledge, motility agent use, number of PEG placed per year, along with physician demographics was emailed to 5256 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was done using SAS software (V.9). Results: 28{\%} of gastroenterologists responded. Amongst respondents, 59{\%} were private consultants, 25{\%} academic physicians and 16{\%} trainees. Private gastroenterologists initiated feeding earlier (≤12. h) compared to academic gastroenterologists in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p<. 0.0001). Amongst respondents, 41{\%} of physicians were aware of current literature on post-PEG feeding times. Physicians aware of current literature started feeding earlier (<12. h) compared to those not aware in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p= 0.0002). Male physicians instituted feeding earlier than females (p<. 0.0001). Conclusions: Feeding initiation after PEG placement varies amongst gastroenterologists. Further studies are required to explore obstacles in standardizing post-PEG feeding practices.",
keywords = "Endoscopy, Feeding, PEG tube",
author = "Tauseef Ali and Vu Le and Tushar Sharma and Vega, {Kenneth J} and Nandakumar Srinivasan and Tierney, {William M.} and Syed Rizvi",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "768--771",
journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease",
issn = "1590-8658",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-PEG feeding time

T2 - A web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists

AU - Ali, Tauseef

AU - Le, Vu

AU - Sharma, Tushar

AU - Vega, Kenneth J

AU - Srinivasan, Nandakumar

AU - Tierney, William M.

AU - Rizvi, Syed

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Background: Literature suggests early post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding is as safe as delayed feeding. No consensus exists regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement. We performed a national survey to assess current practice regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement as well as clinical and practitioner based factors associated with early or delayed feeding. Methods: A survey assessing feeding initiation in general ward and intensive care unit patients, current literature knowledge, motility agent use, number of PEG placed per year, along with physician demographics was emailed to 5256 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was done using SAS software (V.9). Results: 28% of gastroenterologists responded. Amongst respondents, 59% were private consultants, 25% academic physicians and 16% trainees. Private gastroenterologists initiated feeding earlier (≤12. h) compared to academic gastroenterologists in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p<. 0.0001). Amongst respondents, 41% of physicians were aware of current literature on post-PEG feeding times. Physicians aware of current literature started feeding earlier (<12. h) compared to those not aware in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p= 0.0002). Male physicians instituted feeding earlier than females (p<. 0.0001). Conclusions: Feeding initiation after PEG placement varies amongst gastroenterologists. Further studies are required to explore obstacles in standardizing post-PEG feeding practices.

AB - Background: Literature suggests early post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding is as safe as delayed feeding. No consensus exists regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement. We performed a national survey to assess current practice regarding feeding initiation after PEG placement as well as clinical and practitioner based factors associated with early or delayed feeding. Methods: A survey assessing feeding initiation in general ward and intensive care unit patients, current literature knowledge, motility agent use, number of PEG placed per year, along with physician demographics was emailed to 5256 gastroenterologists. Statistical analysis was done using SAS software (V.9). Results: 28% of gastroenterologists responded. Amongst respondents, 59% were private consultants, 25% academic physicians and 16% trainees. Private gastroenterologists initiated feeding earlier (≤12. h) compared to academic gastroenterologists in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p<. 0.0001). Amongst respondents, 41% of physicians were aware of current literature on post-PEG feeding times. Physicians aware of current literature started feeding earlier (<12. h) compared to those not aware in general ward and intensive care unit patients (p= 0.0002). Male physicians instituted feeding earlier than females (p<. 0.0001). Conclusions: Feeding initiation after PEG placement varies amongst gastroenterologists. Further studies are required to explore obstacles in standardizing post-PEG feeding practices.

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Feeding

KW - PEG tube

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052468965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052468965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 21622036

AN - SCOPUS:80052468965

VL - 43

SP - 768

EP - 771

JO - Digestive and Liver Disease

JF - Digestive and Liver Disease

SN - 1590-8658

IS - 10

ER -